AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion
Rejection of orders against government agencies or related applications must be justified, specific, and compliant with due process. Courts tend to scrutinize the legality and fairness of such rejection orders, often setting them aside if procedural lapses or arbitrariness are found (Rajdeep Das VS Union Of India - Gauhati, ANITH KUMAR CHATHOTH vs COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT - Kerala, ST.ANTONYS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, Vs STATE OF KERALA, - Kerala). Agencies are required to provide clear reasons, adhere to statutory requirements, and ensure transparency in their rejection decisions. Overall, arbitrary or vague rejection orders are vulnerable to legal challenge and reversal.

Search Results for "Rejection of t i Order against Government Agencies"

Rajdeep Das VS Union Of India

2020 0 Supreme(Gau) 652 India - Gauhati

SOUMITRA SAIKIA

The petitioner challenged the rejection, arguing that the Act did not apply to him as his qualifications were not recognized under ... Final Decision: The rejection orders of the NORI certificate applications were set aside, and the matter was remanded back ... Recognition of foreign medical qualifications under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, and the National Medical Commission Act, 2019; Rejection ... However, on 25-12-2019 his second application was again rejected on the same ground which was reflected in the earlier r....

Suresh Prasad Jaiswal VS State of Jharkhand

2009 0 Supreme(Jhk) 962 India - Jharkhand

SUSHIL HARKAULI

exactly were short-coming, how they could be removed and should be given time to rectify the defects—Board’s attitude not helpful—Rejection ... of NOC application should be last resort when petitioner is not interested in setting up industry—Impugned order quashed. ... The Board required the petitioner to submit its project through a government agency or “approved” agency. Despite request of the petitioner, the Board refused to specify which agencies were “approved” for the purpose. ... In the counter affidavit the Board....

Producin Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (T And D) Cooperative Federation Limited

2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 347 India - Chhattisgarh

GOUTAM BHADURI, RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL

mixing of inferior quality Sal seeds from neighboring states with the seeds procured from Udanti Forest, and concluded that the rejection ... filed a suit for refund of security deposit after the contract for collection of Sal seed from Udanti Forest was terminated due to rejection ... that the Sal seeds procured from Udanti Forest were mixed with inferior quality seeds from neighboring states, and therefore, the rejection ... He would submit that in order to ascertain whether any import of the Sal seed was done from the....

MANOJ VARGHESE vs STATE OF KERALA

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 43874 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

P.M. MANOJ, J

order. ... non-payment for overlapping periods, the petitioner should be recognized for service length in determining full-time benefits under the government ... Initially, the approval of appointments in both the leave and regular vacancies were rejected by all the departmental agencies under the Government. However, by Ext.P2 judgment, those rejection orders were set aside, and the benefit was directed to be granted to the petitioner. ... The words deployed in the Government #HL_STAR....

ANITH KUMAR CHATHOTH vs COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28103 India - High Court of Kerala

P.V.ASHA, J

Final Decision: The court set aside the order rejecting regularisation and directed the government to consider the petitioner's ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner challenged the rejection of his request for regularisation after serving as a Computer ... compared to similarly situated employees and that the rejection of his request for regularisation was in violation of a prior judgement ... The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P2 order. It is pointed out that reject....

ST.ANTONYS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, Vs STATE OF KERALA,

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43689 India - High Court of Kerala

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J

Various court orders and subsequent government regulations impacted the petitioner's claims, culminating in a rejection of their ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner, an aided school, sought assignment of land based on a government order aimed at facilitating ... Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to land assignment under existing government orders and the interpretation of ... The dispute in this case is related to rejection of the petitioner's application for assignment o....

Mani C. Kappan VS K. M. Mani

2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 774 India - Kerala

K.RAMAKRISHNAN

Payment of Salaries and Allowances Act 1951 (T.C.), Sections 5, 2(a) and 2(b) – Representation of the People Act 1951, S. 36 – The government ... agencies providing electricity, water, telephone with also rent in case he had been in occupation of any Government accommodation during the last 10 years. ... As per the order issued by the Election Commission, certificate must show that there is no demand issued from the above agencies and no amount is due for the last 10 years from that person for occupyin....

Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs NBCC (India) Limited

2025 0 Supreme(Del) 333 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The defendant sought to dismiss the suits claiming immunity based on a Supreme Court order. ... (A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order VII Rule 11 - Jurisdiction and legal actions concerning the Amrapali Group - Supreme Court ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court’s order does not grant blanket immunity to the defendant against new contracts it enters ... The intent of proposing these four (4) conditions was to protect the defendant against any responsibility from the past and existing disputes between the promoters of ex-man....

East West Construction, Represented by Shri.  Khekiye Yepthomi VS State of Nagaland, represented by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Nagaland, Kohima

2017 0 Supreme(Gau) 301 India - Gauhati

SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO

for construction - Office of Commissioner, Government issued notice bearing No. dated inviting tender in two standard bidding system ... Constitution of India - Article 226 – Tender - Technical bid and financial bid - Praying for Work Order ... contractor i.e. petitioner within one month from today so that execution of the work may start at earliest, in public interest - Order ... Besides, government machineries or agencies cannot be allowed to breach or violate the terms and conditions framed and notif....

Sumangala Steels Ltd. , PIPDIC Industrial Estate, Mettupalayam, Pondicherry VS Government of the Union Territory of Pondicherry by its Chief Secretary

2001 0 Supreme(Mad) 22 India - Madras

K.SAMPATH

... (b) The Unit also did not obtain any of the requisite statutory clearances from various Government and other Agencies, like Directorate of Industries, Inspectorate of Factories, Commune Panchayat, etc. as required for starting a new unit. ... The respondents had stated that the revised Government Order dated 11.2.1991 was not applicable to expansion. There was no such provision in the said Government order. ... The Pondicherry Government conveyed approval for the ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top