AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Remand is typically refused when parties do not contest the matter or fail to produce evidence, as courts prioritize active participation and substantive contestation. Instances such as arbitrator refusals, lack of service proof, or unchallenged contractual disputes often lead to dismissal or refusal to remand, underscoring the principle that procedural fairness and contestation are essential for judicial proceedings to proceed effectively.

Search Results for "Remand Refused because Parties did Not Contest Matter"

Vurimi Veerabhadraiah VS Vurimi Seshamma alias Seshamamba

1996 0 Supreme(AP) 99 India - Andhra Pradesh

C.V.N.SASTRY, S.PARVATHA RAO

an arbitrator or arbitrators, and that the implication is that in the arbitration agreement the arbitrator or arbitrators must not ... The Court found that that sole arbitrator refused to act. ... ... ( 12 ) IN Kanhyalal s case (supra) it was contended that where the parties have agreed to settle the matters by arbitrators in the trial Court and one of the arbitrators refused to act as an arbitrator, the trial Court should not have superseded ... In that case also the disputes that ar....

Sheela Barse VS Union of India

India - Crimes

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, RANGANATH MISRA

There are in numerable jails, sub-jails, remand-homes, custodial-institutions etc. ... The opposite parties would not have had the benefit of the information contained in the communication. ... Applicant, however, has, and is entitled to, her own view sin the matter. We regret our inability to accept them. ... This wide range of the responsibilities necessarily implies correspondingly higher measure of control over the parties, the subject-matter and the procedure. ... It is the practi....

Inderjeet Kaur VS Nirpal Singh

2000 8 Supreme 350 India - Supreme Court

D.P.MOHAPATRA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL

At the stage of granting leave to defend parties rely on affidavits in support of the rival contentions. ... of the premises from a tenant under clause (e) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14, when as a matter of fact the requirement ... Section 25B(6) states that where leave is granted to a tenant to contest the eviction application, the Controller shall commence ... Rent Controller as well as of the High Court and grant leave to defend to the appellant-tenant and remand the matter to the ....

Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation (India) Ltd.  VS Employees State Insurance

1986 0 Supreme(Cal) 460 India - Calcutta

Umesh C.Banerjee

The contractors challenged the demand, arguing that their employees did not come within the ambit of the Act. ... The Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation also filed a writ petition challenging the Authority's power to raise any demand for its ... In the view I have taken, the writ petition filed by the Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation being Matter No. 1650 of 1985 also falls and is dismissed There shall, however, be no order as to costs. ... Prayer for stay by Mr. Deb is refused. ... Dutt and submi....

Rohit Kumar Ekka VS Ambika Kishan

2021 0 Supreme(Ori) 277 India - Orissa

D.DASH

considered as a valid reason to give her an opportunity to contest the case. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the lower appellate court's decision to remand the matter was justified, ... Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the lower appellate court's decision to remand the matter to the trial court ... to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law by further providing the parties to lea evidence and argue their case. ... He further subm....

PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS LTD VS OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL

2001 0 Supreme(Cal) 357 India - Calcutta

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY

The arrest of a ship is for the purpose of detaining it unless the matter is finally settled by a competent Court. ... The arrest of a ship is for the purpose of detaining it unless the matter is finally settled by a competent Court. ... Lima-I suffered excessive moisture content during the shipment, rendering it useless. ... Before me that point has not been urged by the learned Counsel for the defendant. So I need not consider that aspect of the matter. ... Sd/- Subhro Kamal Mukherje....

Pritam Singh VS Raj Kumar

2013 0 Supreme(P&H) 720 India - Punjab and Haryana

K.KANNAN

served at all and that he never refused, if both the parties did not give any evidence, it would have only resulted in a finding ... there was no service--Burden, in this case, must therefore be on the person, who affirmed that there was a valid service which was refused ... serve summons and that defendant did not refuse to receive the same--Evidence Act, 1872, S.102. ... A person, who was relying therefore that there was a valid service of notice, and yet another person contending th....

BHAVANI CHEMICALS THRO PARTNERRAJESH KANUBHAI DESAI vs UNION OF INDIA THRO SECRETARY & 1

India - Gujarat High Court

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, CJ, J.B. PARDIWALA, J

(A) Article 14, Constitution of India - Disputes arising out of contractual obligations between parties, Maintainability of writ ... (Paras 3.1, 8, 15) ... ... Findings of Court: ... The Court found that the matter fell within the realm of contractual ... law element - The Court emphasized that the Government must act fairly even in contractual relationships, and any retrospective demand ... dispute between the parties arose out of a private contract between the parties. ... In the case before us, t....

Sree Sankarachari Swamiar VS Varada Pillai

1903 0 Supreme(Mad) 78 India - Madras

SUBRAHMANIA AYYAR, BODDAM

Recovery Act - Landlord-Tenant Dispute - Section 4, Section 9, Section 82 - The court discussed the application of estoppel in the context ... The judgment emphasized the enforceability of these clauses in the context of a valid contract between the landlord and tenant. ... It also analyzed specific clauses in the patta and emphasized the enforceability of these clauses in the context of a valid contract ... In such a case is not the representation in respect of what by itself is no other than a fact, viz., the propriety....

SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ETC.  ETC.  VS STATE OF HARYANA

2017 2 Supreme 516 India - Supreme Court

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT

provide any locus to an allottee to contest claim for enhancement of compensation – Impugned judgment set aside and matter remitted ... nbsp;(B) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 41 Rule 27 – Production of additional evidence – Parameters – Trial Court has refused ... judgment – Additional evidence cannot be permitted to fill-in lacunae or to patch-up weak points in case – There was no ground for remand ... For the above reasons, we allow these appeals and set aside the impugned order and remand the #H....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top