AI Overview

AI Overview...

Right to Sell a Property by a Trade Union

Analysis and Conclusion:
Trade unions possess the legal capacity to own, buy, and sell property, including land, under statutory frameworks and their internal rules. However, such transactions must follow proper procedures, including member approval and compliance with relevant laws. Courts generally support union rights to dispose of property but emphasize transparency and adherence to rules to prevent arbitrary actions. The union’s authority to sell property is thus contingent upon legal compliance, proper authorization, and safeguarding members' interests.

References:
- GANGA SAHAI VS BHARAT BHAN - Allahabad, Manoj Kumar VS State of Bihar - Patna, T. B. Manoharan VS Government of India, Represented By Ministry of Oil & Natural Gas - Kerala, MANOHARAN.T.B. vs GOVT.OF INDIA - Kerala, Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation VS State Of Bihar - Patna, P. S. MURALEEDHARAN VS REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS - Kerala, K K LALU vs THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - Kerala, KHADI BOARD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION(CITU vs KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD    Advocate -SRI TOM K THOMAS, SC KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES B - Kerala, SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB vs BHANWAR LAL DHABHAI AND ORS. - Delhi

Search Results for "Right to Sell a Property by a Trade Union"

GANGA SAHAI VS BHARAT BHAN

1950 0 Supreme(All) 47 India - Allahabad

MOOTHAM, SAPRU

through trustees, can sue and be sued, and any person having a claim against it must look to its property and not that of its members ... Decidendi: The court reasoned that a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, has a separate name, can hold property ... Such union can buy and sell land not exceeding one acre, and personal estate without limit of amount, for the use and benefit of such trade union and the members thereof. ... the rules of the union#H....

Manoj Kumar VS State of Bihar

1995 0 Supreme(Pat) 344 India - Patna

S.N.JHA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

The State has the inherent or paramount right to carry on trade in minerals, including the right to win minerals itself and deal ... Whether the State has the inherent or paramount right to carry on trade in minerals, including the right to win minerals itself and ... Rule 4 of the Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972, does not abrogate the State's right to carry on trade in minerals. ... In terms of Article 299 of the Constitution of India the....

T. B.  Manoharan VS Government of India, Represented By Ministry of Oil & Natural Gas

2013 0 Supreme(Ker) 163 India - Kerala

MANJULA CHELLUR, K.VINOD CHANDRAN

trust to mine and collect sea shell do not give exclusive rights and thus termination of such rights' don't amounts to violation of right ... Union of India (AIR 1959 Punjab 510), it was a licence to work in mines of Government property. ... The right to work in a mine upon another's land does not exist before the licence or lease is granted to him and cannot be treated as a right analogous to the fundamental right of a citizen to trade and buy and sell#HL_E....

MANOHARAN.T.B. vs GOVT.OF INDIA

2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29314 India - High Court of Kerala

MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ, K VINOD CHANDRAN, J

Finding of the Court: The court found that the petitioners did not possess a legal right to unconditionally mine seashells ... Union of India WA.2865/07 & 238/08 21 (AIR 1959 Punjab 510), it was a licence to work in mines of Government property. ... The right to work in a mine upon another's land does not exist before the licence or lease is granted to him and cannot be treated as a right analogous to the fundamental right of a citizen to trade and buy and #HL_START....

Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation VS State Of Bihar

1995 0 Supreme(Pat) 343 India - Patna

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, SACHCHIDANAND JHA

TO MINING LEASE - EXECUTIVE POWER OF THE STATE - ENTITLEMENT TO CARRY ON TRADE IN MINERALS - ENTITLEMENT TO WIN MINERALS AND SELL ... Whether the State has the right to carry on trade in minerals, that is to say, the right to do mining operation and deal in minerals ... for lease and in that case it would be entitled to preference under Rule 12 but if the Government decides to win the minerals and sell ... In terms of Article 298 of the constitution of India the executive power of the ....

P. S.  MURALEEDHARAN VS REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS

India - Kerala

V.G.ARUN

Trade Union - Property Disposal - Trade Unions Act, 1926 - [Trade Union, Property Disposal, Trade Unions Act, 1926] - The court ... to the sale of the Union's property, claiming it was purchased using their contributions. ... to sell its properties. ... encumbering the plaint schedule property, or taking any decision affecting the right of the members of the plaintiff Association....

K K LALU vs THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 885 India - High Court of Kerala

V. G. Arun, J

Issues: Whether the trade union had the authority to sell its property without consulting former employees who claim continued ... Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the amended bye-laws of the trade union permitted property sales and established ... union regarding the sale of property and upheld the amended bye-laws allowing such action, emphasizing members' consent is necessary ... respondent union fro....

KHADI BOARD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION(CITU vs KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD    Advocate -SRI TOM K THOMAS, SC KERALA KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES B

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25904 India - High Court of Kerala

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J

Property - Employees Union Rights - Kerala Khadi and Village Industries Board Act - Section 9(1) - The Court upheld the Board's ... right to dispose of property under specific provisions, emphasizing the necessity of government approval to prevent arbitrary actions ... Issues: Whether the Employees Union has the right to question the Khadi Board's decision to release land for public interest ... Rule 9(1) of the Rules stipulates that the Board may, if it is satisfied that any immovabl....

Srinagar Stamp Vendors Association VS State of J&K

2020 0 Supreme(J&K) 500 India - Jammu and Kashmir

TASHI RABSTAN

Whether the restriction imposed on the petitioners' right to carry on their trade was reasonable and in the public interest? (a) the supply, sale and use of stamps and stamped papers; (b) the persons by whom alone such sale is to be conducted, (c) the duties and remuneration of such persons, (d) the manner of ascertaining the market value of immovable property ... Sub-section (2) of Section 74, as excerpted supra, envisages that rules may, inter alia, regulate: supply, sale and use of stamps and stamped papers; persons by whom alone s....

SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB vs BHANWAR LAL DHABHAI AND ORS.

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7083 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

TEJAS KARIA, J

(A) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 29 and 30 - Infringement and passing off - Plaintiff sought permanent injunction against Defendants ... (Paras 2, 27, 29) ... ... (B) Trade Marks - Well-Known Marks - The issue of ... Urfee Roomi, the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that the Plaintiff, Sandvik Intellectual Property AB, is an intellectual property holding Company that is organised and existing under the laws of Sweden. ... The Plaintiff apprehended that Defendant No. 1 was attempting to determine the comp....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top