AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion: The sources collectively underscore the legal importance of registration under the Registration Act, 1908, especially for documents that are statutorily required to be registered, as unregistered documents are generally inadmissible as evidence. Additionally, the cases involving property disputes and criminal recoveries in Kalbadevi demonstrate the significance of procedural adherence and proper documentation for establishing legal rights and accountability. These references reinforce the principle that legal validity and enforceability often hinge on compliance with registration and procedural norms, particularly in property and criminal law contexts.

Search Results for "S Kaladevi Versis Vr s Kaladevi Versis Vr Shyamsundar"

Kshetriya Sri Gandhi Ashram VS Ajay Kumar

2019 0 Supreme(All) 2594 India - Allahabad

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI

(supra) and para nos. 12 to 15 of the judgment in S.Kaladevi (supra). IV. ... (supra) and S.Kaladevi (supra) it can be safely concluded that if a document compulsorily required to be registered under Section 17 of the Act, 1908, is not registered, then it is not admissible into evidence under Section 49 of the Act, 1908. ... (supra) as reproduced above, have been reiterated by Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.Kaladevi vs V.R.Somasundaram & Ors. (2010) 5 SCC 401 (para 13). 19. ... Kaladev vs. U.R. Somasundaram and others, (2010....

USHABEN VS GENERAL MANAGER, ONGC-DELETED

2005 0 Supreme(Guj) 830 India - Gujarat

K.M.MEHTA, R.S.GARG

State of Bihar, 2001 (8) SCC 197 [Para 2.17H];; Kaladevi vs. ... In support of the said contention, the learned counsel has relied upon para 6 of the plaint which we have quoted in para 2. 4, and, the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Kaladevi v. Ramchandra, reported in 1986 ACJ 818, particularly paragraphs 2, 3 and 5.

Surendra Mohan Mathur VS Pyarelal Mathur

1979 0 Supreme(Raj) 159 India - Rajasthan

N.M.KASLIWAL, DWARKA PRASAD

Pannibai deceased, namely Smt Kamladevi, Smt. Sushiladevi and Smt. Pushpalata Devi be brought on record and the delay in filing the application for substitution be condoned. It was also submitted that the plaintiff, who is the son of Smt. ... In Daya Rams case (2), the appellant had impleaded some of the heirs of the deceased respondent within the time allowed by law, but had omitted to bring two of the heirs of the deceased respondent Shyamsundari on record.

Sahebro Kaluram Bhintade VS State of Maharashtra (At the instance of DCB, CID, UNIT (III)

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1711 India - Bombay

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, SWAPNA JOSHI

The said gun was recovered from Accused Nos.2 to 5 from Kalbadevi area while attempting to commit dacoity on 26.4.2008 in the jurisdiction of LT Marg Police Station. ... (g) On 26th April, 2008 the secret information was received by Police Inspector Sandbhor to the effect that some persons were likely to commit dacoity in a jewelry shop at Kalbadevi. ... He is the witness/pancha on recoveries from these accused 2 to 5 at the place opposite Vitthalwadi Mandir in at Kalbadevi Road where they were apprehended. He has pointed out that the pe....

BHUDHRANI HOUSING DEVELOPER (P) LTD. & 2 ORS. vs MRS. VEENA S. MAKHIJA & ANR.

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

6/8, DWARKA ASHISH BUILDING, JAMBUL WADI, KALBADEVI ROAD,MUMBAI-400002MAHARAHSTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus 1. KIRAN A. ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus

BHUDHRANI HOUSING DEVELOPER (P) LTD. & 2 ORS. vs M/S. J.S. SOBHASINGH AND SONS & ANR.

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

6/8, DWARKA ASHISH BUILDING, JAMBUL WADI, KALBADEVI ROAD,MUMBAI-400002MAHARAHSTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus 1. KIRAN A. ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus

BHUDHRANI HOUSING DEVELOPER (P) LTD. & 2 ORS. vs S.P. JAGTIANI & 2 ORS.

India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

6/8, DWARKA ASHISH BUILDING, JAMBUL WADI, KALBADEVI ROAD,MUMBAI-400002MAHARAHSTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus 1. KIRAN A. ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus ... MUMBAI-400005MAHARASHTRA...........Petitioner(s)Versus

BHUDHRANI HOUSING DEVELOPER (P) LTD. & 2 ORS. vs M/S. J.S. SOBHASINGH AND SONS & ANR.

2017 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1155 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

BHUDHRANI HOUSING DEVELOPER (P) LTD. & 2 ORS. vs S.P. JAGTIANI & 2 ORS.

2017 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1144 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

BHUDHRANI HOUSING DEVELOPER (P) LTD. & 2 ORS. vs MRS. VEENA S. MAKHIJA & ANR.

2017 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1152 India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top