AI Overview

AI Overview...

Schedule H Drugs - Summary

Analysis and Conclusion

Schedule H drugs are strictly regulated under Indian drug laws to ensure safe and authorized medical use. Compliance involves obtaining proper licenses, maintaining accurate records, and selling only on valid prescriptions. Enforcement agencies actively investigate violations, and courts uphold these regulations to prevent misuse and illegal sales. Violations can lead to severe penalties, including license cancellation and legal penalties. Proper understanding and adherence to these provisions are crucial for pharmaceutical stakeholders to operate legally and ethically.

References:
- M/S.MEDYBIZ PHARMA PVT. LTD., vs THE DRUGS INSPECTOR - Madras
- Santosh Kumar Mishra VS Union of India - Calcutta
- G. D. SEARLE & CO. VS MEDIGRAPHS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. - Bombay
- Kasim Bhai VS State - Allahabad
- CADILA LABORATORIES LIMITED VS DABUR INDIA LIMITED - Delhi
- Garg Medical Hall VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana
- Amit Kumar Son of Late Ram Babu Chaudhary VS State of Bihar - Patna

Search Results for "Schedule H Drugs"

M/S.MEDYBIZ PHARMA PVT. LTD., vs THE DRUGS INSPECTOR

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33426 India - High Court of Madras

Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

obtaining signed orders for the sale of H-schedule drugs and the legal consequences of violating these provisions, ultimately ruling ... Fact of the Case: The Drug Inspector filed a complaint against a pharmaceutical company for selling H-schedule drugs ... Drugs - Prohibition of Sale - Drugs and Cosmetic Act - [18(c), 27(d), Rule 65(9)(b)] - This case highlights the importance of ... The supply of Drugs specific under Schedule H and Sche....

Santosh Kumar Mishra VS Union of India

2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 935 India - Calcutta

JOYMALYA BAGCHI

The NCB has the jurisdiction to conduct an enquiry into the possession, transshipment, or dealing in Schedule “H” drugs, even if ... NOTICE Fact of the Case: Employees of a clearing and forwarding agent of a company licensed to manufacture and deal in Schedule ... the Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB) had the jurisdiction to conduct an enquiry into the possession, transshipment, or dealing in Schedule ... He further submitted that although a licensee under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act is entitled to deal in....

G. D.  SEARLE & CO.  VS MEDIGRAPHS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.  LTD.

1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 122 India - Bombay

Y.S.JAHAGIRDAR

TRADEMARK - INFRINGEMENT - DECEPTIVE SIMILARITY - INTENTION OF ADOPTION - MEDICAL DRUGS - SCHEDULE DRUGS - COMMON WORDS - SUFFIX ... In the case of medical drugs, which are schedule drugs available only on prescription, the similarity of the last words in the marks ... The learned counsel further submits that both the drugs are schedule drugs and are available only on the prescription of the medical practitioner. ... The trade mark ....

Kasim Bhai VS State

1956 0 Supreme(All) 17 India - Allahabad

ASTHANA

DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT, 1940 - SECTION 27, RULE 65(2), RULE 65(9), RULE 110 - STOCKING OF SCHEDULE H DRUGS WITHOUT QUALIFIED ... Whether sub-rules (2) and (9) of Rule 65 prohibit the stocking of Schedule H drugs without a qualified person? 2. ... He was found in possession of Schedule H drugs without a qualified person and in possession of date-expired penicillin ointment for ... The accused admitted that he had a licence to deal in non-biological medicines only and ....

CADILA LABORATORIES LIMITED VS DABUR INDIA LIMITED

1997 0 Supreme(Del) 314 India - Delhi

M.K.SHARMA

The court also noted that the two drugs were Schedule H drugs, which are required to be purchased on the basis of a doctor's prescription ... were Schedule H drugs, which are required to be purchased on the basis of a doctor's prescription. * The class of purchasers who ... were likely to buy the drugs was therefore likely to be knowledgeable and careful. ... Therefore, both the drugs are Schedule h drugs and since they are requir....

Garg Medical Hall VS State of Punjab

2011 0 Supreme(P&H) 1532 India - Punjab and Haryana

K.KANNAN

mentioned in Schedule-H, and the petitioner was required to give an undertaking to not keep Schedule-H drugs. ... The court modified the cancellation to apply only to Schedule-H drugs and allowed the petitioner to give an undertaking to not store ... such drugs. ... The petitioner is prepared to give an undertaking that he shall not keep any medicines/drugs that are set out in Schedule-H. ... The order of cancellation of licence is modified to provid....

Amit Kumar Son of Late Ram Babu Chaudhary VS State of Bihar

2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 598 India - Patna

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH

Finding of the Court: The court found that the drugs recovered from the petitioner's shop were Schedule H and H1 drugs ... NDPS Act - Drug Possession - Interpretation of Schedule H and H1 drugs Fact of the Case: The petitioner was found ... in possession of Corex Cough Syrup, Fortwin Injection, and Ativan tablets without a valid license for Schedule H and H1 drugs. ... The petitioner has licence to sell, stock or exhibit for sale or distribute by retail d....

Union Public Service Commission VS Shristi Singh

2019 0 Supreme(SC) 920 India - Supreme Court

L. NAGESWARA RAO, HEMANT GUPTA

by M/s Alpa Laboratories is dated 17.03.2015 – Certificate which showed experience of first Respondent for 18 months in testing Schedule ... Findings of Court: Certificate which showed the experience of first Respondent for 18 months in testing Schedule ... ‘C’ drugs on a non-remunerative job is doubtful. ... The first one was issued on 05.03.2014 in which there was no mention of her experience in testing Schedule ‘C’ drugs. The second certificate is dated 17.03.2015 which refers to her experience in te....

Narcotics Control Bureau VS Nafe Singh

2010 0 Supreme(Del) 631 India - Delhi

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 23, 24, 29---Possession of Schedule H drugs ---Bail application ... The learned Special Judge observed that remaining four tablets came under category of Schedule ‘H’ Drugs under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and the list appended to NDPS Act but were not included in Schedule I of NDPS Rules. ... He submitted that drugs recovered from the respondents were covered under the NDPS Act and since recovery wa....

LUPIN LABORATORIES LTD.  VS JAIN PRODUCTS

1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 120 India - Bombay

Y.S.JAHAGIRDAR

AND MERCHANDISE MARKS ACT, 1958 - SECTIONS 12(3), 30 - SIMILARITY OF MARKS - HONEST CONCURRENT USE - ACQUIESCENCE - INJUNCTION - SCHEDULE ... DRUGS - CONFUSION AMONG CUSTOMERS - REPUTATION OF THE PRODUCT. ... Pharma Limited (supra), that even the schedule drugs are available across the counter, then the Customer is entitled to ascertain whether the medicine demanded to him and handed over to him by the salesman is one of the same. ... Pharma Limited (AIR 1992 Bom. 35.), to emphasize the submission that the test to decide....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top