AI Overview...
-
Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - It prescribes the limitation period for filing contempt proceedings, generally one year from the date of the alleged contempt. The section emphasizes that timely initiation is a condition precedent for the court's jurisdiction to entertain contempt cases DINESHBHAI A. PAARIKH VS KRIPALU CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,ahmedabad - Gujarat, State Of Bihar VS Ambika Roy - Patna, Banki Muhan Ramachandi Thakurani VS Hajuri Prafulla Chandra Khuntia - Orissa, Devi Kishan VS Madan Lal Verma - Rajasthan.
-
Limitation and Jurisdiction - If proceedings are initiated after the expiry of the limitation period, they are barred and the court cannot entertain them. Several cases highlight that delays beyond one year render contempt petitions time-barred, leading to dismissal Jayadev Swain VS Vatsala Raghu - Orissa, H. Md. Sultan and another VS Tamil Nadu Wakf Board through its Secretary, Chennai and others - Madras.
-
Application of Limitation Act - Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which allows condonation of delay, does not generally apply to contempt proceedings under Section 20, emphasizing strict adherence to the limitation period Jayadev Swain VS Vatsala Raghu - Orissa.
-
Exceptions and Judicial Interpretations - Courts have sometimes questioned the applicability of Section 20, especially regarding doubts about the provision's scope, but the majority view affirms that Section 20 is a mandatory limitation that limits the court's jurisdiction if not complied with DINESHBHAI A. PAARIKH VS KRIPALU CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,ahmedabad - Gujarat, Devi Kishan VS Madan Lal Verma - Rajasthan.
-
Case Law Examples - Notable judgments include the Supreme Court's decision in Jagjit Singh v. Union of India (2017), reaffirming the strict interpretation of Section 20, and other cases where proceedings filed beyond the limitation period were dismissed AMIT SINGH VS BHUPENDRA KAUR ALULAK - Uttarakhand.
Analysis and Conclusion
Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, sets a strict one-year limitation for filing contempt petitions, and non-compliance results in the barred jurisdiction of courts to entertain such cases. The provision cannot be circumvented by applying the Limitation Act's Section 5, emphasizing the importance of timely initiation of contempt proceedings. Judicial decisions consistently uphold the mandatory nature of this limitation period to ensure efficiency and finality in contempt cases.
References: - DINESHBHAI A. PAARIKH VS KRIPALU CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,ahmedabad - Gujarat - N. VENKATARAMANAPPA VS D. K. NAIKAR - Karnataka - State Of Bihar VS Ambika Roy - Patna - Jayadev Swain VS Vatsala Raghu - Orissa - AMIT SINGH VS BHUPENDRA KAUR ALULAK - Uttarakhand - Banki Muhan Ramachandi Thakurani VS Hajuri Prafulla Chandra Khuntia - Orissa - Devi Kishan VS Madan Lal Verma - Rajasthan
Search Results for "Sec 20 of Contempt of Courts Act"
1980 0 Supreme(Guj) 125 • India - Gujarat
S.H.SHETH, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926-Sec. 20-Contempt-Limitation. ... ... What sec. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act provides is not the period ... But it is a condition perecedent to the exercise of court s power under that Act. ... If it was so then sec. 20 would bar our jurisdiction to take action against the respondents under th....
1977 0 Supreme(Kar) 215 • India - Karnataka
LAL, V.S.MALIMATH
. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act. ... Contempt of Courts - Criminal Contempt - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sec. 12, Art. 215 - Sec. 200 Crlpc, Sec. 202 Crpc - Sec ... due to the statutory bar of limitation under Sec. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act. ....
1989 0 Supreme(Pat) 206 • India - Patna
B.N.AGRAWAL, BINODANAND SINGH
. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. ... contempt committed on 8-4-1983 - Proceeding barred by limitation under Sec. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. ... Therefore, the proceeding was barred by limitation under Sec. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Issues: 1. ... Court cannot amount to init....
2005 0 Supreme(Ori) 192 • India - Orissa
P.K.MOHANTY, J.P.MISHRA
LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - Sec. 5 - Contempt of Courts Act, 1951 - Sec. 20 - Applicability of Limitation Act to contempt proceed¬ings ... appeals and it does not apply to contempt proceedings - Proceedings to be filed within one year from the date of alleged violation ... - Proceedings filed after one year and eleven months - Cause of illness - Held, Sec. 5 of Limitation Act is only ....
2020 0 Supreme(UK) 567 • India - Uttarakhand
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Sec. 20 – Contempt petition filed by petitioner – Non-compliance writ Court ... (Paras 2 and 13) U;k;ky; voekuuk vf/kfu;e] 1971] /kkjk 20 & ;kfpdkdÙkkZ }kjk voekuuk ... Jagjit Singh and others, (2017) 1 SCC 148 – Legality of – High Court hold that order passed by this Court ... 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act. .....
2008 0 Supreme(Ori) 467 • India - Orissa
L.MOHAPATRA, I.MAHANTY
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 - Sec. 20 - Limitation Act - Sec. 5 - High Court passed order on 27.6.2000 - Contempt petition filed ... OLR 151, Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is to be construed strictly - Section 5 of the Limitation Act regarding condonation ... of delay is not applicable to a proceeding under the Conte....
1999 0 Supreme(Guj) 257 • India - Gujarat
J.R.VORA, SHARAD D.DAVE
within the meaning of Sec. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. ... . 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. ... This decision takes in to consideration, the provisions contained under Sec. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Sec. 24-A ... ... ( 1 ) THIS is a Motion of Contempt under the #HL_START....
1999 0 Supreme(Mad) 2796 • India - Madras
V.KANAGARAJ
of Courts Act (LXI of 1971), Sec. 20 - Long delay in filing of contempt application - Contempt application time-barred. ... Board through its Secretary, Chennai and others .....Respondent(s) ... Contempt ... But, both the alleged appointment and the approval had been done in the year 1997 and this Contempt Application has been taken on file on 20.7.1999 and thus the same is hopelessly time barred within the meaning of Sec#....
1999 0 Supreme(Guj) 302 • India - Gujarat
ANIL R.DAVE, R.BALIA
. 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in respect of disobedience of which proceedings could not be initiated. ... . 20 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 but Court rejected the same holding that said provisions of limitation is doubtful to have any ... of Courts Act. ... This is apart from the fact that it is highly doubtful whether the provision of Sec. 20 appli....
2000 0 Supreme(Raj) 394 • India - Rajasthan
B.S.CHAUHAN
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Sec. 20 and Limitation Act, Sec. 5 – Contempt petition – Non-compliance of the order dated 5.7.93 of ... the Court – Filed contempt petition on 30.7.99 after delay of about six years – Held – Provisions of Sec. 20 provides for initiation ... – The jurisdiction of the court evaporates automatically after expiry of period provided u/#....
Filter by Legal Phrase
