AI Overview...
Section 256 CrPC Order: Revisable or Appealable?
In criminal proceedings, particularly in complaint cases like those under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, courts often dismiss complaints due to the complainant's non-appearance. Section 256 CrPC empowers magistrates to acquit the accused in such scenarios. But a critical question arises: Is an order passed under Section 256 CrPC not revisable? This post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from judicial precedents, to clarify whether revision petitions are maintainable or if appeals are the exclusive remedy.
Understanding Section 256 CrPC
Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, addresses non-appearance or non-prosecution by the complainant. It states that if the summons has been issued and the complainant neither appears nor is represented, the magistrate may acquit the accused or discharge them unless the complaintant's absence is due to a reasonable cause.
Key provisions:
- Applies after issuance of process/summons.
- Leads to acquittal if evidence stage is reached without complainant presence.
- Magistrate must exercise discretion judiciously, considering the complainant's conduct. Vinod Manaklalji Saboo VS Kishor Gopichandji Uke - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 31
For instance, in cases where the complainant fails to lead evidence, courts have held that mechanical dismissal without assessing conduct is improper. Dinesh Govindrao Mahalle VS State of Maharashtra - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 193
Does Section 256 Order Amount to Acquittal?
Typically, yes. An order under Section 256 CrPC operates as an acquittal, especially post-summons. This distinction is vital:
Pre-Process vs. Post-Process Dismissal
- Dismissal before issuing process (under Sections 203/204(4) CrPC, e.g., non-payment of process fees): Not acquittal; revisable under Section 397 CrPC. Bhola Shankar Patel S/o Late Balsingh Patel VS Vijay Kumar Nishad (Vegetable Commission Agent) Dhiman Engineering Works, Durg, Chhattisgarh - 2024 Supreme(Chh) 302 BHOLA SHANKAR PATEL Vs VIJAY KUMAR NISHAD - 2024 Supreme(Online)(CG) 5542
- Dismissal after process issuance (under Section 256): Amounts to acquittal; appealable, not revisable. Krishnankutty S/o. Madhavan VS Ramani W/o. Damu - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 574
Courts emphasize: If a complaint is dismissed for non-appearance... the Magistrate would get statutory sanction... only under Section 256 CrPC. This provision mandates acquittal. Krishnankutty S/o. Madhavan VS Ramani W/o. Damu - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 574
Is the Order Revisable? Judicial Stand
Generally, no. Revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC is barred against acquittal orders. The proper remedy is an appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC, requiring High Court leave.
Key Precedents
- Revision barred post-acquittal: The remedy for the complainant against an order of acquittal is by way of appeal, and filing a revision petition against such order is barred. Him Advances And Savings Pvt. Ltd. VS Ravinder Kumar Gupta
- In NI Act cases, where complainant absents during evidence: Acquittal recorded u/s. 256 CrPC... Proper remedy is an appeal u/ss. 378(4) and 410(1). Him Advances and Savings Pvt. Ltd. VS Ravinder Kumar Gupta
- High Court view: If objections... were upheld... entire prosecution... terminated. Hence... order was revisable – but only if not interlocutory; here, acquittal context limits revision. K. K. Patel VS State Of Gujarat - 2000 4 Supreme 160
Further, Article 227 Constitution (supervisory jurisdiction) doesn't convert to appealable original jurisdiction under Article 226. Letters Patent Appeals may not lie if under supervisory powers. GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS FIROZE M. MOGAL - 2013 Supreme(Guj) 529
Exceptions and Discretion
- Magistrate can't dismiss solely on absence; must consider conduct. Regular attendance shown via roznama warrants restoration. Dinesh Govindrao Mahalle VS State of Maharashtra - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 193
- For elderly complainants (e.g., 91 years), mechanical axing improper; remand possible. Daulatrao Yashwantrao Patil VS Subhash Babarao Mankar - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 69
- No restoration power post-dismissal: Once acquitted under 256, no inherent recall; appeal only. Fatehlal VS Shyam Sunder - 1991 Supreme(Raj) 868
In Section 138 NI Act complaints, repeated absences without justification uphold dismissal. N.SELVARAJ vs M.VISHNUVARDAN - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 18141
Appeal vs. Revision: Clear Distinction
| Aspect | Appeal (Section 378(4) CrPC) | Revision (Sections 397/401 CrPC) |
|--------|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| When Applicable | Post-acquittal in complaint cases | Non-acquittal orders; jurisdictional errors |
| Who Files | Complainant (with HC leave) | Any party; limited interference |
| Scope | Re-appreciate evidence | Correct patent errors; no merits re-exam |
| Bar | None specific | Barred against acquittal Him Advances and Savings Pvt. Ltd. VS Ravinder Kumar Gupta |
Sub-section (4) of Section 378... provides that against an Order of acquittal passed in any case instituted upon complaint... complainant may present such an appeal. Him Advances and Savings Pvt. Ltd. VS Ravinder Kumar Gupta
Revisional courts err entertaining revisions against 256 acquittals; quash on jurisdictional grounds. Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. VS State - 2013 Supreme(Del) 2374
Practical Implications for Complainants
- File appeal promptly with special leave; don't opt for revision.
- Maintain roznama records showing diligence to argue against dismissal.
- Seek adjournment with affidavit/medical proof to avoid 256 invocation. Satya Narayan Mohapatra VS Prafulla Kumar Patnaik
- In NI Act/cheque bounce: Persistent prosecution key; absence fatal. K. K. Subramaniam VS P. S. Suresh Babu - 2005 Supreme(Mad) 1412
Courts remand if miscarriage of justice, e.g., non-compliance with procedure. SHRAWAN MAHAR VS RAJESHWAR KHANDOPANT PAGE - 1928 Supreme(Nagpur) 4
Related Contexts from Case Law
- Police Act interplay: Time-bars under Section 161 don't alter 256 revisability. K. K. Patel VS State Of Gujarat - 2000 4 Supreme 160
- Small Causes Act: Mandatory deposits for setting aside ex-parte; analogous discretion. Kedarnath VS Mohan Lal Kesarwari - 2002 1 Supreme 72
- Broader CrPC revisions (e.g., Section 115 CPC analogs) stress no appealability where challenge possible in final appeal. Purohit Swaroopnarain VS Gopinath - 1953 Supreme(Raj) 80
Key Takeaways
- Section 256 CrPC orders post-summons = acquittal: Not revisable; appeal under 378(4).
- Pre-process dismissals: Revisable.
- Judicial discretion mandatory: Assess conduct, not mechanical dismissal.
- No restoration/recall: Appeal your remedy.
- NI Act specificity: High stakes; diligence crucial.
In most cases, attempting revision against a Section 256 CrPC order fails, as courts direct appeals. Legal outcomes vary by facts, stage, and jurisdiction.
Disclaimer: This post provides general information based on judicial trends and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance, as laws evolve and facts differ.
References integrated from case summaries; full judgments via IDs.
Search Results for "Section 256 CrPC Order: Revisable or Appealable?"
1994 0 Supreme(SC) 1 • India - Supreme Court
S.C.AGRAWAL, R.M.SAHAI, M.M.PUNCHHI, K.RAMASWAMY, S.R.PANDIAN
Section 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1976 by which Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh has deleted Section 438 of ... to Section 19 convictions are for offences other Sections 3 and 4 of Act 28 of 1987 the accused may be entitled to file an appeal ... to entertain petition to determine if proceedings were not an ....
1968 0 Supreme(SC) 44 • India - Supreme Court
to controvert the new plea but he will not be allowed to raise new pleas of his own having no relation to the grant of the second ... after the amendment. – It is also not necessary to go into the question of improvements now because in answer to the pleas to be ... the grant of the first Kuthakapattom – Court wish to add that the document Ex. 1 does n....
2000 4 Supreme 160 • India - Supreme Court
K.T.THOMAS, D.P.MOHAPATRA
is interlocutory or not as for Section 397(2) of the Code, the sole test is not whether such order was passed during the interim ... Hence, as per the said standard, the order was revisable. ... -Section 397(2) r/w Section 197-Revision-Maintainability of-Petition to discharge accused on ground sanction ... In view of the provisions contained in....
2002 1 Supreme 72 • India - Supreme Court
R.C.LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR
1908-Order 9 Rule 13-Application to set aside ex-parte decree-Proviso to Section 17 of a href=act: ... entertain and hear an application to set aside a decree passed ex-parte by Court of Small Causes-Proviso imposing condition as to ... An application seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed by a Court of Small Causes or for a review of its judgment must ....
1977 0 Supreme(P&H) 162 • India - Punjab and Haryana
S.C.MITAL, RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Final Decision: 1. ... Section 41(1) of the Punjab Courts Act is not affected by the amended Section 100 of the CPC due to the saving clause in Section ... The phrase "substantial question of law" in the amended Section 109 of the CPC is not interpreted as it is not relevant to the jurisdiction ... , not be ....
2016 0 Supreme(Del) 3803 • India - Delhi
VIPIN SANGHI
186/353/332/509/34 IPC - Section 256 Cr PC - Section 2(d) Fact of the Case: The petitioner sought to set aside orders ... dismissing their application under Section 256 Cr PC. ... Section 256 Cr PC - Setting aside of orders dated 09.01.2013 and 10.05.2016 - Article 227 of the Constitution o....
• India - Crimes
B.K.BEHERA
certificate was filed hence it was not taken care of by S.D.M. acquittal order passed by S.D.M. exercising powers under Section ... 256(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 -Whether the acquittal order is justified? ... Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 323, 34-Voluntarily causing hurt Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Section 256 (1) Acquittal for ... exercise ....
2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 31 • India - Bombay
A.P.BHANGALE
- Considering 2009 (2) Bom CR (Cri) 563 order set aside. - Power under Section 256, Cr PC cannot be exercised only on account of ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 256 - Restoration of complaint - Can restoration be allowed? ... In the interest of justice, therefore, impugned order will have to be set aside. ... complaint was dismisse....
2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 193 • India - Bombay
A.P.BHANGALE
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 256 - Dismissal of complaint under - Non appearance of complainant - Appeal against - Copy ... dismiss the complaint under Section 256, Cr PC cannot be exercised only on account of absence of complainant, but the Magistrate ... ... Impugned order dated 16th June, 2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate ......
2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 69 • India - Bombay
A.P.BHANGALE
of appellant would not be a proper exercise of the power envisaged in Section 256, Cr PC in view of the age of complainant (which ... Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Hand loan for huge amount - Appellant advanced huge loan - Additionally now to regularly ... I am, therefore, inclined to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back #HL_....
2013 0 Supreme(Del) 2374 • India - Delhi
SUNIL GAUR
. - Quashing of Impugned Order - Sections 385/469/471/500/509/511/120-B and 34 of IPC - [Section 256 of Cr.P.C., Section 378 (4) ... of Cr.P.C., Section 482 of Cr.P.C.] - The court discussed the application of Section 256 of Cr.P.C. and the difference between appellate ... Order passed by the learned Magistrate requires to be recalled as it was not proper. The revision petition is allowed. Order dismissing the complaint by the learned MM is recalled ....
1999 0 Supreme(All) 1815 • India - Allahabad
J.C.MISHRA
Fact of the Case: The complaint was dismissed under Section 256, Cr. P. ... The learned Counsel for the revisionist contended that since the order dismissing the complaint amounted to ac quittal the order was not revisable. ... ... This revision is directed against the order dated 16-7-1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Mirzapur allowing the revision setting aside the order dated 12-1-99 by which the com plaint was dismissed unde....
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
M.R.VERMA
The complainant failed to appear for evidence, and the court acquitted the respondent under Section 256 of the Code. ... , who was to lead evidence on the date fixed for hearing, in accordance with Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ... Section 256 - Acquittal on non-appearance of complainant - The court acquitted the respondent due to the absence of the complainant ... of the complainant under Section 256 of the Code. ... It was contende....
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
M.R.VERMA
of the complainant under Section 256 of the Code. ... It was contended that since the complainant had not led any evidence, therefore, the Order of acquittal is bad in law and is revisable or in any case, this Court can interfere with this Order under its inherent powers. ... 4. ... Sub-section (4) of Section 378 of the Code provides that against an Order of acquittal passed in any case instituted upon complaint, ....
2002 0 Supreme(HP) 82 • India - Himachal Pradesh
M.R.VERMA
Criminal Procedure - Acquittal - The court held that the order of acquittal under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ... The complainant failed to appear and lead evidence, resulting in the respondent's acquittal under Section 256 of the Code. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the order of acquittal was valid as per Section 256 of the Code, and the ... It was contended that since the complainant had not led any evidence, therefore, the #HL_ST....
Filter by Legal Phrase
