AI Overview...
Summary of State Bank of Travancore Kingston Sources
- Legal Cases and Judgments Involving State Bank of Travancore and Kingston Computers
- Multiple Supreme Court and High Court decisions (e.g., SCC 2011, SCC 524; SCC 2005, SCC 122; SCC 2002, SCC 426; SCC 2019, SCCOnline 897) address disputes involving State Bank of Travancore and Kingston Computers India Private Limited.
-
Key issues include the validity of suits against the bank, proper authorization, and the reliability of evidence, especially in cases of money recovery and criminal law State VS Chandrakant @ Chandru Jaiswar - Bombay, Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Ltd. VS M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Ltd. - Rajasthan, Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs Poddar Rubber Industries - Gauhati, Kapoor Imaging Private Limited VS Kodak (India) Private Limited - Madras.
-
Liability and Evidence in Financial Disputes
- The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of proper authorization and the reliability of evidence, noting that lack of proper authorization can render evidence unreliable (e.g., SCC 2011, SCC 524).
-
In cases involving cheques and financial liabilities, the courts scrutinized whether the bank or the company was legally authorized to initiate suits or take actions Charanjit Pal Jindal VS L. N. Metalics - Dishonour Of Cheque, Charanjit Pal Jindal VS L. N. Metalics - Crimes.
-
Procedural Aspects and Suit Maintainability
- Several judgments highlight procedural requirements under the Civil Procedure Code, such as proper impleading of the State as a defendant and authority to file suits Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Ltd. VS M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Ltd. - Rajasthan, State Bank of Travancore VS Kingston Computers (I) P. Ltd. - Supreme Court.
-
The courts have dismissed suits where procedural lapses or lack of proper authorization were evident.
-
Banking Operations and Disputes
- Issues such as dishonored cheques due to stop payment instructions and the legal implications thereof are discussed, with courts ruling on the sufficiency of proof regarding legal liabilities Charanjit Pal Jindal VS L. N. Metalics - Dishonour Of Cheque, Charanjit Pal Jindal VS L. N. Metalics - Crimes.
-
The judgments also touch upon the importance of proper documentation and authorization in banking transactions.
-
Insights and Main Points
- The Supreme Court's decision in State Bank of Travancore v. Kingston Computers (2011) is pivotal, emphasizing that evidence must be properly authorized to be reliable.
- Cases show a consistent judicial approach requiring strict adherence to procedural and evidentiary standards in disputes involving banks and corporate entities.
- The bank's role as a creature of the Banking Companies Act underscores the statutory framework governing its operations and liabilities.
Analysis and Conclusion
The collected judgments and references demonstrate that disputes involving the State Bank of Travancore and Kingston Computers often hinge on procedural correctness, proper authorization, and the reliability of evidence. The Supreme Court's rulings underscore the necessity for banks and claimants to adhere strictly to legal standards, especially concerning authorization to file suits and substantiate claims with proper documentation. These decisions reinforce the importance of procedural diligence in banking and corporate litigation, ensuring that claims are legally sound and properly supported.
Search Results for "State Bank of Travancore Kingston"
2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 766 • India - Bombay
M.S.SONAK, M.S.JAWALKAR
Acquittal - Criminal Law - State of M.P. Vs. Dayal Sahu (2005) 8 SCC 122, State Bank of Travancore Vs. ... Kingston Computers India Private Limited (2011) 11 SCC 524, State of Haryana Vs. Ram Singh (2002) 2 SCC 426, Girish Singh Vs. ... State of Uttarakhand,2019 SCCOnlineSC 897 - The judgment discusses the importance of the testimony of the victim and other prosecution ... He further relied on State Bank of Travancore#HL_E....
2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 1856 • India - Rajasthan
VINEET KOTHARI
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank of Travancore v. ... Kingston Computers India Pvt. ... CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE - ORDER 7 RULE 11 - SUIT MAINTAINABILITY - SUIT FILED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORITY - STATE NOT IMPLEADED AS DEFENDANT ... During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.N.R.Choudhary relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank of #H....
2011 0 Supreme(SC) 211 • India - Supreme Court
G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order 18 Rule 1-Money suit filed against Bank ... Bank of Travancore which are not specifically mentioned. ... Shukla, the Chief Executive Officer vide authority letter dated 2.1.2003 to do the following things: ... (i) to sign, verify and file a suit for recovery on behalf of the company against the State Bank of Travancore, R.K. ... Kingston Computers (I) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the company") was allowed and the suit fil....
2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 1683 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KARDAK ETE
Roy has placed reliance on the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers (I) P. Ltd., The case of Kingston Computers (I) Pvt. Ltd. (supra) relied on by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, pertains to Money Suit filed against the Bank by the respondent Kingston Computers (I) Pvt. ... Ltd. wherein it was not proved that the plaintiff was appointed as director of company and a resolution was passed by th....
2019 0 Supreme(Gau) 30 • India - Gauhati
KALYAN RAI SURANA
Taking up the preliminary issue No. first, it is seen that in this connection, the learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the case of State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers India Pvt. ... In this connection the learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the case of State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers India Private Limited, (2011) 11 SCC 524. ... the Hon'ble Apex Court when the subsequent case of #HL_START....
• India - Madras
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Bank of Travancore Vs. Kingston Computers (I) Pvt. Ltd. [(2011) 11 SCC 524] has made it clear that the evidence is unreliable for lack of proper authorization. Copy of the bank
• India - Dishonour Of Cheque
Kumari Sanju Panda
Agarwalla and others.1 and State Bank of Travancore v. Kingston Computers India Private Limited.2 ... 6. ... State of Gujarat and another.4 ... 7. ... The bank informed that the cheques could not be honoured due to stop payment on the account as per the instruction of the drawer. ... Regarding maintainability, complainant discharged initial burden of proving that the cheques were issued for discharge of legal liability and proved its case beyond all reasonable doubt by presenting the....
• India - Crimes
Kumari Sanju Panda
Agarwalla and others.1 and State Bank of Travancore v. Kingston Computers India Private Limited.2 6. ... State of Gujarat and another.4 7. ... The bank informed that the cheques could not be honoured due to stop payment on the account as per the instruction of the drawer. ... Regarding maintainability, complainant discharged initial burden of proving that the cheques were issued for discharge of legal liability and proved its case beyond all reasonable doubt by presenting the cheques....
2019 0 Supreme(AP) 195 • India - Andhra Pradesh
AKULA VENKATA SESHA SAI, CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
It is also significant to note in this context that the Honble Apex Court in the above referred judgment in United Bank of India ... In the case of State Bank of Travancore v. Kingston Computers (I) (P) Ltd. (supra), at Paras 12 to 14 the Hon'ble Apex Court held as under: "12. The Trial Court then referred to the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Nibro Limited v. ... Cas.. 388 (Del); (2) State Bank of Travancore v. Kingston Comput....
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1402 • India - Madras
M.SUNDAR
respectively - He further submitted that a careful perusal and comparison of same reveals that column is State when and under what ... Policy - Claim of Insurance Policy - negligence and not dishonesty on part of Banks employees - Banking Companies Act - plaintiff bank ... claiming loss of little over Crores - Plaintiff is a nationalised bank which is a creature of Banking Companies Act - Plaintiff ... Before I proceed to the next point, for the purpose of completion of facts and for the purpose of comprehensively capturing the trajectory....
Filter by Legal Phrase
