Sulochana Gupta in Legal Cases - The name Sulochana Gupta appears in various legal contexts, including civil, matrimonial, and property disputes. Notably, in a divorce case, the court emphasized that without proof of cruelty, a decree of divorce may be erroneous, referencing legal principles and precedents Sulochana VS M. Ramachari - Andhra Pradesh, Sulochana VS M. Ramachari - Current Civil Cases.
Matrimonial Disputes - In cases involving marriage and divorce, courts have highlighted that precedent is less significant than the facts and statutory provisions. For example, in a case under the Hindu Marriage Act, the court underscored the importance of applying legal principles based on statutes rather than precedents V. Sulochana VS K. Rajagopal - Madras.
Property and Title Cases - Sulochana is involved in property disputes, where courts have held that an agreement to sell does not transfer ownership until formal transfer, and findings in earlier suits can have res judicata effects on subsequent cases Manjul Rai VS Sulochana - Madhya Pradesh, Saroj Sheel VS Amarjit Kaur - Punjab and Haryana.
Criminal Cases - Evidence consistency and witness testimonies involving Sulochana have been scrutinized, with courts asserting that evidence from eye-witnesses like P.W. 2 Sulochana can be crucial in establishing offences such as murder, and appellate courts should not interfere with acquittals based on perverse findings State of Maharashtra, through Police Station House Officer VS Chandrabhan Mahagu Bawankule - Bombay.
Personal and Family Cases - Sulochana’s personal details, including her marriage to Dinanath and her role as a nominee for property, have been documented in judgments, reflecting her involvement in family law and property matters SULOCHANA DINANATH TARKAR VS ANIL DINANATH TARKAR - Bombay.
Analysis and Conclusion
The references indicate that Sulochana Gupta has been involved in various legal proceedings spanning matrimonial, property, and criminal law. Courts have emphasized the importance of factual proof over precedents in matrimonial cases, upheld the significance of proper legal procedures in property disputes, and relied on witness testimony in criminal cases. Her involvement underscores the multifaceted nature of legal issues she has been part of, with decisions consistently grounded in statutory law and evidence Kanteshwari Tiwari (Dead) Through L. Rs. VS Badri Prasad and Others - Allahabad, Sulochana VS M. Ramachari - Andhra Pradesh, Sulochana VS M. Ramachari - Current Civil Cases, Manjul Rai VS Sulochana - Madhya Pradesh, State of Maharashtra, through Police Station House Officer VS Chandrabhan Mahagu Bawankule - Bombay, Saroj Sheel VS Amarjit Kaur - Punjab and Haryana, SULOCHANA DINANATH TARKAR VS ANIL DINANATH TARKAR - Bombay.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others, 2011 (5) ADJ 800 - Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. ... Sulochhana Devi, AIR 1970 All 382 - Marudachala Nadar Vs. Chinna Muthu Nadar, AIR 1932 Mad 155; Veeraswami Vs. ... The court also cited various legal precedents to support its decision. ... The affidavit filed in substitution application was sworn by Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tewari alleging that he was authorised by all the legal heirs. ... The Hon'ble Single Judge has found that recently even the Apex Court has taken a similar view in Raj....
It was submitted, that Darshan Gupta desires to encash on his own fault, by seeking dissolution of marriage for a consequence of which he himself was blameworthy. The instant submission, though not canvassed in that manner, can be based on a legal premise. ... If we apply the aforementioned legal principles to the facts of the present case, we have no hesitation to hold that in the absence of the respondent proving cruelty against the appellant, the Court below has committed a serious error in granting decree of divorce ....
It was submitted, that Darshan Gupta desires to encash on his own fault, by seeking dissolution of marriage for a consequence of which he himself was blameworthy. The instant submission, though not canvassed in that manner, can be based on a legal premise. ... If we apply the aforementioned legal principles to the facts of the present case, we have no hesitation to hold that in the absence of the respondent proving cruelty against the appellant, the Court below has committed a serious error in granting decree of divorce ....
Kallyani Sulochana, (1993) 1 SCC 499(1993) 1 SCC 499(1993) 1 SCC 499(1999) 6 SCC 222] must also be understood in the context we have explained Ram Dass v.
The key legal provisions discussed were Sec. 31, 32, 33 of the Partnership Act, which govern the rights of assignees of a partner's ... Fact of the Case: The partnership firm incurred heavy losses, leading some partners to sell their shares to the petitioners ... Haridwarilal Gupta 2 Sri Lakshmichand Gupta (Respondent No.2) 3 Sri Brijmohan Gupta (the other complainant) 4 Sri Ramnivas Gupta 5 Mrs.Sulochana Agarwal (also known as Sulochana Gupra; ....
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Precedents will not be of importance in cases concerning marital relationship - Held, Court has to apply legal ... Puram Chand, A.I.R 1967 M.P. 209; Smt.Indu Gupta v. Rajeswar Prasad, A.I.R. 1982 Delhi 344 and Krishnan v. Smt.Nitu, A.I.R. 1986 Delhi 460. In case concerning marital relationship, precedent will be of little importance. For, that depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. ... We can only apply the legal principles on the basis of Statute. ... 25. .......
It affirmed the established legal principle that an intending purchaser does not become the owner of the land in dispute by virtue ... Prima Facie Case - Agreement to Sell - The court affirmed that an intending purchaser does not become the owner of the land in ... Fact of the Case: The appellants filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction based on an agreement ... Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Counsel for the respondents No. 3 and 4. 2. ... Challenging the order passed by the Court below, it is submitte....
. - Interference in order of acquittal under perverse finding not legal. ... Shri Gupta, learned Counsel for the respondent states that as far as evidence of P.W. 6 Bhadu is concerned, same is also not consistent with the evidence of P.W. 2 Sulochana. ... However, it is vehemently argued that the evidence of eye-witnesses, namely, P.W. 2 Sulochana, P.W. 4 Domu and P.W. 6 Bhadu is consistent with the material particulars of the prosecution case and proves the offence of murder against the respondent. .....
Musa Dadabhai Ummer, 2000(1) Civil Court Cases 712 - Sulochana Amma Vs. ... Ujagar Singh and others case 2001 (1) CCC 1 - Rukmani Vs. ... Narender, AIR 1984 SC 1866 Fact of the Case: The plaintiff, Saroj Sheel, filed a suit for declaration and permanent ... In Sulochana Amma Vs. Narayanan Nair, 1994(1) Civil Court Cases 383(SC), it has been held that a finding as to title given in an earlier injunction suit can operate as res-judicata in a subsequent suit for declaration of title. ... DEEPAK GUPTA, J. ....
Dinanath then married the original Plaintiff, his second wife, also named Sulochana, in May 1955. (References in this judgment to 'Sulochana' are, therefore, to Dinanath's second wife.) The original Plaintiff's maiden name was Godavari Ganpath Birje. She was given the name Sulochana on marriage. ... (Compiled record, paragraph 15, p. 145) Sulochana also produced a nomination form for the Parle Kalpataru Cooperative Housing Society by which Dinanath made Sulochana his sole nominee for the flat. ... Shoul....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.