AI Overview...
-
UAE Decree Enforcement in India - Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia explicitly permitted the simultaneous execution of a UAE decree in India, aligning with decisions by the Allahabad High Court in Om Parkash v. Tahera Begam and the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Karnail Singh Sandhar. Bhatia's cited case was considered per incuriam for neglecting Bank of Baroda and the withdrawal of Singapore proceedings, unlike the current ongoing UAE proceedings BNP PARIBAS SUISSE SA vs ASHOK KUMAR GOEL - Delhi.
-
Legal Proceedings and Orders - An order dated 04/02/2025 in Commercial Appeal (L) No. 14519 of 2024 involving Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia was relied upon, indicating ongoing legal engagement IMAX Corporation vs E-City Entertainment (I) Private Limited - Bombay.
-
Banking and Liquidation Cases - Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia and others, including ICICI Bank Ltd., have been involved in legal disputes concerning liquidation and banking matters, with arguments and records reviewed in such cases SRI. PARAMANAND SINGH vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka.
-
Historical and Property Disputes - Cases involving property deeds and historical figures like Tulsidas have been referenced, notably in Tulsidas Klachand v. Commissioner of Income-tax, emphasizing established legal principles in property and income tax law Sonia Bhatia VS State Of U. P. - Supreme Court.
-
Judicial Decisions on Commercial and Administrative Law - The decisions in Bhatia Metal Containers (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P. and related cases reflect interpretations of statutory and administrative law, aligning with the Allahabad High Court's rulings and emphasizing the importance of relevant case law in such disputes W. S. Industries (India) Ltd. VS Inspector of Factories - Karnataka, W. P. I. L. LTD. , GHAZIABAD VS INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES, BANGALORE - Karnataka.
-
Criminal and Investigative Proceedings - Investigations involving police reports and witness testimonies, such as those by Tulshidas Dhavaskar and Harish Bhatta, demonstrate procedural aspects of criminal cases, with references to FIR recordings and police investigations Chandan Vagurmekar VS State of Goa - Bombay.
-
Business and Property Litigation - Disputes over business operations in Lucknow and property ownership, including suits filed for reliefs related to shop premises, highlight ongoing civil litigation influenced by historical and legal contexts Kewal Krishna Khosla (D) By L. Rs. VS Additional District Judge Xivth, Lucknow and Others - Allahabad.
-
Historical and Cultural References - Tulsidas's historical role and related oral evidence were discussed in the context of religious and cultural claims, with some evidence insufficient to conclusively prove certain claims about his status or constructions attributed to him M. Siddiq (D) Thr. Lrs. VS Mahant Suresh Das - Supreme Court.
-
Accident and Personal Injury Cases - Cases involving injuries and accidents, such as those involving Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia, show the application of evidence and police reports in personal injury litigation State of Gujarat VS Bilal Ismail Abdul Majid Sujela @ Bilal Haji - Gujarat.
Analysis and Conclusion
Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia is associated with multiple legal contexts, including enforcement of international decrees, banking and liquidation disputes, property and historical claims, and criminal investigations. The legal principles established in relevant judgments emphasize the importance of considering all pertinent case law and procedural details. The references collectively illustrate Bhatia's involvement across civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings, reflecting his significant legal footprint.
References: - BNP PARIBAS SUISSE SA vs ASHOK KUMAR GOEL - Delhi - IMAX Corporation vs E-City Entertainment (I) Private Limited - Bombay - SRI. PARAMANAND SINGH vs STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka - Sonia Bhatia VS State Of U. P. - Supreme Court - W. S. Industries (India) Ltd. VS Inspector of Factories - Karnataka - W. P. I. L. LTD. , GHAZIABAD VS INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES, BANGALORE - Karnataka - Chandan Vagurmekar VS State of Goa - Bombay - Kewal Krishna Khosla (D) By L. Rs. VS Additional District Judge Xivth, Lucknow and Others - Allahabad - M. Siddiq (D) Thr. Lrs. VS Mahant Suresh Das - Supreme Court - State of Gujarat VS Bilal Ismail Abdul Majid Sujela @ Bilal Haji - Gujarat
Search Results for "Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia"
2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6917 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia 11 explicitly permitted simultaneous execution of a UAE decree in India. Likewise, the Allahabad High Court in Om Parkash v. Tahera Begam12 and the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Karnail Singh Sandhar v. ... Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia 5 cited by the Decree Holder is per incuriam, as it does not consider Bank of Baroda, and moreover, the parallel proceedings in Singapore had been withdrawn in that case, unlike the present matter wherein the UAE proceedings are ong....
2025 0 Supreme(Bom) 890 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A. S. CHANDURKAR, M. M. SATHAYE, JJ
In that regard, reliance was placed on the order dated 04/02/2025 passed in Commercial Appeal (L) No. 14519 of 2024 (Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia and another vs. ARF SV 1 Sarl) decided on 04/02/2025.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22644 • India - Karnataka High Court
Suresh Tulsidas Bhatia and Ors. (ARF SV) (iii) ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator of APS Star Industries Ltd (ICICI Bank) 13. Heard arguments and perused the record. 14.
1981 0 Supreme(SC) 187 • India - Supreme Court
A.V.VARADARAJAN, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Chunni Lal Bhatiya had two sons, Sudesh and Mahesh and a daughter Smt. Sarla. On 14-9-1969 Chunni Lal executed a registered deed of gift in respect of 110 bighas in favour of his son, Sudesh. A month later, another deed of gift was executed in favour of his son, Sudhir (sic). ... Finally, we would like to mention that the matter is no longer res integra but is fully covered in principle by a decision of this Court in Tulsidas Klachand v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay I (1961) 3 SCR 351 where Hidayatullah. ... The de....
1990 0 Supreme(Kar) 690 • India - Karnataka
S.RAJENDRA BABU
Kailashchandra and Others, (1990) 1 LLJ 486 MP and Suresh Tulsidas Kilachand and others Vs. Collector of Bombay and others, ( 1984. Lab.IC. 1614) ... 4. ... Bhatia Metal Containers (P) Ltd. v. State of U. P. (supra), does not deal with the relevant questions that have been raised in these cases. ... It was also submitted that the interpretation placed by the respondents is consistent with the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Bhatia Metal Containers (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs.
1990 0 Supreme(Kar) 211 • India - Karnataka
S.RAJENDRA BABU
C. 760) and Suresh Tulsidas kilachand and Ors,, v Collector of bombay and Ors. , (1984 LAB. I. C. 1614 ). ... Bhatia metal Containers (P) Ltd. v State of u. P (1989 LAB. I. C. 2275) does not deal with the relevant questions that have been raised in these cases. ... It was also submitted that the interpretation placed by the respondents is consistent with the decision of the Allahabad High Court in M/s Bhatia metal Containers (P) Ltd v State of up (1989 Lab. l.
2012 0 Supreme(Bom) 1642 • India - Bombay
A.P.LAVANDE
State, 1989(2) Goa L.T. (11); ... (2) Suresh Singh and others vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1999 SC 1773; ... (3) Rizan and another vs. ... Deelip Amonkar, PW.9 Tulshidas Dhavaskar and PW.10 Harish Bhatta, the Investigating Officer. ... 5. The defence of the accused was of total denial. ... First Information Report was recorded by PW.9 Tulshidas Dhavaskar in GMC, Bambolim, who handed over investigation to PW.10 PSI Harish Bhatta of Mapusa Police Station. Thereafter, scene of offence panchanama was recorded ....
2013 0 Supreme(All) 578 • India - Allahabad
SUDHIR AGARWAL
The business was to run in a shop forming part of building situate at Tulsidas Marg Chowk, Lucknow, owned by Som Nath. ... Sujan Suresh Sawant Vs. Dr. Kamlakant Shantaram Desa AIR 2004 Bom. 446, the Court came across a similar situation. ... The business was to run in a shop forming part of building situate at Tulsidas Marg Chowk, Lucknow, owned by Som Nath. He (Som Nath) instituted Suit No. 134 of 1978 seeking following reliefs: ... "1. ... Brundaban Hatia. ... 3. The plaintiff's case stands on a stronger footing from a....
2019 8 Supreme 1 • India - Supreme Court
RANJAN GOGOI, S. A. BOBDE, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, ASHOK BHUSHAN, S. ABDUL NAZEER
PW-13, Suresh Chandra Mishra, appeared on behalf of plaintiff of Suit No. 4 is a historian. ... The complaint of 25 September 1866 filed by Meer Rajab Ali Khateeb states that it is filed against one ‘Tulsidas’. Nirmohi Akhara sought to rely on oral evidence to prove that Tulsidas was in fact a Mahant of the Nirmohis and that it was Nirmohi Akhara who constructed the “Kothri”. ... The document itself does not prove that Tulsidas was a Mahant of the Nirmohis nor that the construction was carried out by the Nirmohis. ... Ap....
2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 1723 • India - Gujarat
ANANT S.DAVE, G.R.UDHWANI
In the case of Suresh v. ... (P.W.-75 Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia [injured]/Exh.610/Vol.32/Para-3/Pg.-11043 & Para-9/Pg.-11046) S-6was jam-packed with passengers (P.W.-75 Nikanth Tulsidas Bhati [injured]/Exh.-610/Para-13/Vol.-32/pg.-11047) td valign="top" style="border-left: medium none; border-right: ... Nilkanth Bhatia PW-110 Bhupat PW-118 Ashish Dave PW-114, Dilip Patel and other Gujarat Railway Police personnel viz. PW-140 Punjabhai, PW-146 Laxman Chauhan, ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
