Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A. S. CHANDURKAR, M. M. SATHAYE, JJ
IMAX Corporation – Appellant
Versus
E-City Entertainment (I) Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. Chandurkar, J.
1] This Commercial Arbitration Appeal has been filed under Section 50(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act of 1996) raising a challenge to the judgment dated 24/10/2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Commercial Arbitration Petition No.414 of 2018. The said proceedings had been filed under the provisions of Sections 47, 48 and 49 of the Act of 1996 for a declaration that three Foreign Awards passed in favour of the appellant – Imax Corporation were enforceable under the provisions of Part-II of the Act of 1996. By the impugned judgment, the learned Judge dismissed the Arbitration Petition holding the same to be barred by limitation with the further finding that the said Foreign Awards in favour of Imax Corporation did not deserve to be enforced and executed. It was also held that the impleadment of the 2nd to 4th respondents in the Arbitration Petition was unwarranted as they were not parties to the arbitration proceedings.
2] Mr. Aspi Chinoy, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant submitted that the learned Judge erred in holding that the Arbitration Petition as filed was barred by limitation. A further error was
An appeal under Section 50(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable against all respondents when the dismissal of the Arbitration Petition is intertwined with the Chamber S....
The enforceability of a foreign arbitral award under the A&C Act requires specificity in the award; vague declarations cannot be executed until all pertinent elements are resolved.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appealability of orders pertaining to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act must be determined as per the drill under Section 50 alone, and....
Sine qua non for execution of an award is existence of properties against which an order could be passed by Court.
Once an award is found to be enforceable under Section 49, it is deemed to be a decree from the date of the foreign award. Only broader principles of CPC apply to Part II of the Act.
The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards may only be refused on specific grounds as outlined in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act; violations of procedural norms do not themselves constitute a b....
The objector in enforcement proceedings of a foreign arbitration award must furnish convincing proof as mandated by Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Domestic awards from international commercial arbitration are enforceable exclusively in the High Court, not District Commercial Courts, confirming jurisdictional provisions under relevant acts.
Venue of arbitration does not equate to its jurisdictional seat; petitions under the Arbitration Act must be filed where arbitration took place, as established in prior Supreme Court rulings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
