References: - Border Security Force Act, 1968, Sections 46 and 117; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 29 SARBRAJ SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - Delhi - Section 6 of the POCSO Act Kuldeep Singh Sengar vs Central Bureau Of Investigation - Delhi - General principles on sentencing and reformation DEVENDER KUMAR ALIAS JHENGI vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS - Himachal Pradesh - Court judgments on sentence reduction but not suspension for serious offenses Shri. Shakhyajit Choudhuri vs The State of Tripura and Another - Tripura, Shri. Shakhyajit Choudhuri vs The State of Tripura and Another - Tripura
(A) Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46 and 117 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 29 - ... Whereas, in the instant matter, the quantum of punishment is five years rigorous imprisonment and the petitioner has only served about 10 months which does not make the petitioner fit for suspension of sentence on merits or on grounds of mercy. ... Regarding the application for suspension of sentence, it was observed th....
Section 6 of the POCSO Act provides for the punishment of the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault defined under a href="./.. ... for the purpose of an application seeking suspension of sentence, this Court is of the view that this issue is no longer res integra.
This reason finds justification in one of the objectives behind sentence and punishment, namely, reformation of the convict. ... There is no denying of the fact that preventive detention is not punishment and the concept of serving out a sentence would not legitimately be within the purview of preventive detention. ... Explanation.- The punishment in this section is in addition to the punishment awarded to the Prisoner for the offence for which he was convicted. 8(i). ... Rampur Busha....
Handing out punishment is not the sole form of delivering justice. Societal method of applying laws evenly is always subject to lawful exceptions. ... Since the offences were non- compoundable, the learned Additional Sessions Judge did not set aside the conviction but reduced the sentence from 3 years to 1 year. The Madhya Pradesh High Court further reduced it to the period already undergone. ... The accused were convicted of the offences with the maximum sentence under Sections 294, 323 and 326 of IPC. At the stage of ....
Handing out punishment is not the sole form of delivering justice. Societal method of applying laws evenly is always subject to lawful exceptions. ... Since the offences were non- compoundable, the learned Additional Sessions Judge did not set aside the conviction but reduced the sentence from 3 years to 1 year. The Madhya Pradesh High Court further reduced it to the period already undergone. ... The accused were convicted of the offences with the maximum sentence under Sections 294, 323 and 326 of IPC. At the stage of ....
While the word “couple” is not preceded by ‘married’, the use of “spouse” later in the sentence, rules out any other interpretation. ... She can legally enter into marriage only after attaining the age of 18 years. When a girl gets married below the age of 18 years, the persons who contract such a marriage or abet in contracting such child marriage, commit a criminal offence and are liable for punishment under the PCMA. ... For example, Section 27 of the SMA provides that a party to a marriage may present a petition for ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.