AI Overview

AI Overview...

References: - Border Security Force Act, 1968, Sections 46 and 117; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 29 SARBRAJ SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - Delhi - Section 6 of the POCSO Act Kuldeep Singh Sengar vs Central Bureau Of Investigation - Delhi - General principles on sentencing and reformation DEVENDER KUMAR ALIAS JHENGI vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS - Himachal Pradesh - Court judgments on sentence reduction but not suspension for serious offenses Shri. Shakhyajit Choudhuri vs The State of Tripura and Another - Tripura, Shri. Shakhyajit Choudhuri vs The State of Tripura and Another - Tripura

Search Results for "Suspention of Sentence in Pocso Meters where Punishment is more then 10 Years"

SARBRAJ SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6822 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

C. HARI SHANKAR, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, JJ

(A) Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46 and 117 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 29 - ... Whereas, in the instant matter, the quantum of punishment is five years rigorous imprisonment and the petitioner has only served about 10 months which does not make the petitioner fit for suspension of sentence on merits or on grounds of mercy. ... Regarding the application for suspension of sentence, it was observed th....

Kuldeep Singh Sengar vs Central Bureau Of Investigation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46210 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

Section 6 of the POCSO Act provides for the punishment of the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault defined under a href="./.. ... for the purpose of an application seeking suspension of sentence, this Court is of the view that this issue is no longer res integra.

DEVENDER KUMAR ALIAS JHENGI vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 3655 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA

This reason finds justification in one of the objectives behind sentence and punishment, namely, reformation of the convict. ... There is no denying of the fact that preventive detention is not punishment and the concept of serving out a sentence would not legitimately be within the purview of preventive detention. ... Explanation.- The punishment in this section is in addition to the punishment awarded to the Prisoner for the offence for which he was convicted. 8(i). ... Rampur Busha....

Shri. Shakhyajit Choudhuri vs The State of Tripura and Another

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tri) 188 India - High Court of Tripura

Handing out punishment is not the sole form of delivering justice. Societal method of applying laws evenly is always subject to lawful exceptions. ... Since the offences were non- compoundable, the learned Additional Sessions Judge did not set aside the conviction but reduced the sentence from 3 years to 1 year. The Madhya Pradesh High Court further reduced it to the period already undergone. ... The accused were convicted of the offences with the maximum sentence under Sections 294, 323 and 326 of IPC. At the stage of ....

Shri. Shakhyajit Choudhuri vs The State of Tripura and Another

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tri) 360 India - High Court of Tripura

Handing out punishment is not the sole form of delivering justice. Societal method of applying laws evenly is always subject to lawful exceptions. ... Since the offences were non- compoundable, the learned Additional Sessions Judge did not set aside the conviction but reduced the sentence from 3 years to 1 year. The Madhya Pradesh High Court further reduced it to the period already undergone. ... The accused were convicted of the offences with the maximum sentence under Sections 294, 323 and 326 of IPC. At the stage of ....

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty VS Union of India

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1046 India - Supreme Court

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

While the word “couple” is not preceded by ‘married’, the use of “spouse” later in the sentence, rules out any other interpretation. ... She can legally enter into marriage only after attaining the age of 18 years. When a girl gets married below the age of 18 years, the persons who contract such a marriage or abet in contracting such child marriage, commit a criminal offence and are liable for punishment under the PCMA. ... For example, Section 27 of the SMA provides that a party to a marriage may present a petition for ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top