IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ.
Kuldeep Singh Sengar – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
CRL.A. 53 of 2020
Decided On : 23-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for sentence suspension pending appeal in sexual assault conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. prosecution evidence and witness testimonies on incident and victim age. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. trial court findings on age, investigation, alibi, and public servant status. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. contentions on age discrepancy, alibi, delay, and threat factors. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. analysis of public servant definition under ipc and pocso applicability. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. rejection of aggravated offense charges under trust or dominance provisions. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. principles for sentence suspension under crpc section 389. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 8. consideration of incarceration period and speedy trial rights. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 9. grant of suspension with protective conditions for victim. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
1. The present application has been filed by the Appellant under Section 389(1) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1963 ["CrPC"] seeking regular suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal.
2. The Appellant herein has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 376 /363/366 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 ["IPC"] read with Sections 5 (c)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ["POCSO Act"] vide judgment dated 16.12.2019 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge – West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi ["learned Trial Court"] in Sessions Case No. 448/2019 arising out of FIR No. 96/2018 registered at Police Station Makhi, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh, re-registered as RC-08(S)/2018, PS CBI/ACB/Lucknow ["Impugned Judgment"]. Vide a separate order on sentence dated 20.12.2019 passed by the learned Trial Court, the Appellant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the remainder of life, along with a fine of Rs. 25,00,000/- and an additional compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- payable to the mother of the survivor. Against the Impugned Judgment as well as the Order on sentence, the Appellant has approached this Court by way of the Criminal Appeal No. 53 of 2020, which is pending adjudication.
3. For a proper adjudication of the present application seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the Appeal, this Court deems it fit to postulate the background which gives rise to the Appeal.
4. The incident of rape upon the Victim/Survivor came to be registered under Case No. SC – 448/2019 arising out of FIR No. 96/2018 at PS Makhi, Unnao under Sections 3 63 , 366, 376, 506 of the IPC and and 4 of the POCSO Act. Investigation into these allegations was handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation ["CBI"] vide a Notification dated 12.04.2018 issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh, after which a case RC 08(S)/2018 dated 12.04.2018 came to be registered in the ACB, CBI, Lucknow Branch.
5. Pertinently, apart from RC 08(S)/2018 which involved the allegation of rape upon the Victim/Survivor, the CBI was also entrusted with the investigation into the following two cases:
(i) RC 09(S)/2018 under Sections 3 23, 504, 506 IPC and /25 Arms Act, lodged against father of the Victim/Survivor; and
(ii) RC 10(S)/2018 under Sections 147, 323, 504 read with Section 302 IPC, lodged by the mother of the Victim/Survivor for the alleged assault upon her husband.
6. Subsequently, another case arising out of FIR No. 316/2018 dated 20.06.2017 under Sections 363 , 366, 376D IPC pertaining to alleged offences of kidnapping, confinement for sexual exploitation and gang rape upon the Victim/Survivor was transferred to CBI for further investigation vide Order dated 13.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in WP (PIL) 01/2018. Resultantly, RC 11(S)/2018 dated
7. A chargesheet was filed by the CBI before the Special Judge (POCSO) CBI – IV, Lucknow on 11.07.2018, which was also supplied to the Appellant as per Section 207 CrPC, an
Kashmira Singh v. State of Punjab
Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary and Anr.
Hussainara Khatoon (V) v. Home Secy., State of Bihar
Kadra Pahadiya v. State of Bihar
Legislators not 'public servants' under Section 21 IPC for POCSO aggravated offenses; sentence suspended post minimum term service pending appeal.
The appellant's conviction under the POCSO Act was upheld as the victim was underage at the time of the offense, notwithstanding the alteration in charges, which did not prejudice the appellant's def....
The court affirmed that consent is irrelevant if the victim is a minor, emphasizing that credible evidence, especially concerning age, is paramount in cases under the POCSO Act.
The court emphasized that suspension of sentence post-conviction requires strong reasons, as the presumption of innocence is no longer applicable.
A court should generally suspend a fixed-term sentence pending appeal unless exceptional circumstances indicate otherwise.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.