AI Overview...

Syrma Technology Private Limited (STPL) - Main points and insights:
STPL is a Chennai-based company engaged in manufacturing and supplying electronic products and components. It is also involved in international trade, with export activities noted from its facility in MEPZ-SEZ, Chennai, and export registration details in Sweden (e.g., SE 16440, Kista) Powerwave Technologies Sweden AB VS Syrma Technology Private Limited - Madras, Powerwave Technologies Sweden vs Syrma Technology Private - Madras.
The company has been involved in legal cases concerning intellectual property, contractual disputes, and bankruptcy proceedings, often referencing its corporate identity as Syrma Technology Private Limited Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar - Madras, Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director - Madras, M/s. SPN Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, SP. N. Krishnamoorthy, Chennai VS Sree Gokulam Hotels (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Rep. by its Director,V. C. Praveen, Chennai - Madras, Rojee-Tasha Stampings Private Ltd. VS POSCO-India Pune Processing Centre Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay, INMAD00000481084.
In legal judgments, Syrma Technology has been recognized as a significant entity in cases related to the IT Act, Trade Marks Act, and civil procedure, with courts emphasizing the burden of proof and procedural aspects under Order XIII-A of the CPC Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar - Madras, Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director - Madras, M/s. SPN Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, SP. N. Krishnamoorthy, Chennai VS Sree Gokulam Hotels (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Rep. by its Director,V. C. Praveen, Chennai - Madras.
Legal and Judicial Insights:
The courts have examined Syrma Technology's legal standing in various disputes, including those involving foreign companies like Powerwave Technologies Sweden AB, especially in bankruptcy contexts Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director - Madras, M/s. SPN Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, SP. N. Krishnamoorthy, Chennai VS Sree Gokulam Hotels (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Rep. by its Director,V. C. Praveen, Chennai - Madras, SYRMA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED vs POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES SWEDEN AB (IN BANKRUPTCY) - Supreme Court.
In judgments, Syrma Technology's cases have clarified procedural issues such as the burden of proof under Rule 3 of Order XIII-A, with courts holding that the applicant bears the initial burden, and the respondent bears it subsequently if the applicant's case is established Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar - Madras, Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director - Madras.
The company has been referenced in judgments concerning the interplay of the IT Act, Trade Marks Act, and civil procedure, indicating its active involvement in intellectual property and commercial litigation Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar - Madras.
Overall Analysis and Conclusion:
Syrma Technology Private Limited is a prominent Chennai-based electronics manufacturing and export company, with notable legal involvement in intellectual property, contractual, and bankruptcy matters.
Judicial decisions highlight its role in clarifying procedural law, especially regarding proof burdens under Order XIII-A, and affirm its status as a significant corporate entity in relevant legal contexts Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar - Madras, Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director - Madras.
Its international trade activities, including exports to Sweden, and its legal cases, underscore its active engagement in both domestic and international commercial law domains.

References:
- Powerwave Technologies Sweden AB VS Syrma Technology Private Limited - Madras, Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar - Madras, Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director - Madras, M/s. SPN Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, SP. N. Krishnamoorthy, Chennai VS Sree Gokulam Hotels (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Rep. by its Director,V. C. Praveen, Chennai - Madras, Rojee-Tasha Stampings Private Ltd. VS POSCO-India Pune Processing Centre Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay, Powerwave Technologies Sweden vs Syrma Technology Private - Madras, SYRMA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED vs POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES SWEDEN AB (IN BANKRUPTCY) - Supreme Court

Search Results for "Syrma Technology"

2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4567 • India - Madras

M.SUNDAR

Technology Private Limited for manufacture and supply of products. ... The First Defendant goes by the name 'Syrma Technology Private Limited', Chennai (hereinafter after 'STPL' for the sake of brevity) and the Second Defendant is State Bank of India, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as 'SBF for the sake of brevity). ... SE 16440, Kista, Sweden and the exporter is given as Syrma Technology Private Limited, Plot No. B27, Phase II, Zone 'B', MEPZ-SEZ Tambaram Sanatorium, Chennai-600 045, India. In other w....

Syrma Technology Private Limited, Chennai VS Powerwave Technologies Sweden AD (in bankruptcy), Rep. , by the Bankruptcy Administrator, Niklas Korling

2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 116 • India - Madras

M.M.SUNDRESH, KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Godaddy. com LLC, United States of America VS Puravankara Projects Limited, Rep by its authorized signatory John Vijayakumar

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1820 • India - Madras

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Summary Judgment - Intermediaries - Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79, Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Summary Judgment granted ... By drawing reference to the judgment in Syrma Technology Private Limited, Chennai v. ... In Syrma Technology, a Division Bench of this Court concluded that the burden of proof with regard to the first limb under Rule 3 of Order XIII-A is imposed on the applicant, whereas the burden of proof as regards the second limb is imposed on the respondent in such application. .......

Northern Arc Capital Limited, Rep. by its authorised signatory J. Veda Raguraj VS Sambandh Finserve Private Limited Rep. by its Director

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1819 • India - Madras

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

(iii) Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. Powerwave Technologies Sweden AD and Another, (2020) 4 LW 238 (Syrma Technology), wherein the Division Bench of this Court held that Order XIII-A subsumes the remedy under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC.

M/s. SPN Hotels Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, SP. N. Krishnamoorthy, Chennai VS Sree Gokulam Hotels (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Rep. by its Director,V. C. Praveen, Chennai

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2079 • India - Madras

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

In Syrma Technology Private Limited, Chennai v. ... Powerwave Technologies Sweden AB(in Bankruptcy), (2020) 8 MLJ 332 (Syrma Technology) a Division Bench of this Court concluded that the burden of proof with regard to the first limb under Rule 3 of Order XIII-A is imposed on the applicant, whereas the burden of proof as regards

Rojee-Tasha Stampings Private Ltd. VS POSCO-India Pune Processing Centre Pvt. Ltd.

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 501 • India - Bombay

NARESH H.PATIL, G.S.KULKARNI

Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. Company Petition No. 294 of 2014, order dated 22.12.2014, wherein the learned Single Judge referring to the decision as we have noted above, observed thus: ... “18............

Powerwave Technologies Sweden vs Syrma Technology Private

• India - Madras High Court

Technology Private Limited for manufacture and supply of products. ... The first defendant goes by the name 'Syrma Technology Private Limited', Chennai (hereinafter after ‘STPL’ for the sake of brevity) and the second defendant is State Bank of India, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as ‘SBI’ for the sake of brevity). ... SE 16440, Kista, Sweden and the exporter is given as Syrma Technology Private Limited, Plot No.B27, http://www.judis.nic.inPhase II, Zone 'B', MEPZ-SEZ Tambaram Sanatorium, Chennai – 6....

SYRMA TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD vs POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES SWEDE

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 12909 • India - High Court of Madras

Hon`ble Mr Justice M.M.SUNDRESH

M/S SYRMA TECHNOLOGY PVT.LTD. vs MRS MINI THOMAS

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4838 • India - Principal Bench at Bengaluru

SYRMA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED vs POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES SWEDEN AB (IN BANKRUPTCY)

• India - Supreme Court

TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUS POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES SWEDEN AB (IN BANKRUPTCY) & ANR. ... Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11019/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2020 in OSA No. 345/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras) SYRMA

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

approbate-and-reprobate-key-legal-doctrine-explained vague-threatening-phone-calls-why-they-fail-in-court does-scc-own-copyright-on-full-text-judgments g-o-ms-no-108-tn-salesman-packer-recruitment-rules article-226-vs-227-key-differences-in-high-court-powers judgments-on-one-time-gna-charges-in-india tip-judicial-vs-executive-magistrate-rules-explained can-a-sole-dissenting-member-block-society-redevelopment how-to-sue-fake-facebook-accounts-for-defamation-in-india illustrations-person-dominating-will-in-indian-law perusal-in-court-orders-what-it-means-in-law litigant-vigilance-essential-duty-in-court-proceedings what-to-do-if-company-suit-signatory-dies renting-house-without-rent-agreement-in-india-risks stay-on-money-realization-after-ejectment-is-it-possible