AI Overview...
- T N Technology Tac 1991 - Obsolete Technology and High Production Costs
- The petitioner was manufacturing Ammonium Chloride from coke using technology considered obsolete as of 1991. Despite the availability of newer, more efficient methods, the petitioner did not upgrade their plant, leading to higher production costs. The failure to adopt modern technology was a major factor in their elevated costs, and they are blameworthy for not modernizing their facilities [Hari Fertilizers
VS Union of India -
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500043503), HARI FERTILIZERS VS UNION OF INDIA - Allahabad.
-
Technology Upgradation and Benchmarking
-
The concept of technology upgradation involves adopting state-of-the-art or near-state-of-the-art technology, representing a significant improvement over existing methods. Schemes like the Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) define and benchmark technology levels to facilitate this transition Garg Acryclics Ltd. vs Union of India - Delhi.
-
Judicial and Administrative Perspectives
-
Courts and administrative bodies recognize the importance of embracing technological advancements to improve efficiency. For instance, judicial proceedings have begun integrating technology to enhance administration, although some lag behind in full adoption Rajesh Tyagi VS Jaibir Singh - Delhi.
-
Regulatory and Legal Framework
-
Several Acts, including the Public Liability Insurance Act (1991) and the Biological Diversity Act (2002), regulate environmental and safety standards in industries, which may influence decisions regarding technology upgrades. Additionally, legal cases involving officials highlight the importance of compliance with technological and procedural standards Chitra Ramkrishna vs CBI through the Investigating Officer - Kerala, SIDHARTHAN T., Vs THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - Kerala.
-
Miscellaneous References
- The sources also mention specific instances of personnel changes and legal proceedings involving government officials and institutions, underscoring the broader context of regulatory compliance and administrative accountability related to technological practices PARTHASARATHY, P. N. VS MANAGEMENT OF TUTICORIN ALKALI CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS LTD. - Madras, Chitra Ramkrishna VS Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Through the Investigating Officer - Delhi, Chitra Ramkrishna vs CBI through the Investigating Officer - Kerala.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The primary insight is that reliance on obsolete technology, such as the coke-based process for Ammonium Chloride in 1991, results in higher costs and inefficiencies. Upgrading to modern, near-state-of-the-art technology is essential for competitiveness and compliance with regulatory standards. Despite available schemes and legal frameworks encouraging such upgrades, many entities have lagged, leading to legal and administrative challenges. Embracing technological advancement is crucial for operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.
Search Results for "T N Technology Tac 1991"
2003 0 Supreme(All) 1174 • India - Allahabad
MARKANDEY KATJU, R.S.TRIPATHI
The petitioner was manufacturing Ammonium Chloride from coke which is obsolete technology as stated in the counter affidavit. It could have adopted the new technology but it did not do so. ... The obsolete technology of the petitioners was a major factor for the higher cost of production. ... It appears that the petitioner was following obsolete technology and had not modified its plant. Hence the petitioner itself is to be blamed and it cannot complain in this respect. Its cost of production was very high and the #HL_ST....
2003 0 Supreme(All) 1163 • India - Allahabad
M.KATJU, R.S.TRIPATHI
The petitioner was manufacturing Ammonium Chloride from coke which is obsolete technology as stated in the counter affidavit. It could have adopted the new technology but it did not do so. ... The obsolete technology of the petitioners was a major factor for the higher cost of production. ... It appears that the petitioner was following obsolete technology and had not modified its plant. Hence the petitioner itself is to be blamed and it cannot complain in this respect. Its cost of production was very high and the #HL_ST....
• India - Madras
P.SATHASIVAM
College of Technology, : (1981) 1 SCC 405 5. Vinayak Bhagwan Shetye Vs. M/s Kismet Pvt. Ltd. and another, : (1984) 1 LLJ 203 6. Premier Tyres Ltd., v. V.A. ... The management of the first respondent Company was taken over by SPIC in May, 1991. He was promoted as Joint General Manager (Finance) from November 1, 1993. ... Apart from this, he had also sent a letter dated February 3, 1995 to the Trustee, the TAC Employees Superannuation Fund for communication of 1/3 of the pension. The said letter has been marked as Exhibits R. 17. ... State ....
• India - Delhi High Court
C.HARI SHANKAR
(A) Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme - Ministerial Resolution No. 28/1/99-CTI dated 31st March 1999; Circular dated 30th June 2010 ... Clause 1, thereunder, contained in the "Definition of Technology Upgradation", and defined Technology Upgradation as meaning induction of state-of-the-art, or near-state-of-the-art technology, involving at least a significant step up from the existing technology. ... For this purpose, technology levels were benchmarked, in terms of the specified machi....
2022 0 Supreme(Del) 2170 • India - Delhi
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Code, 1973 - Sections 439 and 482 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 12, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) - Information Technology ... Accordingly, present FIR was got registered under sections 120-B/204 of the IPC and sections 7/12/13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the PC Act and under section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. ... The applicant/accused resigned from her position at on 02.12.2016 and was appointed as Chairperson of Malaviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT), Jaipur for a three-year term till January 2019....
2021 0 Supreme(Del) 2431 • India - Delhi
J. R. MIDHA
Geetam Tiwari, Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (vii) Prof. Venkatesh Balasubramanyam, Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (viii) Ms. ... Law may be last and lagging in embracing technology. But benefits of tapping into technology would enhance the benefits flowing from judicial administration. It may be trite to lay down the benefits as they are too well known and obvious. ... This Court chose to allow the embracing of technology already in place, for implementing the DAR re....
2022 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 63572 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sudhir Kumar Jain, J
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 12, 13(2) and 13(1)(d), Indian Penal Code - Sections 120B, 204, and Information Technology ... The applicant/accused resigned from her position at on 02.12.2016 and was appointed as Chairperson of Malaviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT), Jaipur for a three-year term till January 2019 by the Ministry of HRD, Government of India. ... regular bail in FIR bearing no RC/AC1/2018/A0011 dated 28.05.2018 registered at PS CBI/AC-I for offences punishable under Sections 120B/204 IPC and Sections 7/12/13(2) re....
2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 42628 • India - High Court of Kerala
, J
EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE STUDY REPORT DATED 159 19.6.2019 BY DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KARNATAKA, SURATHIKAL, MANGALORE. ... The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991; 7. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002. ... (2) The relief and compensation and restitution of property and environment referred to in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of sub- section (1) shall be in addition to the relief paid or payable under the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 (6 of 1991). ... PCB/TAC....
2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 19338 • India - High Court of Kerala
159 19.6.2019 BY DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ... The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991; 7. The Biological Diversity Act, 2002. ... PCB/TAC/WP/236/2006 DATED 13.06.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ... EXHIBIT R3 C A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.PCB/TAC/WP/236/2006 DATED 13.06.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 947 • India - Madras
M.THANIKACHALAM, R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Janakiammal College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, run by the family members of A.1. ... Thiru Rajasekaran-P.W.54 was working as Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore, between 1991-1995. ... By examining the Coonoor Tahsildar, Paraliyar Check Post Register was recovered where there was an entry about the crossing of the car TAC 5667. ... A.8 is the taxi driver under one Ramalingam, who has been examined as P.W.32 and the registration number of the taxi is TAC 5667. ... 76. ... Pursuant to the confession statem....
Filter by Legal Phrase
