AI Overview...
- Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd (TCIL) - Madhya Pradesh Rural Road
- The case involves a construction contract for a road project between TCIL and the Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority. The Supreme Court and High Court have examined disputes related to arbitration, adjudication of claims, and the interpretation of ascertained money.
- A significant judgment (2014) SCC 814 clarified that ascertained money refers to the amount determined by the arbitral tribunal during adjudication. Multiple references (e.g., Sermen (India) Road Makers Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation) reinforce this understanding.
- The Madhya Pradesh High Court, including Full Bench decisions, has addressed jurisdictional issues under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, and the limitation period for filing references, emphasizing that references must be made within one year of the dispute's emergence.
- In cases like Sanjay Dubey and the 2019 MPLJ 99 judgment, the court clarified the scope and limitation of arbitration references, aligning with statutory provisions.
- Overall, the legal framework and case law highlight the importance of timely arbitration and precise interpretation of claims, especially regarding ascertained money and dispute resolution under Madhya Pradesh laws.
References:
- Supreme Court judgment (2014) SCC 814
- Madhya Pradesh High Court Full Bench decisions (IND_HC_CGHC010034102016, IND_HC_CGHC010135302016)
- Case references: Sermen (India) Road Makers Pvt. Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, Sanjay Dubey v. Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority, and others.
Search Results for "Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd Madhya Pradesh Rural Road"
2013 0 Supreme(MP) 1502 • India - Madhya Pradesh
K.K.LAHOTI, SUBHASH KAKADE
Fact of the Case: The petitioner entered into a construction contract for a road project. ... Reliance has been placed on a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 9.10.2012 passed in Writ Petition No. 5925/2012 (M/s Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and another. ... Respondent, Madhya Pradesh Rural Road#....
2018 0 Supreme(MP) 610 • India - Madhya Pradesh
HEMANT GUPTA, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, SANJAY DWIVEDI
Sermen (India) Road Makers Pvt. Ltd. v. ... Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation and another) decided on 18.4.2018 was referred to, wherein it has been held that “ascertained money” means “ascertained money arrived at by the Arbitral Tribunal at the time of adjudication of the claim”. ... Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1990, a reference petition shall be entertained within one year ....
2018 0 Supreme(MP) 748 • India - Madhya Pradesh
HEMANT GUPTA, ATUL SREEDHARAN
A Full Bench of this Court in case of Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and another (A. R. ... ... Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 ... 7-A. ... The Larger Bench in a judgment reported as (2014)10 SCC 814 (State of Madhya Pradesh and another v. ... We may notice that in a judgment reported as (2008)....
2018 0 Supreme(MP) 534 • India - Madhya Pradesh
HEMANT GUPTA, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, SANJAY DWIVEDI
The Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Sermen (India) Road Makers Pvt. Ltd. v. ... Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation and Another) decided on 18.04.2018 was referred to, wherein it has been held that “ascertained money” means “ascertained money arrived at by the Arbitral Tribunal at the time of adjudication of the claim”. ... For yet another reason, this submission cannot be accepted, as the Division Bench decision in Sermen India Road#....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9279 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
In Sanjay Dubey (supra) and Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd Versus Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority And another 2019 1 MPLJ 99, full court of this high court has given an answer regarding the limitation of the reference as under:- p class= ... After applying the law laid down in Sanjay Dubey’s and Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. (supra) cases, w....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9280 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
In Sanjay Dubey (supra) and Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd Versus Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority And another 2019 1 MPLJ 99, full court of this high court has given an answer regarding the limitation of the reference as under:- p class= ... After applying the law laid down in Sanjay Dubey’s and Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. (supra) cases, w....
• India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation and Another) decided on 18.04.2018 was referred to, wherein it has been held that “ascertained money” means “ascertained money arrived at by the Arbitral Tribunal at the time of adjudication of the claim”. ... For yet another reason, this submission cannot be accepted,as the Division Bench decision in Sermen India Road Makers Pvt. Ltd.v. ... The Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Sermen (India) Road#HL....
• India - Chhattisgarh
The Full Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Telecommunications Consultants ... India Ltd. ... Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and another Development Corporation and Another “dispute” under Section 2(d) of the Madhya Pradesh p style="position:absolute;white-space
• India - Chhattisgarh
The Full Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Telecommunications Consultants ... India Ltd. ... Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and another Development Corporation and Another “dispute” under Section 2(d) of the Madhya Pradesh p style="position:absolute;white-space
2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9773 • India - High Court of Madhya Pradesh
In Sanjay Dubey (supra) and Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd Versus Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and another reported as 2019 1 MPLJ 99, full court of this court has given an answer regarding the limitation of the reference as under:- Having opined thus ... ORDER Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal The present revision petition under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniy....
Filter by Legal Phrase
