AI Overview...
-
High Courts cannot entertain petitions against Supreme Court decisions - The courts have consistently held that High Courts are not subordinate to the Supreme Court and cannot entertain writ petitions or pleas that challenge or seek to override Supreme Court judgments or orders. The jurisdiction of High Courts is limited and explicitly excludes matters that fall under the Supreme Court's authority VEERU vs VEERU - Supreme Court.
-
Jurisdiction is governed by statutory provisions and judicial precedents - The courts emphasize that legislative exclusions, statutory timelines, and Supreme Court directives restrict the High Courts from intervening in matters already settled by the Supreme Court. For instance, when the Supreme Court has dismissed a petition or appeal, the High Court cannot entertain subsequent petitions seeking similar relief Shaheen Zainab VS Government Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh, Malik Khan S/o. Sh. Sadeek Khan VS Chief Commissioner GST And Central Excise, (Jaipur Zone), Jaipur - Rajasthan.
-
Dismissal of petitions in limine by the Supreme Court signifies the court's refusal to entertain such petitions at the threshold, and High Courts are bound by these rulings, preventing them from re-examining the same issues Jagat Bandhu Mahapatra VS The State Of Jharkhand - Jharkhand.
-
Supreme Court's authoritative rulings limit High Court jurisdiction - The Supreme Court's judgments establish that only it has the authority to entertain certain types of petitions, such as special leave petitions or review applications, once dismissed or decided, and High Courts cannot bypass these rulings Prabhat Ranjan Deo vs Union Public Service Commission - Delhi, Adeel Ahmad Khan vs State Of U.P. - Allahabad.
-
Specific case examples reinforce that High Courts dismiss petitions based on Supreme Court directives - Whether challenging executive appointments, legislative exclusions, or procedural errors, the courts have dismissed petitions when they conflict with Supreme Court decisions or legislative mandates Vimlesh Agnihotri VS State - Delhi, U. P. Judicial Services Association VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Vijay VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Legal principles governing review and appeal - Once an appeal is filed and dismissed before the Supreme Court, the jurisdiction to entertain review petitions is lost, reaffirming the finality of Supreme Court decisions and limiting subsequent High Court interventions Adeel Ahmad Khan vs State Of U.P. - Allahabad.
Analysis and Conclusion: The overarching principle is that the High Court's jurisdiction is subordinate and limited by the Supreme Court's rulings and statutory provisions. The courts have consistently dismissed petitions that seek to challenge or bypass Supreme Court decisions, emphasizing the finality and exclusive authority of the Supreme Court in such matters. Therefore, the High Court cannot entertain petitions that have been dismissed by the Supreme Court, maintaining the hierarchy and integrity of the judicial system multiple references.
Search Results for "The High Court Cannot Entertain the Petition Dismissed the Supreme Court"
2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1305 • India - Supreme Court Of India
Ratio Decidendi: High Courts are not subordinate courts of the Supreme Court of India and therefore cannot entertain writ ... Finding of the Court: The court held that it cannot entertain the prayer made in the writ petition as High Courts are ... Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed. ... In that view of the matter, there cannot....
1993 0 Supreme(AP) 337 • India - Andhra Pradesh
I.P.RAO
Finding of the Court: The court dismissed the petition, holding that the jurisdiction of the High Court is excluded ... 227 cannot be exercised to counteract the legislative exclusion of appeal or revision to any Court other than the Supreme Court. ... JURISDICTION - TERRORIST AND DISRUPTIVE ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT - The court dismissed a petition filed un....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 408 • India - Rajasthan
VIJAY BISHNOI, PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
per law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in Assistant Commissioner - Writ petition is hereby dismissed ... Court cannot disregard statutory period for redressal of grievance and entertain writ petition of such a party as a matter of course ... - High Court does not mean that it would issue a writ which may be inconsistent with legislative intent regarding the dispensation ... In view of the above discus....
2021 0 Supreme(Del) 1222 • India - Delhi
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the court declined to entertain it based on the mandate of the Supreme Court ... Supreme Court judgments. ... of the offence of rape and the societal impact, citing various Supreme Court judgments. ... With these observations the petition is dismissed. ... In view of the mandate of the Supreme Court#HL....
2022 0 Supreme(All) 669 • India - Allahabad
and, therefore, Court are of considered opinion that this Court cannot entertain present writ petition - Writ petition dismissed ... suffers from any illegality or infirmity – Held, petitioners are in effect seeking implementation of directions issued by Hon'ble Supreme ... Higher Judicial Service Rule 1975 - Rule 6 (ii), 5 (a) , 20(2) - Source of recruitment – Power of High court to issue writs - Whether ... Accor....
2007 0 Supreme(Jhk) 850 • India - Jharkhand
N.N.TIWARI
entertained by high court – petition dismissed. ... remedy – writ petition dismissed by supreme court in limine without affording permission to file u/r 226, the same should not be ... Constitution of India – Article 226 r/w section 3 (q) (v) of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 – Writ petition against order of ... When a writ petition is dismissed in limine by the Supreme #HL_S....
• India - Delhi High Court
JYOTI SINGH
... ... Findings of Court: ... High Court cannot entertain petition regarding executive appointments of All India Services as matters ... Supreme Court directed him to approach the High Court, leading to this petition questioning jurisdiction. ... ... ... Result: Petition dismissed. ... It is clear that after the authoritative pronouncement of the Constituti....
2015 0 Supreme(P&H) 1293 • India - Punjab and Haryana
K.KANNAN
The judgment referenced various legal provisions such as Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC and interpretations from previous Supreme Court ... judgments on the effect of dismissal of special leave petitions and the power of the court to correct clerical errors. ... The court analyzed the error and the objections raised by the landowners regarding the review petitions and the dismissal of their ... Once special leave is granted the jurisdiction to consider the validity of the High#HL....
1994 0 Supreme(P&H) 728 • India - Punjab and Haryana
HARPHUL SINGH BRAR
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition filed by the company and its Managing Director challenging the order of the ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the company and its Managing Director had violated the provisions of Sections ... The court also held that the courts below did not err in framing charges against the company and its Managing Director under Sections ... It has been so held by various authorities of this Court as well as the #HL_S....
2025 0 Supreme(All) 20 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Court to entertain a review petition is lost once an appeal has been preferred before the Supreme Court. ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that once an appeal is filed and dismissed, the jurisdiction to entertain a review application ... (Paras 9, 12) ... ... (C) Maintainability of review applications - Review applications cannot ... (vi) On an appeal having been preferred or a petition seeking leave....
Filter by Legal Phrase
