AI Overview...
- Vasudeva Murthy - Legal Principles and Case Law
- The case Vasudeva Murthy, (2010) 3 SCC 353, discusses the relevance of the principle of per incuriam in the context of precedents, emphasizing that it has no application where the Supreme Court's decision is binding Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd. VS National Federation of Telecom Employees BSNL, rep. by Chennai Circle Secretary - Madras.
- The case involved disputes over property rights within a joint family, with the Court ruling that Vasudeva Murthy had no right to execute a sale deed, as the property was purchased out of a joint family nucleus including his son Venkata Krishna and his wife, with rights also claimed by the wife and daughter G. RAMA VS T. G. SESHAGIRI RAO (DEAD) BY LRS. - Uttarakhand.
- The Court examined whether the Hindu Succession Act applied and clarified that Vasudeva Murthy's rights were limited, especially after the death of his husband, indicating that the legal heirs' rights depend on specific facts and applicable statutes G. Rama VS T. G. Seshagiri Rao (D) by Lrs. - Supreme Court.
- In property disputes, the Court has upheld the validity of notices and lease terminations, ruling that defective notices do not necessarily nullify tenancy termination, as seen in cases where legal notices were contested U. P. Jayaram VS K. Leelavathi Rai Since dead by L. Rs. - Karnataka.
- The case also touched upon procedural aspects in execution proceedings, emphasizing that applications are not premature if filed within the proper legal framework, referencing earlier judgments such as AIR 1963 Kerala 163 NAVANEETHAMMA VS ADAMMA - Karnataka.
- Vasudeva Murthy's case has been cited in arbitration and administrative law contexts, reinforcing principles related to judicial review and procedural correctness G. C. Kanungo VS Rourkela Steel Plant - Orissa, A. B. K. Prasad VS Union of India - Telangana.
- The Supreme Court discussed the application of FR 22 in pay scale benefits, affirming that benefits are granted based on specific eligibility criteria, and higher scales are not automatically extended to juniors Union of India VS Draughtsmens Cartographic Association Survey of India - Delhi.
- The case has also been referenced in pension regulation contexts, emphasizing the importance of timely exercise of options for pension benefits P. D. Nanaiah VS Vijaya Bank - Karnataka.
- In property inheritance, the Court recognized Vasudeva Janardanam as the adopted son of Syamalamba's husband, establishing his rights as heir, which underscores the importance of proper adoption procedures in inheritance disputes Chatrathi Jagannadha Rao VS M/s. Jatmal Madanlal Jakotia Firm - Andhra Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion
Vasudeva Murthy's case broadly addresses property rights within joint families, procedural correctness in legal notices and execution, and the application of statutory laws like the Hindu Succession Act. It underscores the importance of clear legal procedures, proper adherence to statutory provisions, and the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments. The case has served as a reference point in property disputes, administrative law, and inheritance issues, illustrating the nuanced application of legal principles in diverse contexts.
Search Results for "Vasudeva Murthy Legal Case"
2010 0 Supreme(Mad) 4569 • India - Madras
ELIPE DHARMA RAO, K.K.SASIDHARAN
Vasudeva Murthy, (2010) 3 SCC 353, Pondicherry Khadi & Village Industries Board v. P. ... Vasudeva Murthy and Pondicherry Khadi & Village Industries Board v. P. Kulothangan. ... Vasudeva Murthy and Pondicherry Khadi & Village Industries Board v. P. Kulothangan to support its decision. ... Vasudeva Murthy, (2010) 3 SCC 353 = 2010(2) Scale 232, observed that the principle of per incurium has relevance to the doctrine of precedents but has no applicatio....
2008 5 Supreme 187 • India - Supreme Court
ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Seshagiri Rao who after his death had been substituted by his legal heirs, had filed a suit with inter alia prayer to declare him ... (Para 22) ... Facts of the case : ... & ... Section 14(1), Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is not applicable in the case ... Vasudeva Murthy has no right to execute the sale deed and that Vasudeva Murthy purchased the suit schedule property along with the plaintiff out of the joint family nucleus and that joint family had consisted of #HL_ST....
2008 0 Supreme(UK) 289 • India - Uttarakhand
ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Vasudeva Murthy has no right to execute the sale deed and that Vasudeva Murthy purchased the suit schedule property along with the plaintiff out of the joint family nucleus and that joint family had consisted of Vasudeva Murthy and his son Venkata Krishna, the deceased husband of the defendant. ... According to her, after the death of her husband, she and her daughter Soumya were also having equal rights along with Vasudeva Murthy. ... On 8.3.1981, p....
2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 172 • India - Karnataka
V.GOPALA GOWDA
Fact of the Case: The Plaintiff filed a suit for possession of property and mesne profits, claiming that the Defendant ... Vasudeva Murthy L.S.) in support of the contention by the learned Counsel for the Defendant that the quit notice got issued to the Defendant was defective and therefore the tenancy of the Defendant in respect of the suit schedule property is not determined. ... The further case of the Plaintiff is that she terminated the lease by issuing legal notice dated 20.6.1988 but the Defend....
1993 0 Supreme(Kar) 140 • India - Karnataka
A.J.SADASHIVA
Fact of the Case: The petitioners are the legal representatives of the judgment-debtor in execution application No. ... of Kerala in the case of andi vasudeva v bhagavathi pilial vasudeva pillai, AIR 1963 Kerala 163. ... This is what has been done in this case. Hence the contention of Sri rama murthy that the application is premature and therefore liable to be rejected, fails. ... ... ( 15 ) TECHNICALLY Sri rama murthy may be right. ... ... ( 19 ) THE next content....
2011 0 Supreme(Ori) 139 • India - Orissa
V.GOPALA GOWDA
Vasudeva Murthy and others etc., (2010) 3 SCC 353. ... 17. Mr. Rath, learned Sr. Counsel further stated that the present Misc. ... Case No. 57 of 2009 for recalling the order dated 20.5.2009 passed in ARBP No.65 of 2008 and order dated 3.9.2009 passed in Misc. Case Nos. 23 and 24 of 2009 arising out of the said arbitration petition urging various factual and legal grounds. ... In view of the aforesaid legal contentions, Mr. Rath, learned Sr. Counsel contends that the order dated 20.5.2....
2024 0 Supreme(Telangana) 439 • India - Telangana
ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
(Paras 31, 50) Facts of the case: The petitioners alleged that the Government of Andhra Pradesh entered into ... B.R.Vasudeva Murthy, (2010) 3 SCC 353, M.Nagabhushana vs. State of Karnataka, (2011) 3 SCC 408 and Union of India vs. Major S.P.Sharma, (2014) 6 SCC 351). 32. ... In the backdrop of aforesaid legal principles, we may now advert to the facts of the case in hand. Admittedly, Smt Y.S.Vijaya, w/o late Sri Y.S.Rajasekhara Reddy, former Chief Minister of erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh had filed....
2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5573 • India - Delhi
V. KAMESWAR RAO, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Vasudev Murthy (2010) 9 SCC 30 - The court discussed the application of FR 22 ... Vasudev Murthy (2010) 9 SCC 30 in the context of granting pay scale benefits ... Fact of the Case: The Union of India challenged the order of the Central Administrative ... Vasudev Murthy (supra). ... Vasudev Murthy (supra), squarely covers the case and this Court was also of the view that the grant of higher scale to the juniors in ....
2017 0 Supreme(Kar) 1647 • India - Karnataka
R.S.CHAUHAN
In the case of B.V. Narayana Murthy v. ... Deputy General Manager, Punjab National Bank and Others (supra) and Vasudeva Sheena Karkera v. ... In the case of B.V. Narayana Murthy v. Deputy General Manager, Punjab National Bank and Others (supra) and Vasudeva Sheena Karkera v. ... In case the option is not exercised within the limited time frame, then the employee cannot be granted the benefit of pension under the Regulations. In order to buttress this plea, the learned....
1957 0 Supreme(AP) 92 • India - Andhra Pradesh
CHANDRA REDDY, QAMAR HASAN
Whether Vasudeva Janardanam was the adopted son of Syamalamba's husband? 3. ... The court also found that Vasudeva Janardanam was the adopted son of Syamalamba's husband and was therefore the rightful heir to ... Suryanarayanai died in 1927, and her adopted son, Vasudeva Janardanam, claimed the properties as the reversionary heir of Syamalamba's ... The case as set up against them was that neither they nor their father even had any title to or possession of the disputed property or any other property inherited by #HL_STA....
Filter by Legal Phrase
