Back
ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
A. B. K. Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. Prabhakar Sripada, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. K.Raghunatha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners in P.I.L.No.135 of 2012.
Mr. Gandra Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner in P.I.L.No.161 of 2012.
Mr. B. Narasimha Sharma, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the respondents No.1, 3 and 6 in P.I.L.No.135 of 2012 and for respondent No.1 in P.I.L.No.161 of 2012.
Ms. Divya Adepu, learned Special Government Pleader for respondent No.2 in both the petitions.
Mr. Srinivas Kapatia, learned Special Public Prosecutor for Central Bureau of Investigation for respondent No.4 in both the petitions.
Mr. Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Peri Prabhakar, learned counsel for respondent No.5 in both the petitions.
Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Vimal Varma Vasireddy, learned counsel for the newly impleaded respondent No.7 in P.I.L.No.135 of 2012 and respondent No.6 in P.I.L.No.161 of 2012 (hereinafter referred to as, “the newly impleaded respondent”).
2. In P.I.L.No.135 of 2012, the petitioners seek a direction to the Union of India to issue a notifi
Public interest litigations must be genuine and not motivated by personal agendas; previous judgments on similar issues bind the parties, barring new petitions.
Public interest litigation must serve a genuine public cause; courts should not direct CBI investigations unless grave public interest and no alternative remedies exist.
Point of Law : Courts must do justice by promotion of good faith, and prevent law from crafty invasions. Courts must maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice....
(1) Public Interest Litigations – What is of crucial significance in a Public Interest Litigation is bona fide of petitioner who files PIL – It is an extremely relevant consideration and must be exam....
A challenge to a long-standing notification under the Muslim Wakfs Act after an undue delay is impermissible, reinforcing the finality of administrative actions.
It is no more res integra that exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash a criminal proceeding is only when an allegation made in the FIR or the charge-sheet constitutes the ingredients of....
Point of law : . Merely because allegations are levelled against the Hon'ble Chief Minister and others and in as much as the allegations relate to abuse of power, it cannot be contended that the natu....
Public Interest Litigation requires genuine public interest and appropriate standing; repeated petitions without addressing prior judicial concerns are not maintainable.
Public interest litigants must have clean hands and credible credentials, and the courts must validate claims to prevent frivolous petitions, while retaining the sanctity of public interest litigatio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
