AI Overview...
-
Venuranganath - Central figure in multiple legal cases involving UCO Bank's disciplinary proceedings and judgments related to employment disputes Kapilendratripathy VS Union Of India - Orissa, Kuldeep Raj Sharma VS General Manager, Canara Bank - Delhi, Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, Khammam VS Mandulla Beerappa - Andhra Pradesh, Kanwar Amninder Singh VS Honble High Court of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India VS Mukesh Gang - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Legal Proceedings & Judgments:
- The Supreme Court and High Court decisions have extensively examined UCO Bank's disciplinary regulations, particularly the Manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters, and their application to Venuranganath's case Kuldeep Raj Sharma VS General Manager, Canara Bank - Delhi, Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, Khammam VS Mandulla Beerappa - Andhra Pradesh, Kanwar Amninder Singh VS Honble High Court of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand.
-
Notably, the Supreme Court in General Manager, UCO Bank and Anr. v. M. Venuranganath (AIR 2008 SC 732) held that certain disciplinary proceedings were liable to be set aside due to procedural irregularities and misapplication of regulations Kuldeep Raj Sharma VS General Manager, Canara Bank - Delhi.
-
Regulations & Manual:
- UCO Bank's disciplinary regulations, especially Regulation 15(2) and Clauses 21(9) and 22(8) of the Manual, are pivotal in determining the legality and validity of disciplinary actions against employees like Venuranganath Kapilendratripathy VS Union Of India - Orissa, GENERAL MANAGER, UCO BANK VS M. VENURANGANATH - Supreme Court.
-
The Manual's specific wording and procedural provisions have been critical in judicial assessments, with courts emphasizing adherence to these guidelines Kapilendratripathy VS Union Of India - Orissa.
-
Key Insights:
- Courts have consistently relied on the Manual and Regulations to scrutinize disciplinary proceedings, often setting aside orders found to be procedurally flawed Kuldeep Raj Sharma VS General Manager, Canara Bank - Delhi, UCO Bank, Calcutta VS M. Venuranganath - Andhra Pradesh.
-
The jurisprudence underscores that violations of prescribed disciplinary procedures can render proceedings void and illegal, as seen in the Supreme Court's decision favoring Venuranganath Kuldeep Raj Sharma VS General Manager, Canara Bank - Delhi.
-
Analysis & Conclusion:
- Venuranganath's case exemplifies the importance of strict compliance with disciplinary regulations and procedural fairness in employment disputes within public sector banks.
- Judicial decisions have favored employees when procedural lapses or misinterpretations of disciplinary rules are identified, reaffirming the necessity for authorities to adhere to established guidelines Kapilendratripathy VS Union Of India - Orissa, Kuldeep Raj Sharma VS General Manager, Canara Bank - Delhi.
References: - Supreme Court judgment in General Manager, UCO Bank and Anr. v. M. Venuranganath (AIR 2008 SC 732) - Disciplinary Regulations of UCO Bank (Manual and Regulations, 1976) - Various High Court decisions interpreting UCO Bank's disciplinary procedures and their application to Venuranganath's case
Search Results for "Venuranganath Uco"
2022 0 Supreme(Ori) 62 • India - Orissa
S.MURALIDHAR, R.K.PATTANAIK
Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 - Clause-21 (9) and 22 (8) of the Manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters of UCO ... of UCO Bank. ... Venuranganath) and the decision dated 31st July 2015 in Civil Appeal No.811 of 2007 (Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India). On the other hand, Mr. Tripathy, learned CGC appearing for the Opposite Parties placed reliance on the decision in Union of India v. ... As regards the decision in General Manager, UCO Bank (supra), it appears to have turned on the specific wording of Reg....
2007 0 Supreme(SC) 1590 • India - Supreme Court
ARIJIT PASAYAT, AFTAB ALAM
United Commercial Bank (Conduct and Discipline and Appeal) Regulation, 1976 - Manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters of UCO ... A manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters of UCO bank governed the case and not Regulation 15 (2) of the United commercial Bank (Conduct and Discipline and Appeal) Regulation, 1976.
2002 0 Supreme(AP) 880 • India - Andhra Pradesh
GHULAM MOHAMMED, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Employment and Service matter - UCO bank Officer Employees (Discipline and appeal) Regulations 1976 - Regulation ... ... ( 7 ) AGGRIEVED by the said order, the present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-UCO Bank. ... ( 8 ) HEARD Sri K. ... A. to declare as void, without jurisdiction and illegal the commencement of proceedings under Regulation 6 of the UCO bank Officer Employees (Discipline and appeal) Regulations 1976, in pursuance of the communication of the 2nd respondent bearing ref. No. ... SZ/vig/94/353 dated July 30, 1947....
2010 0 Supreme(Del) 149 • India - Delhi
KAILASH GAMBHIR
In support of her arguments counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in General Manager, UCO Bank and Anr. vs. M. Venuranganath AIR 2008SC 732 . ... 4. ... Taking into consideration the judgment of the Apex Court in General Manager, UCO Bank and Another (Supra) and the aforesaid position, I am of the considered view that the impugned orders dated 20.7.2002 and 28.10.2004 are liable to be set aside.
2002 0 Supreme(AP) 1292 • India - Andhra Pradesh
DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, S.R.NAYAK
Harendra arao and UCO Bank, Calculatta v. M. Venuranganath.
2013 0 Supreme(Del) 30 • India - Delhi
DURREZ AHMED, V.K.JAIN
Venuranganath: 2007 (13) SCC 251. ... 3. Before we examine the rival contentions of the parties, it would be relevant to notice some facts. The respondent Kuldeep Raj Sharma was working with the appellant. ... The reliance by the learned single Judge on the Supreme Court decision in General Manager, UCO Bank (supra) is also misplaced. The Supreme Court in the said decision had ultimately held in favour of the respondent therein because of clause 22(8) of the said UCO Bank Manual. ... This has been so held by the Supreme Court in General....
2019 0 Supreme(UK) 371 • India - Uttarakhand
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
UCO Bank and Another vs. M. Venuranganath, (2002) 5 ALT 162 (D.B.) and C. Pattabhirama Sastry vs. Bank of Baroda, (1998) 4 ALT 803.
• India - Supreme Court
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT,AFTAB ALAM
Venuranganath DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/2007 PETITIONER: General Manager, UCO ... A Manual on Disciplinary Action and Related Matters of UCO p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0
2016 0 Supreme(AP) 467 • India - Andhra Pradesh
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
In any event, no prejudice has been caused to the delinquent thereby and, as held in UCO Bank and another v. M.Venuranganath (2002 (5) ALT 162 (D.B.) and C.Pattabhirama Sastry v.
2020 0 Supreme(Cal) 606 • India - Calcutta
SHEKHAR B SARAF
Muddiah, (2007) 7 SCC 689 , General Manager, UCO Bank vM. ... Venuranganath, (2007) 13 SCC 251 , Raj Narain v- Union of India, 2019 5 SCC 809 ; the Division Bench decision of this Court in The Naba Ballygunge Mahavidyala v- Goutam Basu,2018 4 CHN(CAL) 225 and Single Bench decision of this Court in Purnendu Kumar
Filter by Legal Phrase
