AI Overview...
- Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. - Legal Disputes and Cases
- Unregistered Power of Attorney and Agreement: Vinod Singhvi executed an unregistered power of attorney and agreement to sell the subject property in favor of Respondent No.1, authorized Mr. Mahaveer Lunia, leading to legal proceedings including a decree for possession and injunctions to prevent unauthorized alienation or construction (Source Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. VS Mahaveer Lunia - Supreme Court).
- Court Cases and Legal Proceedings: The company has been involved in multiple legal cases, including those filed by the State of Rajasthan and other entities, highlighting ongoing legal scrutiny and disputes related to property and development activities (Sources Varaha Infra Limited VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, File No. F.15(204)RJRERA C 2020 Suo Moto Versus Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. - Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Vinod Jaiswal vs OZONE URBANA INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED - Real Estate Regulatory Authority, etc.).
- RERA Involvement: The Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority has suo-moto proceedings against Vinod Infra Developers Ltd., indicating regulatory oversight and compliance issues in their development projects (Source File No. F.15(204)RJRERA C 2020 Suo Moto Versus Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. - Real Estate Regulatory Authority).
- Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court in VINOD INFRA DEVELOPERS LTD. v. MAHAVEER LUNIA & ORS. (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1208) addressed key legal points regarding property rights, authority to sell, and contractual validity, emphasizing the importance of registered documents and proper authorization in property transactions (Source Nalina Bai, D/o. Late Sharada Bai vs Vishwanath Singh, S/o. Late Bapu Singh - Karnataka).
Analysis and Conclusion:
Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. is embroiled in legal disputes primarily concerning unauthorized property transactions, regulatory compliance, and property rights. The company's legal history underscores the importance of proper registration and authorization in property dealings and highlights ongoing oversight by authorities like RERA and the judiciary to ensure lawful development practices.
Search Results for "Vinod Infra Developers"
2025 6 Supreme 457 • India - Supreme Court
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Vinod Singhvi executed unregistered power of attorney and agreement to sell in favour of Respondent No.1, concerning the subject property. 3.2. ... Vinod Singhvi, and authorised representative Mr. Mahaveer Lunia (Respondent No.1), to sell the subject property. Pursuant to the said Board resolution, on 24.05.2014, Mr. ... Further, a decree for possession was prayed for, along with a permanent injunction restraining Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Respondent No. 7 (developer) from alienating, altering, or undertaking any construction or agricult....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 689 • India - Rajasthan
NUPUR BHATI
State of Rajasthan (SBCWP 14541/2019); Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan (SBCWP 2936/2021). 31. ... The learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on the case of Ashiana Amar Developers v. ... The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner company -Varaha Infra Limited is a public limited Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and has its registered office at Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
• India - Real Estate Regulatory Authority
THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR Suo Moto Versus Vinod Infra Developers Ltd. ... Respondent File No.
2024 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 2177 • India - Real Estate Regulatory Authority
2024 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 1457 • India - Real Estate Regulatory Authority Karnataka
2024 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 1126 • India - Real Estate Regulatory Authority Karnataka
2024 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 1942 • India - Real Estate Regulatory Authority
2022 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 1243 • India - Real Estate Regulatory Authority
• India - High Court for the State of Telangana
2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 96 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
The Apex Court in VINOD INFRA DEVELOPERS LTD. v. MAHAVEER LUNIA & ORS., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1208, at paragraphs 8, 9.5, 9.6 and 9.7, has held as follows: "8.
Filter by Legal Phrase
