AI Overview...

Vishwambhar and others vs. Sunanda (2001) 6 SCC 163 - Main points and insights:
The court held that a claim for specific performance is not maintainable by developers under Section 14(3)(c)(iii) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
Limitation was a key consideration in this judgment, affecting the maintainability of such claims Vishwambhar s/o Namdev Nikam vs Sow. Sunanda w/o Maheshankar Suryawanshi - Bombay.
Sunanda Das & Anr. - Main points and insights:
An incident involving Sunanda and her relative Sunanda Tambe in Poddar Hospital after an event on 03.03.1993, with evidence of her travel from Dubai to Bombay (PW-212).
The disembarkation card and travel details were proved, establishing her presence in India post-return Yakub Abdul Razak Memon VS State of Maharashtra, through CBI , Bombay - Supreme Court.
Sunanda Ganpatrao Khandekar - Main points and insights:
Mentioned as a petitioner in a writ petition, with details about her residence and age.
Specific insights are limited, but it indicates her involvement in legal proceedings SUNANDA BABANRAO BARDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS - Bombay.
Sunanda Avinash Rathod - Main points and insights:
Identified as a Secretary, with multiple references indicating her age (39 years) and association with Vishwambhar.
Her role appears significant in the context of legal and administrative proceedings BHAGWAN BABA JEEVANDHARA PRATISHTHAN THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VISHWAMBHAR RAMCHANDRARAO DARADE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS - Bombay, JIJAMATA MAHILA VA BAL VIKAS PRATISHTHAN KANGTHI THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MEENATAI UTTAMRAO KANGTHIKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS - Bombay, NAVODAYA GRAMIN NAGARI VIKAS PRATISTHAN VA SANSKURTIC MANDAL PATHARDI THR ITS PRESIDENT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS - Bombay, Sunanda Avinash Rathod Age: 39 years, Occu.: Secretary.
Vishwambhar Sunderdas Badlani vs. Indian Bank & Ors. - Main points and insights:
A case decided by the National Commission involving Vishwambhar Sunderdas Badlani.
Specific details about the case are not provided, but it indicates Vishwambhar's involvement in financial or banking disputes VYANKATESHWARA INFRASTRUCTURE AND VYANKATESHWAR CONSTRUCTION THROUGH SHRIKANT S/O SUBRAMANIAM IYER vs Smt.Sunanda Parchaki - Consumer State.
Handwriting Evidence involving Sunanda Dange and Ulhas S. Athale:
Sunanda Dange, a handwriting expert, examined a case on 26.04.2019.
The court considered whether alienations made by guardians are void or voidable, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Vishwambhar (2001) 6 SCC 163, emphasizing the importance of limitation and procedural aspects in such cases Kashiram S/o. Shobhitram VS Parvati Shivare W/o. Rajendra Shivare - Chhattisgarh.

Analysis and Conclusion: The references collectively depict Sunanda as a figure involved in various legal contexts, including property disputes, procedural limitations, and personal incidents. Vishwambhar appears as a significant name associated with legal proceedings, possibly related to financial matters or guardianship issues. The landmark judgment in Vishwambhar (2001) highlights the importance of limitation in claims for specific performance and the legal intricacies surrounding guardianship and alienation. Overall, Sunanda's involvement spans personal, legal, and procedural domains, with key insights into the legal principles governing guardianship, property rights, and procedural limitations.

References: - INDBOM00000128852 - 00100052661 - IND_HC_HCBM030482422018 - INDBOM00000078374 - IND_NCDRC_A_16_41 - 01000010123

Search Results for "Vishwambhar Va Sunanda"

Vishwambhar s/o Namdev Nikam vs Sow. Sunanda w/o Maheshankar Suryawanshi

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6656 • India - High Court of Bombay

SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J

Twilight Properties Pvt. Ltd. VS Supratik Bhattacharjee

2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 776 • India - Calcutta

SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

Sunanda Das & Anr.], wherein it was held by this court that a claim for specific performance was not maintainable at the instance of the developers under Section 14(3)(c)(iii) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. ... In this context, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 1 to 3 places reliance on a judgment reported at (2001) 6 SCC 163 [Vishwambhar and others vs. ... Limitation was the main consideration in the said judgment, as would be evident from the judgments relied on in the judgment of Van Vibhag (supra) itself, being (2001) 6 SCC 163 [....

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon VS State of Maharashtra, through CBI , Bombay

2013 0 Supreme(SC) 270 • India - Supreme Court

B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM

However, after gaining consciousness, she found herself and her relative Sunanda Tambe, who had been in her house on the said day, in Poddar Hospital. ... The Immigration Officer, Vishambhar Yadavrao Mitke (PW-212) proved the Disembarkation card given by A-32 at the time of arrival in Bombay from Dubai on 03.03.1993. The depositions of PWs-215 and 212 establish that A-32 left India on 11.02.1993 for Dubai and returned on 03.03.1993.

SUNANDA BABANRAO BARDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

• India - Bombay

Sunanda Ganpatrao Khandekar, WRIT PETITION NO. 14277 OF 2018 Sunanda ... Smita Vishambhar Mehakar, Age. 42 years, Occu.

BHAGWAN BABA JEEVANDHARA PRATISHTHAN THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VISHWAMBHAR RAMCHANDRARAO DARADE AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

• India - Bombay

Sunanda Avinash Rathod Age: 39 years, Occu.: Secretary, Through its Secretary Vishwambhar

VYANKATESHWARA INFRASTRUCTURE AND VYANKATESHWAR CONSTRUCTION THROUGH SHRIKANT S/O SUBRAMANIAM IYER vs Smt.Sunanda Parchaki

• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Vishwambhar Sunderdas Badlani Vs. Indian Bank & 3 Ors. decided by Hon’ble National Commission on 28.09.2007. ... Smt.Sunanda ParchakiPLOT NO.116,AADIVASI COLONY,MANEWADA ROAD,NAGPURNAGPUR2.

Kashiram S/o. Shobhitram VS Parvati Shivare W/o. Rajendra Shivare

2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 82 • India - Chhattisgarh

GOUTAM BHADURI, N. K. CHANDRAVANSHI

At the same time, she filed the report of hand writing expert Sunanda Dange whereas the defendant has also filed the report of hand-writing expert Ulhas S. Athale. The handwriting expert Sunanda (P.W.3) was examined on 26.04.2019. ... Further in case of Vishwambhar (2001) 6 SCC 163 (supra), the Supreme Court had an occasion to deal with similar question that in such circumstances whether the alienation made by the guardian is void or voidable.

JIJAMATA MAHILA VA BAL VIKAS PRATISHTHAN KANGTHI THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MEENATAI UTTAMRAO KANGTHIKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

• India - Bombay

Sunanda Avinash Rathod Age: 39 years, Occu.: Secretary, Through its Secretary Vishwambhar

NAVODAYA GRAMIN NAGARI VIKAS PRATISTHAN VA SANSKURTIC MANDAL PATHARDI THR ITS PRESIDENT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

• India - Bombay

Sunanda Avinash Rathod Age: 39 years, Occu.: Secretary, Through its Secretary Vishwambhar

JAISHANKAR GRAMIN VA ADIWASI VIKAS SANSTHA SANGAMNER THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad

Sunanda Avinash Rathod Age: 39 years, Occu.: Secretary, Through its Secretary Vishwambhar

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?