AI Overview...
- Grounds for Dismissal under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC - Main points and insights:
- Lack of Grounds for Injunction: Applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 are dismissed if the applicant fails to demonstrate sufficient grounds, such as a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury (e.g., Abdul Gaffar VS Narendra Kumar - Rajasthan, Aam Janta Somesar VS Vijay Raj M. Parmar - Rajasthan, B. S. Keshava Murthy S/o Late B. S. Sriangachar VS B. K. Prasad - Karnataka).
- Failure to Prove Irreparable Injury: Courts require proof of imminent and irreparable harm; failure to do so leads to dismissal (e.g., KITTAMMA VS B. SUBBA RAI - Karnataka, Abdul Gaffar VS Narendra Kumar - Rajasthan).
- Legal Inapplicability of Rules: Certain procedural provisions, like Order 6 Rule 14 CPC, do not apply to applications under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2, leading to rejection (e.g., Aam Janta Somesar VS Vijay Raj M. Parmar - Rajasthan).
- Incorrect or Incomplete Grounds: If the application does not specify or substantiate valid grounds for stay or injunction, courts dismiss such applications (e.g., Abdul Gaffar VS Narendra Kumar - Rajasthan, CASH REGISTER CO (P) LTD VS SURAJ NARAYAN SHAW - Calcutta).
-
Misuse or Collusion: Applications are dismissed if filed in bad faith, collusion, or with fraudulent intent (e.g., AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK LTD VS PRIYA PURI - Delhi).
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The primary reason for dismissing applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 is the failure to establish a prima facie case, demonstrate irreparable injury, or meet the criteria for granting a temporary or permanent injunction.
- Courts emphasize the need for proper proof and adherence to procedural requirements; applications lacking these are dismissed to prevent misuse of interim relief provisions.
- Several cases highlight that procedural irregularities, failure to substantiate claims, or legal inapplicability of certain rules are valid grounds for dismissal.
References: - Abdul Gaffar VS Narendra Kumar - Rajasthan, Aam Janta Somesar VS Vijay Raj M. Parmar - Rajasthan, KITTAMMA VS B. SUBBA RAI - Karnataka, CASH REGISTER CO (P) LTD VS SURAJ NARAYAN SHAW - Calcutta, AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK LTD VS PRIYA PURI - Delhi, B. S. Keshava Murthy S/o Late B. S. Sriangachar VS B. K. Prasad - Karnataka, Marshall VS Grandhi Venkata Ratnam - Calcutta
Search Results for "What are the Grounds for Dismissal of Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code"
2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 528 • India - Calcutta
NARAYAN CHANDRA SIL
RULE 1 - REVIEW - GROUNDS - NEW PLEA OR GROUND - CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, SECTION 115 - REVISION - SCOPE AND GROUNDS - INTERIM ORDER ... JUDICATA - REVIEW APPLICATION - SCOPE AND GROUNDS - DISMISSAL OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION - EFFECT - CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, ORDER 47 ... Procedure Code (CPC) for stay of execution proceedings, one under Order 39 Rul....
2006 0 Supreme(Del) 952 • India - Delhi
A.K.SINHA
Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... Issues: 1. Whether the defendant obtained any file containing trade secrets or confidential information from Ms. ... /or on account of fear of the plaintiff bank of losing its those clients which were brought by defendant, due to her departure. 2. ... ... ( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of Plaintiff s application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the defendant....
1991 0 Supreme(Raj) 965 • India - Rajasthan
N.K.JAIN
Fact of the Case: The appellant's application under Order 0.39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. was rejected ... The appellant failed to demonstrate grounds for staying the proceedings or setting aside the impugned order, leading to the dismissal ... The appellant failed to demonstrate grounds for staying the proceedings or setting aside the impugned order, leading to the dism....
2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 2164 • India - Rajasthan
ARUN BHANSALI
39, Rule 1 & 2 CPC. ... The trial court rejected the application on the grounds that the provisions of Order 6, Rule 14 CPC do not apply to the reply to ... Issues: The issues revolved around the legality of the trial court's rejection of the application under Order 39, Rule 1 & ... The trial court, after hearing the parties by the impugned order#HL_....
1958 0 Supreme(Kar) 52 • India - Karnataka
A.NARAYANA PAL
injunction - jurisdiction - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure - Madras Buildings, Lease and Rent control Act ... could be considered an injury within the meaning of Order XXXIX, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ... - [Rule 2 of Order 39] - The court discussed the principles governing the grant of perpetual and temporary injunctions, the....
2024 0 Supreme(All) 2579 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Order 9 Rule 7 - Temporary injunction - Order dated 25.04.2023 granted temporarily ... in favor of petitioners, later set aside on grounds of incorrect facts by order dated 10.09.2024 without consideration of a written ... (Paras 10 and 11) ... ... (B) Revision - Dismissal of revision petition by Board of Revenue at ... It is well settled ....
2002 0 Supreme(P&H) 576 • India - Punjab and Haryana
M.M.KUMAR
for dismissal. ... Civil Procedure Code - Permanent Injunction - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 - Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 - [Order 39 ... The court also considered the previous order and withdrawal of a similar suit under Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code in reaching its decision ... Civil Judge (Senior Division) Rewari o....
2009 0 Supreme(Del) 1369 • India - Delhi
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 7 Rule 11 - Cancellation of sale deed - Plaintiff agreement purchaser ... in collusion with her husband, the defendant No. 1, has got transferred the title of the property to herself only - Principle that ... Practice prevalent in Delhi of properties being transacted by the mode of agreement to sell, power of attorney etc. - defendant No. 2 ... The Revision petition has been preferred by the defendants in the suit against the dismissal of their applic....
2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 544 • India - Karnataka
ARAVIND KUMAR
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227 – Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Order -39 Rule 1 and 2 - Claim ... in appeal filed by defendant first defendant though had not filed written statement has denied these two entries made in grounds ... orders passed by Courts below suffers from any material irregularity or illegality calling for interference by this Court - What order ... ORDER : In these writ petitions, order#HL_END....
1915 0 Supreme(Cal) 255 • India - Calcutta
JENKINS, WOODROFFE, MOOKERJEE
Contempt of Court - Breach of Injunction - [Order 41 Rule 1, Order 39 Rule 2, CPC] - The court held that the appellant could ... Final Decision: The court set aside the order of the learned judge and dismissed the motion with costs. ... Marshall knew nothing at all about the order of injunction, though the selling had been completed, he knew at 2-30 p.m. on Saturday that the order#HL_....
Filter by Legal Phrase
