AI Overview...
- Cannot be Done Directly - Certain actions are legally impermissible when attempted directly, such as filing proceedings for eviction or claiming rights, especially when specific categorization or legal criteria are not met SUSHILA DEVI VS KEDARNATH GUPTA - Madhya Pradesh, Narayanappa (D) By Lrs. VS B. S. Ramaswamy (D) By Lrs. - Supreme Court, Ramesh Kumar VS Sudha Gupta - Madhya Pradesh.
- Cannot be Done Indirectly - Actions that are prohibited directly are also barred from being achieved indirectly, such as attempting to bypass legal restrictions through subterfuge or indirect methods, including filing amendments post cut-off dates or claiming rights through sub-tenants or third parties SUKA HARI VS LILABAI ONKAR - Bombay, Ramesh Kumar VS Sudha Gupta - Madhya Pradesh, Leela Devi VS Ramchandra Prasad - Allahabad.
- Landlord and Tenant Specifics - Landlords cannot unilaterally deprive tenants of rights or claim relief indirectly that they cannot claim directly, such as withholding notices or benefits, or attempting to transfer leasehold rights unlawfully SUKA HARI VS LILABAI ONKAR - Bombay, Babulal Badriprasad Varma VS Surat Municipal Corporation - Supreme Court, Bal Kishan VS Vasu Deo - Rajasthan. Similarly, tenants cannot act against the wishes of landlords or transfer rights without consent, and acts against landlord's interests are not justified even if done indirectly Bal Kishan VS Vasu Deo - Rajasthan, Seethalakshmi Ammal VS Nabeesath Beevi - Kerala.
- Legal Principles - The overarching principle is that what cannot be legally done directly cannot be legally done indirectly, emphasizing the importance of adhering strictly to legal procedures and restrictions in landlord-tenant relations and proceedings SUSHILA DEVI VS KEDARNATH GUPTA - Madhya Pradesh, Ramesh Kumar VS Sudha Gupta - Madhya Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Legal doctrine firmly establishes that actions barred directly are equally prohibited indirectly. This principle ensures integrity in legal proceedings related to landlord-tenant disputes, eviction, and property rights. Attempts to circumvent restrictions through indirect means are invalid and may lead to legal invalidation or penalties.
Search Results for "What Cannot be Done Directly Cannot be Done Indirectly Landlord Landlord Tenant"
1986 0 Supreme(MP) 223 • India - Madhya Pradesh
RAM PAL SINGH
Thus, what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. ... -S. 23-A-landlords categorised-proceedings for eviction cannot be filed by landlord of one category for need of another. ... ... Where the landlords are categorised, one landlord cannot file the ... Winifred Ross, AIR 1984 SC 458, the Supreme Court has held that where the landlords are categorise....
2020 0 Supreme(All) 738 • India - Allahabad
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA
without success and thereafter, in execution proceedings the possession of the property in question was handed over to the landlord ... of the UP Act – Admitted facts, are that in regard to the property in dispute a release application was filed by the respondents-landlord ... under Section 144 CPC was allowed, which was challenged by the landlord without any success and in the meantime building was demolished ... Submission is that the court below has incorrectly observed that once the tenant has lost upto to the Hon'bl....
1996 0 Supreme(Raj) 490 • India - Rajasthan
B.R.ARORA, J.C.VERMA
the sub-tenant and original landlord? ... without consent – The Sub- tenant can not directly attorn his sub-tenancy in favour of the original land lord. ... , inducted either with the consent of original landlort or without the consent of the landlord, can straight way attorn his sub-tenancy ... The landlord cannot of his own deprive the teant of his right by joining hands with sub-tenant. Admittedly, if law does n....
2016 6 Supreme 184 • India - Supreme Court
MADAN B.LOKUR, R.K.AGRAWAL
which he could not do directly – Not permissible. ... decision – Attempt to file fresh application in the name of amendment after the cut-off date – Appellant trying to do something indirectly ... nbsp;Narayanappa’s claim was verified by the Tribunal and it was held that since he was not a tenant ... This was clearly impermissible and was an attempt to do so something in an indirect manner which could not have been done by him directly. ... 20. ... The Tribunal may for valid and sufficient reasons perm....
1974 0 Supreme(Bom) 88 • India - Bombay
C.S.DHARMADHIKARI
The tenant challenged the orders of the Special Deputy Collector and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, while the landlord sought ... Fact of the Case: The original landlord filed an application for possession of land under section 36 of the Bombay ... In these circumstances, in my opinion, the landholder cannot be allowed to secure the same relief indirectly which he could not have received or gained directly. ... It is an established principle of law that a party is not permitted to....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66782 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
has not complied with payment obligations or proper notice cannot gain any concessions against the landlord. ... Landlords contended that sub-tenants cannot claim the status of cultivating tenants as the original tenants violated lease agreements ... Court affirmed the view that cultivating tenants cannot transfer leasehold rights to third parties; as the rights were completely ... Till such time, the tenants did n....
2008 0 Supreme(SC) 759 • India - Supreme Court
S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
answer to said question must be rendered in negative - It is well-settled that what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly ... Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 - Section 65 - Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Rules, 1979 - Rule 33 – Tenant ... - Allotment of said land – Interpretation - Appellant was a tenant under said respondent in respect of Plot admeasuring sq.m - He ... It is well-settled that what can....
1980 0 Supreme(Bom) 100 • India - Bombay
B.LENTIN, S.K.DESAI
cut-off' and 'withhold' in section 24 of the Rent Act and held that 'cut-off' refers to a direct and positive act on the part of the landlord ... cut-off' and 'withhold' in section 24 of the Rent Act and held that 'cut-off' refers to a direct and positive act on the part of the landlord ... tenants and that the landlords had not established any just or sufficient cause for withholding the service. 2. ... No landlord can be heard to plead just or sufficient cause of what he himself has been responsible #....
2013 0 Supreme(MP) 208 • India - Madhya Pradesh
Sujoy Paul
This is settled in law that a thing which cannot be permitted to be done directly, cannot also be permitted to be done indirectly ... If the defence is struck off and written statement cannot be considered, the defence cannot also be permitted to put forth by way ... (6) and 12(1) -- Civil P.C., 1908 -- O.7 R.14(3) and O.8 R.1(3) r/w section 151 -- defence struck off by the Court -- defendant cannot ... This is settled in law that a....
2002 0 Supreme(Ker) 433 • India - Kerala
J.B.KOSHY, K.K.DENESAN
such acts of tenants are against wishes of landlord - But those acts cannot legitimately be described as acts intended to destroy ... Kerala Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 – Section 11(4)(ii) – Tenant – Eviction - It may be that ... to handover vacant possession of building - Therefore if tenants file an affidavit before Rent Control Court within two months from ... In other words utility of an object satisfying, directly or indirectly, the needs or desires....
Filter by Legal Phrase
