AI Overview...
-
Joint Family Property vs. Self-Acquired Property - The determination of whether a property, such as the Gugliawala house or properties gifted by Risal Singh, is joint family property or self-acquired depends on factors like acquisition method and the involvement of ancestral aid. Presumption of jointness arises when properties are acquired jointly by family members without clear evidence of individual acquisition. The burden of proof typically shifts to the person claiming self-acquired status to establish that the property is not part of the joint family estate Rajmal Mishrimal VS Kajmal Khemchand - Madhya Pradesh, Gurnam Singh VS Pritam Singh - Punjab and Haryana, Mangal Singh VS Harkesh - Allahabad.
-
Right of Pre-emption - The right of pre-emption generally belongs to co-sharers or joint family members with a pre-existing interest in the property. Under the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966, and Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, pre-emption rights are recognized for co-sharers and tenants, subject to specific provisions and exceptions. For example, sub-section (2) of Section 15 of the Punjab Act can bar pre-emption rights in certain cases, such as sales to outsiders or if the sale falls under specific statutory restrictions Prithi Pal Singh VS Milka Singh - Punjab and Haryana, Chandra Kalla (died) VS Shankar Lal - Rajasthan, [MOHAMMAD MAKIN
VS FAZLE RAB -
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500034989), Parveen Kumar VS Chetan Singh - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Effect of Sale and Legal Restrictions - The enforceability of pre-emption rights depends on the timing of the sale, the nature of the property (urban or rural), and compliance with statutory provisions. Rights can be barred or restricted by statutory provisions like Section 15(2) of the Punjab Act or through legal doctrines such as estoppel. The law recognizes that pre-emption is a reasonable restriction on property rights, but its applicability may be limited by constitutional provisions or specific legal conditions SANT RAM VS LABH SINGH - Allahabad, Karta Ram Mansa Ram VS Om Parkash Hirda Ram - Punjab and Haryana.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Pre-emption rights in the context of joint or self-acquired property hinge on whether the property is classified as joint family property, which is presumed unless proven otherwise. The burden of proof is on the person claiming self-acquired status. Pre-emption laws generally favor co-sharers and joint family members, but statutory restrictions and specific sale circumstances can limit or bar these rights. Therefore, the applicability of pre-emption in joint self-acquired property depends on the nature of the property, the circumstances of acquisition, and compliance with relevant legal provisions Rajmal Mishrimal VS Kajmal Khemchand - Madhya Pradesh, Gurnam Singh VS Pritam Singh - Punjab and Haryana, Mangal Singh VS Harkesh - Allahabad, Chandra Kalla (died) VS Shankar Lal - Rajasthan.
Search Results for "Whether Joint Self Acquired Property Pre Emption Applies"
• India - Madhya Pradesh
SHINDE, DIXIT
Whether the Gugliawala house was a part of the joint family property or Mishrimal's self-acquired property. 2. ... Whether the burden of proof shifted to Mishrimal to establish that the property was self-acquired. 3. ... PARTITION - Joint Family Property - Burden of Proof - Self-Acquired Property - Presumption - Shifting of Bu....
• India - Madhya Pradesh
DIXIT, CHATURVEDI, NEVASKAR
Whether the right of pre-emption under the Gwalior Pre-emption Act cannot be enforced in respect of any sale taking place after 26 ... Whether Sub-Ss. (1), (5) and (6) of S. 12, Gwalior Pre-emption Act, Samvat 1992, infringe the fundamental rights of the vendor and ... Whether S. 12 is valid for the enforcement of the right of pre-emption arising on sales which took place before 26-1-1950 and in .....
2010 0 Supreme(P&H) 1629 • India - Punjab and Haryana
VINOD K.SHARMA
Whether the property in dispute is joint Hindu family property qua the plaintiff? 2. ... The property jointly acquired by the members of a joint Hindu family without the aid of joint family property is presumed to be joint ... The presumption of jointness arises when the property is acquired by the members of a joint Hindu family by their joint....
1975 0 Supreme(P&H) 157 • India - Punjab and Haryana
R.S.NARULA, M.R.SHARMA, MAN MOHAN SINGH GUJRAL, P.C.JAIN, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
PRE-EMPTION - RIGHT OF - SUB-SECTION (2) OF SECTION 15 OF THE PUNJAB PRE-EMPTION ACT, 1913 - WHETHER BARS THE RIGHT OF PRE-EMPTION ... Whether sub-section (2) of Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 bars the right of pre-emption granted to tenants and co-sharers ... Fact of the Case: The question arose whether sub-section (2) of Section 15 of the Pun....
1961 0 Supreme(All) 114 • India - Allahabad
A.P.SRIVASTAVA, B.DAYAL
The right of pre-emption is a restriction on the right to acquire and hold property, but it is a reasonable restriction and is in ... Whether after coming into operation of the Constitution, the right of pre-emption is contrary to the provisions of Article 19 (1) ... Whether the entire law of pre-emption under the Mohammadan Law became void under article 13 of the Constitution, as It imposed an ... of this pronounc....
1957 0 Supreme(All) 184 • India - Allahabad
RAGHUBAR DAYAL, SRIVASTAVA
Whether the properties gifted by Risal Singh to Mangal Singh were joint family properties or Risal Singh's self-acquired properties ... JOINT FAMILY PROPERTY - ACQUISITION WITH AID OF ANCESTRAL PROPERTY - CHARACTER OF ACQUIRED PROPERTY - AID NEED NOT BE SUBSTANTIAL ... Whether the aid of ancestral property in acquiring the properties affected their character as joint family prope....
2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1848 • India - Rajasthan
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Ratio Decidendi: The right of pre-emption is available to a co-sharer in a property. ... Rajasthan Pre-emption Act, 1966 - The Act defines the right of pre-emption and specifies the cases in which the ... , and damages against the defendant, claiming joint ownership of the property. ... What has been said there to uphold the right of pre-emption granted to a cosharer as a reasonable restriction o....
1996 0 Supreme(All) 1128 • India - Allahabad
A.P.SINGH
Whether the custom of pre-emption existed in the township of Sakhrawal at the time of the transfer in question? 2. ... Whether the right of pre-emption in respect to urban house sites transgresses upon the fundamental rights of the defendant No. 2 ... The plaintiff claimed that being a co-sharer in the house in suit, he is entitled to pre-empt the property against the appellant. ... ... "the first two are pre-emption#HL_E....
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 1439 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RITU BAHRI
Pre-emption - Land Sale - Punjab Pre-emption Act - Section 15 (i) (b), Order 41 Rule 27, Section 151 CPC - 1975 Ex.D7 & Ex.D8 ... based on co-ownership Fact of the Case: The plaintiff filed a suit for pre-emption, claiming superior right to pre-empt ... sale deed - Amendment of written statement - Co-sharer's right to sell land to outsider - Estoppel against plaintiff - Right of pre-emption ... Whether the plainti....
1970 0 Supreme(P&H) 178 • India - Punjab and Haryana
R.S.NARULA, C.G.SURI, S.S.SANDHAWALIA, P.C.PANDIT, BAL RAJ TULI
Issues: Whether the sale fell under Section 15 (2) (a) of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, and whether Mula had a right of ... PRE-EMPTION - PUNJAB PRE-EMPTION ACT, 1913 - SECTION 15 (2) (A) - SALE BY FEMALE OF PROPERTY INHERITED THROUGH BROTHER - RIGHT ... sells property inherited through her brother, the right of pre-emption vests in the brother or brother's son of the vendor....
Filter by Legal Phrase
