AI Overview

AI Overview...

Complainant in 420 Cases

Analysis and Conclusion:
The complainant in 420 cases is generally the individual or entity alleging that the accused has committed cheating by inducing them to part with money or property through fraudulent means. They are central to initiating and supporting criminal proceedings, with their role and credibility being crucial for the prosecution's case. The courts focus on the intent to cheat and the evidence provided by the complainant to determine the validity of the charges.

References:
- Nalini Narayan VS C. Suryaprakash Rao - Andhra Pradesh, STATE OF KERALA VS VENKITA RAO - Kerala, VIJAY KHANNA VS STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) - Delhi, Parasmal Sakhla (Jain) VS Nemichand Meghraj Jain - Bombay, Sanjay Kumar Mishra VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, Sandip Somany VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Messrs. Biharilal Ramnarayan Mantri VS Anil Narottamdas Shah - Bombay, Maroti s/o. Hanmantrao Kamlapure VS State of Maharashtra, Through Incharge Police Station Officer - Bombay

Search Results for "Who is the Complainant in 420 Cases"

Nalini Narayan VS C.  Suryaprakash Rao

India - Andhra Pradesh

RADHAKRISHNA RAO

of the accused in inducing the complainant to part with money. ... The court held that the intention to cheat and induce the complainant to part with money should be investigated, and that if found ... Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to investigate the intention of the accused to cheat and induce the complainant ... Admittedly, the complainant has paid money in two instalments of Rs. 30,000/- each. When the registration has not yet been done they filed a suit against the company and A-1 for the recovery o....

WILSON vs STATE OF KERALA

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43668 India - High Court of Kerala

K.R. UDAYABHANU, J

Fraud - Cheating - IPC 420 - Sections: 420 IPC Fact of the Case: The complainant accused the defendants of deceiving ... by the complainant, which was not established in this case. ... him into purchasing an autorickshaw by falsely claiming ownership, leading to advance payments which the complainant later disputed ... of Rs.6000/- was also paid by the complainant. ... Further, the complainant could not establish that he paid Rs.6000/- on 15-2-93. ... The prosecution....

STATE OF KERALA VS VENKITA RAO

1969 0 Supreme(Ker) 219 India - Kerala

T.C.RAGHAVAN, P.UNNIKRISHNA KURUP

The court also analyzed the insanity defense and the burden of proof in such cases. ... S.410 provides for appeals against convictions by a Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge; S.417 provides for appeals against acquittal, both by the Public Prosecutor and by a private complainant; and S.420 makes provision for jail appeals in cases where the accused persons are convicted and ... State of Uttar Pradesh(AIR.1965 S.C. 257) and other cases. ... 7. Now we come to the question whether the present ....

Sandip Somany VS State of Haryana

2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 576 India - Punjab and Haryana

KULDIP SINGH

cannot wriggle out of the same—In such cases quashing can be directed in absence of consent of complainant before court. ... cannot wriggle out of the same--In such cases quashing can be directed in absence of consent of complainant before court. ... --Withdrawing from compromise--As per compromise--Complainant would withdraw civil and criminal cases after accepting of agreed amount ... However, payment of Rs.10 crore is not disputed by respondent No.2-complainant. .....

Parasmal Sakhla (Jain) VS Nemichand Meghraj Jain

2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 63 India - Bombay

S.S.SHINDE

or attracting any criminal provision and the applicants accused totally following instructions given by complainant from time to ... time and acted as per his directions, criminal cases against the accused under Ss.406 and 420 of IPC is rightly quashed by the High ... Penal Code (1860), Ss.406, 420 - Criminal P.C. (1973), S.482:- Where the allegations in the complaint are of a civil nature not disclosing ... The learned counsel submitted that there is no question of any criminal act, much less the provisions of section #....

Sanjay Kumar Mishra VS State of Jharkhand

2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1230 India - Jharkhand

D.N.UPADHYAY

Fact of the Case: The complainant authorized the petitioner to look after pending cases and sell property. ... resulting in a loss to the complainant. ... The petitioner persuaded the complainant to give him Power of Attorney and induced him to transfer the property at a lower price, ... Even assuming it to be true that the petitioner no. 1 had assured the complainant to pursue the cases on behalf of the complainant, if he failed to do so, no case under Section #HL_....

VIJAY KHANNA VS STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI)

2003 0 Supreme(Del) 496 India - Delhi

B.N.CHATURVEDI

cheated the complainant of Rs. 31 lakhs — 18 criminal cases pending against the accused — Perpetrator of such criminal acts in a ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 — Bail — Offence under sections 406/420/467/468/471/ 506/120-B, IPC — Alleged to have ... number of cases over a period of time beginning from 1994 — Liberty of an individual is precious, however the larger public interest ... To assure the complainant that there was no foul-play, the petitioner-accused provided the com....

Messrs.  Biharilal Ramnarayan Mantri VS Anil Narottamdas Shah

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1889 India - Bombay

SANDEEP K.SHINDE

It also fortifies the fact that cheque no.74326 was drawn and given by accused to complainant as a security. ... Evidence has probablised the defence of the accused that they had repaid the amount to the brother of the complainant between 24.10.1997 ... that as on date of presentation of subject cheques, there was no subsisting legally enforceable debt payable by the accused to the Complainant ... The Appellants (Complainant) and the Respondents-Accused in both the cases are the same. ... It may be stat....

K. Rajini VS Inspector of Police, Team-III, CCB, Chennai

India - Madras

R.REGUPATHI

406 and 420 of I.P.C ... S. ... Strikingly, from the materials available with regard to the pending cases, it is seen that, even according to the complainant Bankers/Financial Institutions, valid agreements have been entered into and their grievance is, the accused/borrowers failed to discharge the contractual obligations.

Maroti s/o.  Hanmantrao Kamlapure VS State of Maharashtra, Through Incharge Police Station Officer

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1226 India - Bombay

T.V.NALAWADE, VIBHA KANKANWADI

which is from books registered by first informant under Act - It is contended that due to such act of applicants sale of book of complainant ... copyright - Answer to subject question in which some shapes are used cannot give rise to copyright - For instance shapes used by complainant ... Copy Right Act, 1957 - sections 63, 65, 13, 45 and 51(a) - Copyright Rules 2013 - section 70(1)(2) - Indian Penal Code - section 420 ... The use of provision of section 420 of IPC is possible in such cases only when th....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top