AI Overview...
-
Wrong Report Filed by Lekhpal - An offense: Public servants, including Lekhpals, are mandated to report cognizable offences when incidents indicate such crimes. Filing incorrect or interpolated reports can constitute an offense, especially if it hampers criminal proceedings NARENDRA KUMAR VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad.
-
Collusion and Incorrect Legal Principles: Reports involving collusion between Lekhpals and accused persons, or reports based on incorrect facts, can lead to legal misjudgments. Courts have emphasized that reports should be accurate and made in accordance with legal principles; wrong reports or misreporting can impact judicial outcomes Mahesh Chand Sharma VS State of U. P. - Crimes, Mahesh Chand Sharma VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court.
-
Bribery and Corruption by Lekhpal: A Lekhpal demanding or accepting bribes constitutes a criminal offense under IPC Sections 161 and relevant anti-corruption laws. Filing false reports or misusing official position to facilitate corruption is an offense STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS RAVINDRA PAL SINGH LEKHPAL - Allahabad.
-
Inquest Reports and Their Limitations: Inquest reports, prepared at the mortuary, do not require details like assailants' names or crime numbers. They are for specific procedural purposes and not meant to serve as conclusive evidence. Filing incorrect or misleading inquest reports can be problematic but are often not fatal to cases if other evidence exists KALI CHARAN VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, 02500047465.
-
Legal Consequences of Wrong Reports: Filing a wrong or interpolated report by a Lekhpal can amount to an offense, especially if it obstructs justice or involves misconduct. Such acts are punishable under criminal law, and the legality of reports is scrutinized in courts to prevent misuse of official duties NARENDRA KUMAR VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, Sita Ram VS State - Allahabad.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Filing a wrong report by a Lekhpal, especially if interpolated or false, is considered an offense under criminal law. Public officials are required to report accurately; failure to do so, or filing misleading reports, can lead to criminal proceedings, including charges of misconduct or corruption. Courts have consistently emphasized the importance of truthful reporting by public servants to uphold justice and prevent misuse of authority NARENDRA KUMAR VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, Sita Ram VS State - Allahabad.
References:
- NARENDRA KUMAR VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad
- Mahesh Chand Sharma VS State of U. P. - Crimes
- Mahesh Chand Sharma VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court
- STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS RAVINDRA PAL SINGH LEKHPAL - Allahabad
- KALI CHARAN VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad
- Walmart India Pvt. Ltd. VS Central Vigilance Commission - Delhi
- Shibu Soren VS Lokpal of India - Delhi
- Sita Ram VS State - Allahabad
- Mahanth Kalyan Das VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
Search Results for "Wrong Report Filed by Lekpal is an Offense"
2016 0 Supreme(All) 973 • India - Allahabad
AJAI LAMBA, RAVINDRA NATH MISHRA II
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 154—Revenue record—Interpolation of—Criminal proceedings against—Quashing of—Petitioner a Survey Lekhpal—Prepared ... A person, particularly a public servant/public authority is required to report commission of cognizable offence in case an incident/transaction indicates commission of such an offence. ... 9. ... Applying the above noted principle of law to the facts of this case, we find that at the time of consideration of facts and circumstances of the matter being adjudicated, th....
• India - Crimes
V.S.SIRPURKAR, DEEPAK VERMA
Single Judge completely lost sight of fact that offence committed by accused in collusion with Area Lekhpal was not in relation to ... Present appeal has been filed against said order. ... Single Judge proceeded on absolutely wrong facts and incorrect principles of law had been applied. ... In the said report, Area Lekhpal reported that accused Panna Lal, Ram Babu and Rajkumar, sons of Parsadi are the only heirs of Jagan Prasad and Devi Prasad both sons of Bidha Ram. ... After investig....
2009 6 Supreme 518 • India - Supreme Court
V.S.SIRPURKAR, DEEPAK VERMA
Single Judge completely lost sight of fact that offence committed by accused in collusion with Area Lekhpal was not in relation to ... Present appeal has been filed against said order. ... Single Judge proceeded on absolutely wrong facts and incorrect principles of law had been applied. ... In the said report, Area Lekhpal reported that accused Panna Lal, Ram Babu and Rajkumar, sons of Parsadi are the only heirs of Jagan Prasad and Devi Prasad both sons of Bidha Ram. ... After investig....
1997 0 Supreme(All) 1220 • India - Allahabad
P.K.JAIN
The prosecution alleged that the respondent, a Lekhpal, demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs. 50 from two complainants in exchange ... Fact of the Case: The respondent was charged with offenses under Sections 161, IPC, and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption ... Act was submitted by Ravindra Pal Singh, although he stated that he does not remember if the report was given prior to the present incident. The respondent has filed Ex. Kha-1 certified copy of the report under Section 122b of the U. P. Z. A. ....
2015 0 Supreme(All) 628 • India - Allahabad
SHASHI KANT GUPTA, OM PRAKASH
—The names of assailants and manner of assault are not required to be mentioned in inquest report. [Para 18] ... Inquest report was prepared at the mortuary. Crime number etc. have not been shown in the inquest report. Similarly, in Form No.13 and other police papers prepared at the time of preparing the inquest report, crime number etc. have not been shown. ... The names of the assailants and the manner of assault are not required to be mentioned in the inquest report. The purpose of preparing the inq....
2018 0 Supreme(Del) 3084 • India - Delhi
VIBHU BAKHRU
Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 - Section 8 - Public officials - Misconduct - News-paper report - ... Inquiry by CVC, set aside - CVC had initiated an inquiry on the basis of a news report - An investigation into the allegations of ... and not suomoto or a complaint by any other person - Newspaper report cannot be construed as a complaint for the purposes of conducting ... Lastly, he submitted that even if a newspaper report was taken as a complaint, the report in the present case was bereft of a....
2024 0 Supreme(Del) 29 • India - Delhi
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Corruption - Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act - Section 20(1)(a), Section 20(3), Section 53 - The Lokpal and Lokayuktas ... The Lokpal directed a preliminary inquiry by the CBI to ascertain a prima facie case. ... The court emphasized the independence of the Lokpal and the need for it to make an independent decision on whether an investigation ... It is further stated in the writ petition that the report dated 01.07.2021 was not a final report. ... Had the Legislature intended so, then the co....
1967 0 Supreme(All) 32 • India - Allahabad
S.D.KHARE, YASHODANANDAN
CRIMINAL REVISION - LEKHPAL - SANCTION UNDER SECTION 197 CR.P.C. - NOT REQUIRED - OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 218 I.P.C. - INTENTION ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the Lekhpal was a public servant who had committed the offence while acting ... Whether the offence committed by the Lekhpal was committed while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty ... A mutation case was started on the basis of that application and the Kanungo, who was required to s....
2020 0 Supreme(All) 2 • India - Allahabad
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
basis of the report of the Tehsildar, Sadar, Faizabad mutation of name of Mahanth Damodar Das in khatauni as Sarvrakar was wholly ... Land Revenue Act and name of Damodar Das was deleted, report was sent by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, stating therein that on the ... It was further said that in view of the report of the Tehsildar and perusal of copies of the khataunis, order passed by Sub-Divisional ... (v) A given set of facts may make out : (a) purely a civil wrong; or (b) purely a criminal offence....
2009 0 Supreme(SC) 367 • India - Supreme Court
S.B.SINHA
also not fatal to prosecution case – Inquest report is prepared for the purpose of section 174 CrPC and not for corroborating the ... holistic view is taken – Non-examination of some witnesses also would not be fatal – Non-mentioning of names of accused in the inquest report ... /w section 320 and 321, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Offence ... The weapons used in the incident are not mentioned in inquest report. At the time of writing inquest report, I had come to known that Dhumsingh was eyewitnes....
Filter by Legal Phrase
