SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 479

1996(2) Supreme 614
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.I., Sujata V. Manohar and K, Venkatasmami JJ.
V. Subba Rao & Ors. -Petitioners
versus
The Secretary to Govt. Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Court of A.P. & Ors. -Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 9268-70/94
Decided on 27-2-1996

IMPORTANT POINT
The contention of the petitioners that they are entitled to benefit of Rule 4(2) of A.P. Ministerial Service Rules, 1966 for their promotion to post of Junior Assistants or in the alternative, to the benefit of general ad hoc rule promulgated in GOMs No. 627 dt. 21st Dec. 1983, cannot be accepted. They are governed by Rule 3(17) as amended by G.O.Ms. No. 589 dt. 19th November 1986 requiring a minimum of 5 years service in the last grade for promotion to post of Junior Assistants.

Headnote:Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1966-Rule 3(17)-Rule of Promotion from Watchman, Attenders etc. to Junior Assistants- GOMs No. 627 dated 21-12-1983 requiring minimum qualifying service ordinarily 3 years and in no case less than 2 years-GOMs No. 589 dt. 19.11.86 requiring minimum of 5 years service-Petitioners promoted as Junior Assistants though worked hardly 3 years in the last grade post-Order of reversion passed-Confirmed by A.P. Adm. Tribunal-SLP to S.C.-Whether petitioners need to have five years service as Watch-man, Attenders etc. for appointment as Junior Assistants ? (Yes)-Of the two Ad hoc Rules in GOMs, the later will prevail over earlier (Para 8)-Rule 4(2) does not apply to recruitment of Petitioners (Para 9)-SLP dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-The petitioners were originally employees of Zilla Praja Parishads of various Districts in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioners are the children of decreased employees of the respondents. In or around December 1983 they were appointed by the respondents on compassionate grounds as Watchmen etc. under the quota for deceased employees children on a consolidated pay. In December 1988 they were appointed as regular employees in the Zilla Praja Parishad on a regular scale of pay. In 1991-1992, they were promoted to the post of Junior Assistants.

2. In April 1993, a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioners to show-cause why they should not be reverted to their Last Grade Post since five years service in the Last Grade Post is required for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant. The petitioners has worked for hardly three years in the Last Grade post. The petitioners submitted their explanation relying upon G.O.Ms. No. 627 of 21st of December, 1983. They contended that for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant the minimum qualifying service was ordinarily three years and in no case less than two years.

3. In view, however, of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1966 as amended by G.O.Ms.No. 589, dated 19th of November 1986, which requires a minimum of five years service in the Last Grade for promotion to the post of the Junior Assistant, the contentions raised by the petitioners were rejected by the respondents by an order dated 29.5.1993 issued by respondent No. 2. The petitioners were reverted to their original post. Being aggrieved by this order the petitioners filed applications before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal challenging their order of reversion. These applications have been dismissed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. The present petitions challenge the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal.

4. The question is whether the petitioners need to have five years service as Watchmen, Attenders, etc. for appointment as Junior Assistants. The petitioner have placed reliance on G.O.Ms. No. 627 dated 21st of December, 1983. This Government Order is issued by the General Administration Department in connection with certain Special/Ad hoc Rules relating to various State and Sub-ordinate Services. It states that the Speical/Ad hoc Rules relating to State and Subordinate Services a provision is made to the effect that a member of the service should ordinarily put in a period of five years of service in the lower category from which promotion is to be made to the next higher category in the same service or when an appointment is to be made by transfer from any other service (underlining ours). The Government with a view to avoiding administrative difficulties had issued an Ad hoc Rule set out in G.O.Ms. No. 85 dated 12.2.1979 reducing "ordinarily five years in the lower category" to three years of which at least two years service was required to be in the category, class or grade from which promotion was to be made. As the wording of the Rule was considered defective, it was decided to make a fresh Ad hoc Rule in its place. Accordingly a Notification (G.O.Ms.No. 627) was issued on 21.2.1983 framing an Ad hoc Rule superseding the earlier Ad hoc Rule issued in G.O.Ms.No. 85 dated 12th of February, 1979. The new Ad hoc Rule was deemed to have come into force on 12th of February, 1979. It is to the following effect :-

"Notwithstanding anything contained in the relevant Special Rules or the Ad hoc rules for the State and Subordinate Service, the minimum period of "Ordinarily five years of service" wherever prescribed in the said Rules for appointment of a member of service form the lower category, class or grade, to the next higher category, class or grade whether such appointment is made either by promotion in the regular line or by recruitment by transfer from any other service, that period shall be reduced to "

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top