SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1116

A. M. AHMADI, A. S. ANAND, S. B. MAJMUDAR
J. H. Patel: Subhan Khan – Appellant
Versus
Subhan Khan: J. H. Patel – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.M. Ahmadi, CJI - By an order dated March 20, 1996, Civil Appeal No. 1795/96 was allowed and the impugned order of the High Court dated Janaury 3, 1996, was set aside. The Civil Appeal No. 3677/96 which was actually cross objections filed by the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1795/96 was dismissed. The election petition from which the present appeals arose was consequently dismissed. The present judgment is to provide reasons for the above order.

2. First, the facts in brief. Shri Subhan, Khan, the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 1795/96, (hereinafter referred to as the respondent), filed the election petition challenging the election of Shri J.H. Patel, the appellant in C.A. No. 1795/96, from 158 Channagiri Legislative Assembly Constituency on the ground that his (respondent s) nomination paper was improperly rejected by the Returning Officer. One Sri E. Shekharappa, a voter from the same constituency, filed a nomination paper proposing the respondent s name on October 29, 1994. The Returning Officer issued a notice to the respondent to make and subscribe the oath or affirmation before the dated appointed for scrutiny of the nomination paper, that is, November 3, 1994. The


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top