JUDGMENT

Faizan Uddin, J.-The appellant who is an advocate has preferred this appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act against the order dated March 28, 1992 passed by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India in BCI/TR Case No. 100 of 1990 suspending the appellant on the roll of the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa for a period of two years with a further direction to pay a sum of Rs. 1500/- as costs to the complainant-respondent No. 1 herein in exercise of its powers under Section 38(3)(c) read with Section 38 as well as Section 43(B) of the Advocates Act, 1981. The said appellant has also filed the Special Leave Petition referred to above against the order dated October 18, 1992 dismissing the review petition filed by the appellant against the said order dated March 28, 1992.

2. This appeal was heard and disposed of by us on March 21, 1996 by passing the following order :

"We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the respondent-original complainant at some length. For reasons which we will state hereafter, we allow the appeal and set aside the order of the Bar Council of India holding the appellant guilty of misconduct. In view of our decisi