1996(8) Supreme 141
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(Record of Proceedings)
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.I., S.P. Bharucha and B.N. Kirpal, JJ.
Amitabh Bachchan Corpn. Ltd. -Petitioner
versus
Mahila Jagran Manch & Ors. -Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 22902/96
(From the Judgment and Order dated 19-11-1996 in WA 9173/96 of High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore)
With
(Appln(s) for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing O.T.)
Order dated 22-11-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : H.N. Salve, Sr. Advocate, C.K. Sasi, Sanjeev Ahuja, Kailash Vasdev, Nikhil & Ms. Meenakshi Sakhardande, Vanita Sahai, Advocates.
ORDER
We have carefully perused the pleadings in the High Court and the judgments rendered by the learned Single Judge as well as the Division Bench. We have also taken note of the directions given by the Division Bench. The petitioners appreciating the anxiety of the Division Bench on the question of serving of liquor and payment of expenses to be incurred by the State for maintenance of law and order have filed an affidavit sworn by the General Manager (Legal) of the petitioner-Company wherein it is stated as under :
(a) Liquor will be served only as a welcome toast at the beginning of the pageant and as a toast at the end of the contest. This service will be in selected enclosures and will be served only to the invitees, organisers and dignitaries seated in those enclosures. No liquor shall be served to the audience generally or to the participants.
(b) The petitioner would pay the requisite charges to the State for providing security for the pageant in accordance with the applicable rules.
2. This, in our view, satisfies the main anxiety of the Division Bench. The rest of the directions, we are prima-facie satisfied, are not sustainable.
3. In view of what has been stated in the affidavit we grant ad-interim stay of the operation of the directions issued by the Division Bench of the High Court. All actions taken in pursuance of these directives shall also be stayed.
Notice to respondents returnable within six weeks.
4. A copy of this order may be given to counsel for the petitioners today and may be sent by fax to the Chief Secretary to the Government of Karnataka and to the Registrar General of the High Court of Karnataka.
Ordered accordingly. Notice to Mahila Jagran Manch returnable within six weeks.
********
Parallel Citations of other Journals :
Amitabh Bachchan Corpn. Ltd. v. Mahila Jagran Manch, 1996(8) Supreme 141
00030
00031
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.