SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 76

A. M. AHMADI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR, G. B. PATTANAIK
Amitabh Bachchan Corporation LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Mahila Jagran Manch – Respondent


ORDER

We have carefully perused the pleadings in the High Court and the judgments rendered by the learned Single Judge as well as the Division Bench. We have also taken note of the directions given by the Division Bench. The petitioners appreciating the anxiety of the Division Bench on the question of serving of liquor and payment of expenses to be incurred by the State for maintenance of law and order have filed an affidavit sworn by the General Manager (Legal) of the petitioner-Company wherein it is stated as under :

(a) Liquor will be served only as a welcome toast at the beginning of the pageant and as a toast at the end of the contest. This service will be in selected enclosures and will be                served only to the invitees, organisers and dignitaries seated in those enclosures. No liquor shall be served to the audience generally or to the participants.

(b) The petitioner would pay the requisite charges to the State for providing security for the pageant in accordance with the applicable rules.

2. This, in our view, satisfies the main anxiety of the Division Bench. The rest of the directions, we are prima-faci









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top