JUDGMENT

Sen, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been filed against an order passed by the Rajasthan High Court on a writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing some adverse remarks made in his Annual Confidential Report for the year 1990. The controversies raised by the appellant in this case are really questions of fact. The appellant Bharat Ram Meena was appointed as Munsiff/Judicial Magistrate on probation for two years on 19.7.1985. The appellant was duly confirmed and later on posted as Munsiff/Judicial Magistrate, Barmer, District Balotra. In the years 1987, 1988 and 1989 the appellant discharged the duties as Munsiff/Judicial Magistrate, Barmer satisfactorily. In has been stated by the appellant that Shri Satya Prakash Pathak, the then District and Sessions Judge, Balotra had found the appellant s work satisfactory and the Annual Confidential Reports had been written accordingly.

3. General Elections to the Legislative Assembly of State of Rajasthan were held on 27.2.1990. The appellant was deputed as Zonal Magistrate for the purpose of election to the State Assembly. On 20.2.1990, a wireless message had been issued by the Registrar, Rajasthan High Court to the Electio