SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1554

1997(10) Supreme 274
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab & Haryana High Court)
J.S. Verma, CJI., B.N. Kirpal, M. Srinivasan, JJ.
Rajiv Mittal -Appellant
versus
Maharshi Dayanand University & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6613 of 1997
Decided on 28-11-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant, Manoj Swarup, Advocate.
For the Respondents, K.K. Mohan, Advocate.

Headnote:EDUCATION-Admission to first year M.B.B.S.-Session 1996-97-Rohtak Medical College-System of counselling for granting admission to various medical colleges in State of Haryana-Options are given of various seats to students in accordance with their overall merit position in combined entrance examination-Unless and until counselling takes place, no candidate who has been granted admission on basis of counselling is allowed to change his college merely because a seat in another college has fallen vacant-S having failed to secure admission to a seat in open category in first counselling-Secured admission to reserved seat in same counselling-Question of his being shifted or being regarded as a candidate to open category seat which had become available only after he had secured admission did not arise-appellant rightly granted admission to general category seat in the Rohtak Medical College.

       Held : The system of counselling for the purpose of granting admission to the various medical colleges in the State is now regarded as most equitable one where options are given of various seats to the students in accordance with their overall merit position in the combined entrance examination, which examination is competitive in nature. (Para 10)

       If as a result of first counselling, all the seats, which are available, are filled then no further counselling takes place. Where however some seats become available, then it appears that second, third or if the need arise, fourth counselling does take place but in such a manner that normally there should be no delay in the commencement of the course of study. Further more unless and until counselling takes place, no candidate who has been granted admission on the basis of the counselling, is allowed to change his college merely because a seat in another college has fallen vacant. The seats, if any, which fall vacant, can only be filled if and when counselling takes place where the candidates who have already been selected may have an option of shifting to another college. (Para 11)

       As Sunil Yadav s position in the open category was at serial number 62 and the last candidate who had secured admission at the first counselling against the 49th seat was at serial No. 53, therefore, having failed to secure admission on 9.9.1996, Sunil Yadav was rightly allowed to take part on the second day of the first counselling for the backward class candidates which was held on 10.9.1996. It is in that counselling that he was selected and granted admission to the Medical College at Rohtak. Once Sunil Yadav had secured admission in the reserved category quota at the first counselling, there would be no occasion for him to take part in the second counselling for the general category seat for the same college which was held on 26.9.1996. The seat which had fallen vacant was one of the 49 seats which was required to be filled by the general category candidates. As the aforesaid Note 2 was not applicable to a case like the present, where Sunil Yadav having failed to secure admission to a seat in the open category in the first counselling for that category but had secured admission to the reserved seat in the same counselling, the question of his being shifted or being regarded as a candidate to the open category seat which had become available only after he had secured admission did not and could not arise and, consequently, the appellant was rightly granted admission to the general category seat in the Rohtak Medical College. (Para 13)

       

JUDGMENT

Kirpal, J.-The question which arises for consideration in this appeal relates to the admission to first year M.B.B.S. course for the session 1996-97 to the Rohtak Medical College, respondent No. 2.

2. Seats in different medical colleges in the State of Haryana are filled on the basis of M.B.B.S. entrance examination. Rohtak Medical College, respondent No. 2 is affiliated to Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak and for the session 1996-97, it had 60 M.B.B.S. free seats to which admission had to be made in the first year of the said course. Out of this, 49 seats were to be filled from the open category candidates while remaining 11 seats were reserved for backward class candidates.

3. In the entrance examination, one Sunil Yadav, on the basis of his marks had secured position at serial No. 1 in the category of backward class quota while in the general category, he had been placed at merit position No. 62. The seats to the medical colleges are filled on the basis of counselling where candidates are given option to select the college where they want to study. This option is given to the candidates, whose names are arranged in the order of merit.

4. On 9.9.1996, the first counselling for the 49 seats in the open/general category was held. Sunil Yadav did not secure any seat in the general category because of his low merit position. On the following day i.e. 10.9.1996, Sunil Yadav appeared for the first counselling for the reserved seats as he had been placed at serial No. 1 in the category of backward class. He naturally got selected and secured admission to the M.B.B.S. course at the Rohtak Medical Colleges in the reserved category.

5. If after the first counselling, certain seats remain unfilled, then second, third or fourth counselling, as the need arise, takes place. Inasmuch as few seats in the general category had fallen vacant, second counselling was held on 26.9.1996. Students upto serial No. 60 in the aforesaid merit list were granted admission and there still remained one seat in the general category which remained to be filled. The candidate at merit list No. 61 did not join the counselling, Sunil Yadav, who was at merit list No. 62 having already secured admission, also did not appear for the counselling for the general category. Similarly, candidates at serial Nos. 63, 64 and 65 also did not join for counselling. This seat was thereupon offered to the appellant herein who was at serial No. 66. He accepted the offer of admission and joined the Rohtak Medical College.

6. Respondent No. 3 who belonged to the reserved category could not get admission in the Rohtak Medical College inasmuch as his merit position in the reserved category was at serial No. 12 while the number of seats in this category in that college were only 11 and all those seats had been filled. He thereupon filed a writ petition in the Punjab and Haryana High Court contending that Sunil Yadav should have been adjusted against the general category seat, which had been allotted to the appellant herein in the second counselling held on 26.9.1996, and if this is done, one seat in the reserved category would fall vacant which would naturally fall to respondent No. 3.

7. On behalf of the respondent No. 1, the stand taken was that Sunil Yadav could not be considered in the first counselling in the open category because he did not fall among those open category candidates who had been given admission against 49 open category seats. Candidates upto merit position 53 had been offered admission against these seats at the time of first counselling. Thereupon, Sunil Yadav was called for first counselling for reserved seats and was granted admission against the backward category quota. He, having thus secured the seat, lost his claim for open category and, therefore, did not attend the second counselling which was held on 26.9.1996.

8. The High Court, allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No. 3 as it held that it was "settled principle of law that a candidate















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top