V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Vengdasalam Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Of Pondicherry – Respondent
Judgment
BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J. :- With the obvious intent of falling in line with the rest of the country in the matter of achieving the social goal of equitable distribution of cultivable lands by the imposition of ceiling on agricultural land holdings and distribution of surplus lands among landless persons, the Legislature of the Union Territory of Pondicherry enacted The Pondicherry Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1973 (hereinafter called the Act). The, questions arising for determination in this appeal concern the interpretation of some of the provisions of the Act.
2. Before we proceed to refer to the relevant sections of the Act, we shall set out in brief the material facts, which have given rise to the controversy before us.
3. The appellant Vengdasalam Pillai is married to Smt. Senbagevalli Ammal. Five children-three daughters and two sons-were born to this couple. On March 17, 1970, the appellant effected a partition of all his properties as between himself and his two sons both of whom were minors at that time. This partition was evidenced by a registered document. Under that document the appellant retained in his name an extent of 1-85-63 hectares of land.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.