SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 740

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
Triveni Shankar Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.:- This appeal is filed by the appellant Triveni Shankar Saxena questioning the correctness of the judgment dated 23-8-1982 rendered by the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Writ Petn. No. 226 of 1980 allowing the said Writ Petition and quashing the order of the Uttar Pradesh Services Tribunal dated 6-10-1979. A few facts of the case as set out in Suit No. 367/ 74 filed before the Court of the Civil Judge, Moradabad may be stated:

The appellant was appointed as a Lekhpal by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Moradabad on 6-4-1953 at the circle of Village Tilokpur, Pargana in Moradabad District, which post he held from 6-4-53 to 12-3-54 at Tilokpur and thereafter from 13-3-54 to 15-11-54 in Village Thonda in Tehsil Moradabad.

2. In the wake of consolidation proceedings in the State of U.P., the appellant Was selected as a Consolidator on 5-11-1954, and was sent for training as a Consolidator at Rampur Training College, which hejoined on 16-11-1954 and after completing the training he again joined his original posting on 12-2-55.

3. On 24-3-55 the appellant was appointed as a Consolidator in Sah;iranpur by the Commission of Consolidation, U. Pt Governm






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top