SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1446

V. N. KHARE, A. S. ANAND, J. JAGANNADHA RAO
G. Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Special Tahsildar, T. N. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Leave granted.

2. This batch of 89 civil appeals have a chequered history. We are, however, relieved of the necessity to trace out the history because of the view that we propose to take and which view has already been indicated to learned counsel for the parties.

3. For the expansion of the existing mines and dumping yard for Neyveli Lignite Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation ), lands were acquired in various villages in South Arcot District. Notifications under Section 4(i) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 were published between 1975 to 1978. The Land Acquisition Officers made Awards on different dates. A large number of References were filed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act by the land holders subsequently. The learned Sub-Judge allowed the References by enhancing the rate of compensation for (1) Wetlands; (2) Irrigated Dry Lands; (3) Drylands; (4) House Sites; and (5) Cashew Thope. Against the enhancement of compensation, the Government filed appeals in which conditional stay was granted by way of an interim order by the High Court. Against the said order, the Corporation filed 63 Special Leave Petitions in this Court during 1986-1988. T



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top