SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1523

V. N. KHARE, J. JAGANNADHA RAO, A. S. ANAND
S. K. Pattanaik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the Full Bench of the High Court of Orissa dated 2nd of December, 1994.

2. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follow.

The appellant imported into the State of Orissa Indian made foreign liquor and stored it in a licensed bonded warehouse from where the liqour was to be released for sale. While liquor was so stored in the warehouse, a portion of the imported stock became sedimented and was rendered unfit for human consumption. That stock was, therefore, destroyed. A notice was issued to the appellant for payment of countervailing duty on the stock to the tune of Rs. 10,02,183/-. The validity of the demand of countervailing duty was challenged by the appellant in a writ petition which was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court. It was asserted that since the stock of liquor had been "destroyed" in the warehouse countervailing duty could not be imposed. Before the Division Bench, reliance was placed on the judgment in the case of P.D. Jain v. State of Orissa1, which had been followed in the case of Mohan Meakins Ltd. v. State of Orissa2. The Division Bench felt that the two decisions n










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top