SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 654

Baburao – Appellant
Versus
Manikrao – Respondent


Judgment

K. Venkataswami, J.-Aggrieved by the dismissal of Election Petition No. 4/95 on the file of Bombay High Court (Auranga-bad Bench), this appeal is filed by the appellant.

2. In January, 1995 the elections to the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly were held. The appellant and the first respondent alongwith others had filed nominations to contest from 211 Nilanga Assembly Constitutency, Latur District. The appellant raised objections before the Returning Officer (Respondent No. 2) to the candidature of first respondent. According to the appellant, as the first respondent’s name was appearing in the electoral rolls of 211 Nilanga Assembly Constitu­ency and also 206 Latur Assembly Constituency, he could not be an elector in both the constituencies and, therefore, his nomination has to be rejected. After hearing the parties, the Returning Officer overruled the objections of the appellant by an order dated 19.1.1995. A revision filed before the Chief Electoral Officer, Maharashtra State, was also not successful. The Returning Officer announced the result of the 211 Nilanga Constituency on 12.3.1995 by declaring that the first respondent was elected from that constituency.

3. The












































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top