Baburao – Appellant
Versus
Manikrao – Respondent
Judgment
K. Venkataswami, J.-Aggrieved by the dismissal of Election Petition No. 4/95 on the file of Bombay High Court (Auranga-bad Bench), this appeal is filed by the appellant.
2. In January, 1995 the elections to the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly were held. The appellant and the first respondent alongwith others had filed nominations to contest from 211 Nilanga Assembly Constitutency, Latur District. The appellant raised objections before the Returning Officer (Respondent No. 2) to the candidature of first respondent. According to the appellant, as the first respondent’s name was appearing in the electoral rolls of 211 Nilanga Assembly Constituency and also 206 Latur Assembly Constituency, he could not be an elector in both the constituencies and, therefore, his nomination has to be rejected. After hearing the parties, the Returning Officer overruled the objections of the appellant by an order dated 19.1.1995. A revision filed before the Chief Electoral Officer, Maharashtra State, was also not successful. The Returning Officer announced the result of the 211 Nilanga Constituency on 12.3.1995 by declaring that the first respondent was elected from that constituency.
3. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.