SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1019

S. RAJENDRA BABU, A. S. ANAND, R. C. LAHOTI
Somnath Rath – Appellant
Versus
Bikram K. Arukh – Respondent


Judgment

Aggrieved by the dismissal of his election petition, challenging the election of the returned candidate-respondent No. 1, vide order of the High Court dated 23rd of December, 1999, the appellant has filed this appeal.

2. For the purpose of this appeal however only a few facts are rele­vant and necessary to be noticed.

The last date for filing nominations in respect of the Assembly Con­stituencies in the State of Orissa for the elections held in the year 1995 was 17th of January, 1995. Thirteen persons including the appel­lant and the respondents filed their nomination papers for 66, Bhanj­nagar Assembly Constituency. At the time of scrutiny of the nomination papers on 19th January, 1995, the Returning Officer rejected the nomination papers of respondent Nos. 5,6 and 7. While the nomination papers of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 were rejected by the Returning Officer on the ground that the same were found to be defective, the nomination papers of respondent No. 7-Panchanan Das was rejected on the ground that “Candidate is a PDS dealer of Bhanjanagar Ward No. 13. Hence rejected.”

After polling, results of the elections were declared and respondent No. 1 was declared successful and el












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top