SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 739

A. S. ANAND, BRIJESH KUMAR, R. C. LAHOTI
Nawal Kishore Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Order

Leave granted.

2. Appellant had joined Bihar Administrative Services (Judicial Branch) as a Munsif in 1963. He came to be promoted as an Additional Sub-Judge in 1975 and was promoted as an Additional District and Sessions Judge in 1983. Taking note of his service record, he was confirmed in Bihar Superior Judicial Services with effect from 1.2.1987. The appellant was promoted as District and Sessions Judge in 1991 and was sent on deputation as Secretary, Bihar Legislative Council with effect from 9th December, 1994. On attaining the age of 58 years, the appellant was retired from service without being given the benefit of an extension of two years. According to the High Court the service record of the appellant had been seen and it was decided not to give him benefit of two years extension i.e. from the age of 58 years to the age of 60. The appellant questioned the refusal to grant him benefit of two years extension. The writ petition was resisted by the High Court. A Division Bench of the High Court took note of the fact that case of the appellant had been considered by a Review Committee constituted for reviewing cases for grant of extension which had not favoured grant of ex










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top