K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Antonysami – Appellant
Versus
Arulanandam Pillai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.P. Mohapatra, J.-Is the execution petition filed by the appellant barred by limitation is the question that arises for determination in this appeal. The High Court having answered the question in the affirmative the decree-holder has filed this appeal assailing the order of the High Court.
2. The factual backdrop of the case relevant for appreciating the points raised may be shortly stated thus:
The predecessor in interest of the decree-holder filed the suit against the judgment-debtor, O.S.No.35/1965, for specific performance of the contract of sale dated 7.2.1964. The suit property was described as 13 grounds and 491 sq.ft. on measurement and demarcation. The suit was decreed on 23rd July, 1966. The said decree reads as follows:-
"(1) The defendant do measure and demarcate the boundaries for 13 grounds and 491 sq. ft. in the property described hereunder on or before 23.9.1966
(2) That the plaintiff do deposit into court on or before 23.9.1966 the balance of the sale price for 13 grounds and 491 sq. ft. on measurement and demarcation.
(3) That on such measurement and demarcation and fixation of the price and on deposit the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.