SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Cal) 142

N.C.MUKHERJI, A.K.SINHA
RAM KRISHNA TARAFDAR – Appellant
Versus
NEMAI KRISHNA TARAFDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bagchi, GANGULI, SAKTI NATH MUKHERJI, SAMIR KUMAR MUKHERJI

A. K. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE three appeals are taken up together for the sake of convenience as they arise out of several execution proceedings started by some of the co-sharers for enforcement of the final decree based on an Award given by the Arbitrators effecting partition of joint family properties.

( 2 ) THE common case of all the parties briefly is that in or about 1945 a suit was filed by one Sunil Krishna Tarafdar one of the co-sharers against other co-sharers for partition of joint family properties including several businesses which was eventually referred to arbitration. On or about 16th April, 1951, the Arbitrators filed their Award effecting partition of all the properties including several businesses amongst five groups of co-sharers. On or about 22nd December, 1952, a final decree was passed in terms of the Award but it was actually drawn up, signed and sealed after about lapse of 16 years i. e. on or about 31-5-68. The material portion of relevant Award for the purpose of present cases thus confirmed by the final decree provided, inter alia, as follows:i. The plaintiff Sunil Krishna Tarafdar would pay owelty money in respect of his allotment of a portion of the pre

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top