K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, P.VENKATARAMA REDDI
Pratibha Nema – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
Judgment
P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.—Facts and Contentions:-
The acquisition of 73.3 hectares of dry land situate in Rangwasa village of Indore District and Tehsil belonging to the appellants and others is the subject-matter of challenge in these appeals filed by the landholders. The said extent of land was notified for acquisition under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as Act ) for the alleged public purpose of establishment of diamond park . This parcel of land together with an extent of 44.8 hectares of Government land was meant to be placed at the disposal of the Industries Department and/or Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Nigam ) for the purpose of allotting the same to various industrial units-the foremost among them being the 9th respondent-Company, for setting up diamond cuffing and polishing units with modern technology. The proposal in this regard emanated from the General Manager of District Industries Centre, on the initiative taken by the 9th Respondent. After the land was located by a joint inspection committee of officials, the Government of Madhya Pradesh (Commerce & Industries Depart
Stele of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh
R.L Arora v. State of Uttar Pradesh
R.L. Arora v. State of Utter Pradssh
Hamabai Framjee Petit v. Secretary of State for India
Manubhal Jehtalal Patel vs. State of Gujarat [(1983) 4 SCC 553. (Para 9)
Indrajit C. Parekh v. State of Gujarat
Bajirao T. Kote v. State of Maharashtra
Srinivasa Co-operative House Building Society Limited v. Madam G. Sastry
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.