S. B. SINHA, S. H. KAPADIA
Ramesh Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Sanwal Chand Singhvi – Respondent
Judgment
Kapadia, J.-The question raised in these civil appeals is - whether in counting “the whole number of members of the municipal board” in terms of rule 3(9) of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Motion of Non-Confidence against Chairman/Vice-Chairman) Rules 1974, nominated members have to be taken into consideration?
2. For sake of convenience, we refer to the facts in Civil Appeal No. 6133 of 2002.
3. On 19.8.2000, elections were held for the Municipal Board, Sanchar, district Jalore. The appellant Ramesh Mehta was elected as Chairperson of the Municipal Board. On 24.10.2000, the State Government nominated two members on the Board. On 6.10.2001, the total number of members of the municipal board consisted of 20 elected members, 2 nominated members and one MLA (Ex-officio). Thus, the total number of members of 6.10.2001 were 23. On that day, the no confidence motion was moved against the Chairperson, in which 15 members voted for the motion. The motion was conducted by the SDO, Sanchar as a nominee of the Collector, Jalore. According to the SDO, the no confidence motion stood carried out as the whole number of members on the board, excluding the nominated members, was 21
Hansraj Gupta v. Dehra Dun Mussorrie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd.
State of Karnataka v. Union of India & Anr.
The Workmen of M/s. Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India P. Ltd. & Ors. v. The Management & Ors.
Smt. Hira Devi & Ors. v. District Board, Shahjahanpur
Knowles v. Zoological Society of London
R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex. p. Venables
Deepal Girishbhai Soni & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.