SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 766

S.N.VARIAVA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Maulavi Hussein Haji Abraham Umarji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-The scope and ambit of Section 49(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (in short the POTA ) fall for consideration in this appeal. Since the legal issue involved in this appeal relates to the question as to during what period prayer for police custody can be made, brief reference to the factual aspects is sufficient.

2. On 27.2.2002 some persons died at Godhra in the State of Gujarat and several persons were injured when allegedly a train was attacked and set ablaze. The first information report was lodged and various persons were arrested in connection with the alleged occurrence.

3. Initially, the case was registered for alleged commission of offences punishable under various provisions of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC ), Indian Railways Act, 1989 (in short the Railways Act ) and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (in short the Public Property Act ) read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (in short the Bombay Act ). Subsequently, an application was filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway seeking addition of offences punishable under Section 3(1)(a), (b) and 3(2) of the POTA. T













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top