SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(SC) 81

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
5th December 1952.
PATANJALI SASTRI, C.J.I., B.K. MUKHERJEA, CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR, BOSE AND GHULAM HASAN, JJ.
Darshan Singh Balwant Singh and another, Appellants
Versus
The State of Punjab, Respondent; The Union of India, Intervener.
Appeals Nos. 11 and 12 of 1950.
Advocates appeared
Shri Achhru Ram, Senior Advocate (Shri Gopal Singh, Advocate, with him), instructed by Shri Naunit Lal, Agent, (in No. 11) and Shri S. M. Sikri, Advocate-General of Punjab (Shri H. S. Gujral, Advocate with him) instructed by Shri G. H. Rajadhyaksha, Agent, (in No. 12) for Appellants; Shri M. C. Setalvad, Attorney-General for India (Shri B. Sen, Advocate, with him), instructed by Shri G. H. Rajadhyaksha, Agent, for Intervener.

Advocates:
ACHHRU RAM, B.SEN, G.H.RAJADHYAKSHA, Gopal Singh, H.RAJADHYAKSHA, H.S.Gujral, M.C.SETALVAD, NAUNIT LAL, S.M.Sikri

Headnote:Article 132 (I), (3)-Grounds of appeal.

       Held: "As the appeals have come up before us on the strength of a certificate granted under Art. 132 (l) of the Constitution, the appellants are not entitled to challenge the propriety of the decision appealed against on a ground other than that on which the certificate was given except with the leave of this court as provided for by clause (3) of Article 132 of the Constitution. - Articles 134, 142-Powers of Supreme Court.

       Held: Where both the courts below in coming to their decision regarding the guilt of the accused did rely to a considerable extent on the so-called admission of the accused which in fact had no existence, the proper order to make will be to direct a rehearing of the appeal by the Sessions Court on the evidence as it actually stands after excluding from consideration the alleged admission of the accused. - Section 423-Connected appeals.

       Held; " It has been argued by Mr. Achhru Ram and in our opinion quite rightly that if the case of Attar Singh is to be heard afresh, the same order should be made in the case of Darshan Singh as well. Not only are the two cases closely interconnected, but so far as Darshan Singh is concerned the prosecution sought to establish his complicity in the affair primarily by adducing evidence to show that he was in the company of Attar Singh when both of them approached Kulraj, the officer-in-charge of the police station, and requested him to allow the truck to pass through." - Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, (1946), Ss. 3, 4-Scope-East Punjab Cotton Cloth and Yarn (Regulation of Movement) Order (1947) Ss. 2, 3, 10.

       Held: "The object of the Essential Supplies Act, as set out in the preamble, was to provide for the continuance, during a limited period of time, of the power to control the production, supply and distribution of, and trade and commerce in, food-stuffs, cotton and woolen textiles, petroleum, iron and other essential commodities, a list of which appeared in the Act itself. S. 3., which is the most material part of the Act, authorised the Central Government, whenever it considered expedient or necessary, for maintaining or increasing supplies of any essential commodity or for securing their suitable distribution .and availability at fair prices, to provide by notified order, for regulating or prohibiting, the production, supply, and distribution thereof or trade and commerce therein. Keeping this object in view and reading the words "trade and commerce" in the light of the context there appears to be no reason why these words should not be taken in their ordinary or natural sense and why restriction on the export of goods to any place outside a province, including a neighboring foreign state should be deemed to be outside their scope and ambit. Even taking the legislation to be purely on the provincial subject of production distribution and supply of goods, restriction of export as ancillary to production and supply of essential commodities would, in our opinion, be quite within the scope and ambit of such legislation and in pith and substance it would be an enactment dealing exclusively with these provincial matters.,

Judgment

MUKHERJEA J.: The facts giving rise to these two connected appeals may be briefly narrated as follows: Darshan Singh, the appellant in Case No. 11, and Attar Singh, who is the appellant in Case No. 12, along with three other persons were tried by the Special Magistrate, Ambala, East Punjab, on charges under S. 120-B, Penal Code, read with S. 3/10, East Punjab Cotton Cloth and Yarn (Regulation of Movement) Order, 1947 and S. 7, Essential Supplies Act, 1946. There was a further charge under S. 8, Essential Supplies Act against three of these accused, Darshan Singh being one of them.

2. The allegation against all the accused, in substance, was that they conspired to export 76 bags of mill-made cloth to Pakistan without a permit, by smuggling them through the customs barrier near Wagha, on the morning of 26th May 1948. Wagha is about 18 miles from Amritsar; and at a distance of nearly half a mile from this place lies the actual Indo-Pakistan border. Between the customs barrier and the border there is a small Police Post and almost opposite the Police Post is the Customs Office which is located in a tent. The prosecution case is that at about 7 A.M. on 26th May 1948, a truck, loaded with a large quantity of mill made cloth owned by the accused Ram Singh, arrived at the customs barrier near Wagha, Rajendra Singh, another accused, who was on duty at that time as the Customs Supervisor, allowed the truck to pass through and the truck stopped near the Customs Office on the side of the Police Post. As soon as the truck stopped, Darshan Singh, who was the Deputy Superintendent in charge of the customs barrier, and Attar Singh, who was a Customs Preventive Officer at Amritsar and was then under order of transfer to some other place, went to the Police Station and asked Kulraj, the Sub-Inspector in charge of the same, to allow the lorry to pass through upto the border.

Kulraj did not accede to this request and thereupon both Darshan Singh and Attar Singh went back to the Customs tent. The truck was then unloaded and the goods were handed over to a large number of coolies who began carrying them towards the border, being followed by both Attar Singh and Ram Singh. A little later, Kailash Chandra, a Police Sub-Inspector of Amritsar who was at that time on special duty in connection with checking and detection of smuggling cases, arrived at the place on a motor bicycle and being informed by Kulraj of what had happened before, both he and Kulraj proceeded in his motor cycle towards the border and overtook the coolies who were carrying the goods. The coolies were rounded up and brought back to the border along with Attar Singh, though Ram Singh managed to slip away, Kailash Chandra made a report of the occurrence to Inder Singh, who was the head of the Special Police Establishment at Delhi dealing with smuggling cases, and after a detailed investigation, the five accused were sent up to take their trial.

The trying Magistrate convicted all of them under S. 120-B, Penal Code, read with S. 3/10, East Punjab Cotton Cloth and Yarn Order, 1947 and sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each. Attar Singh was further convicted under S. 7, Essential Supplies Act and Darshan Singh under S. 8 of the said Act, and there was a sentence of one year s rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000 upon each one of them under these Sections, the sentence of rigorous imprisonment to run concurrently with that on the previous charges.

3. Against this judgment there was an appeal taken by all the accused to the Court of the Sessions Judge at Amritsar. The Additional Sessions Judge, who heard the appeal, acquitted two of the accused but maintained the conviction of the other three, namely, Attar Singh, Ram Singh and Darshan Singh, though their sentences were reduced. Thereupon these three persons presented three separate revision petitions to the High Court of East Punjab at Simla which were heard and disposed of by Khosla J. sitting






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top