M. C. MAHAJAN, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, N. CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, S. R. DASS
Hemraj – Appellant
Versus
Rustomji – Respondent
Judgement
CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR J.: This is an appeal by the defendant against the decree of the High Court of Nagpur,which reversed the decree of the Additional District Judge. Khamgaon, dismissing the plaintiff s suit. Leave to appeal was granted as the value of the subject matter of the suit in the trial Court was Rs. 35,006 and as there were substantial questions of law.
2. The property involved is a Ginning and a pressing factory situated at Khamgaon and the case for the plaintiff is that they belonged originally to Sir Hukumchand and his son RajkumarSing from whom he purchased the factories for a sum of Rs. 35.000 under a registered sale deed dated 26-11-1939. Prior to the sale, there was a letter or note on 3-11-1939, setting out the agreement between the parties relating to the sale. On the next day. possession of the factories was handed over to one Seth Chaosi Dhanji at Khamgaon on behalf of the plaintiff. Two days afterwards, i.e. on the 6th of November, Sir Hukumchand entered into a fresh agreement to sell with the defendant, but this was behind the back of the plaintiff. on the 7th of November, the defendant s men attempted to take forcible possession of the factories fro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.