SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 69

J. C. SHAH, K. N. WANCHOO, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, S. M. SIKRI
Penu Balakrishna Iyer – Appellant
Versus
Ariya M. Ramaswami Iyer – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.B.Naidu, K.N.RAJAGOPAL SASTRI, M.S.K.Shastri, M.S.NARASIMHAN

Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J.I. :

This appeal by special leave raises a short question about the correctness, propriety and legality of the decree passed by the Madras High Court in second appeal No. 91 of 1955. The respondents had sued the appellants in the Court of the District Munsif of Thiruvaiyaru for a mandatory injunction directing the removal of certain masonry structure standing on the suit site which was marked as ABCD in the plan attached to the plaint and for a permanent injunction restraining the appellants from building upon or otherwise encroaching upon suit property and from causing obstruction to the right of way of the residents of the village in which the suit property was situated. According to the respondents, the plot on which encroachment had been caused by the construction of the masonry structure by the appellants was a street and the reliefs they claimed were on the basis that the said property formed of a public street and the appellants had no right to encroach upon it. This suit had been instituted by the respondents in a representative capacity on behalf of themselves and residents in the locality.

2. The appellants disputed the main allegation of the res










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top