SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 269

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, S. M. SIKRI, J. C. SHAH, R. S. BACHAWAT
Bashiruddin Ashraf – Appellant
Versus
Bihar Subai Sunni Majlis-Awaqf – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K.SINHA, SARJU PRASAD, TARKESHVAR DAYAL, Udaipratap Singh

Judgement Key Points

The provided legal document does not contain any explicit reference or statement indicating that "statements made in the impugned order of the high court cannot be challenged in a special leave petition" or that "the correctness of the statements cannot be challenged by the high court." The judgment primarily discusses the jurisdiction, procedural aspects, and merits of the case, as well as the validity of the statutory provisions and amendments. There is no specific mention of the principle that statements in the high court's order are unchallengeable in a special leave petition.


Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J.: The appellant Bashiruddin Ashraf was Mutwalli of certain Waqf properties in Monghyr District, dedicated by one Sheikh Golam Yahya by a registered Waqfnama dated April 11, 1870. Under this deed Mutwallis were chosen from the descendants in the male line of the Waqif from generation to generation. The first Mutwalli was the Waqif. After his death, his wife held charge of the Toliat. After her death the appellant s father and from 1930 the appellant were Mutwallis. The Mutwalli in-charge was entitled to 9/48th share of the income as his remuneration. On April 1, 1948, the Bihar Waqfs Act, 1947 (Act 8 of 1948) came into force and this Waqf came under the purview of that Act and was registered as Waqf No. 67. Under the scheme of the Act the Bihar Subai Sunni Majlise-Awaqf (shortly Majlis) began supervising this Waqf. At all material times one Syed Bashiruddin was the Sadr (Chairman) of the Majlis and Syed Mehdi Hassan was the Nezir-e-Awaqf under S. 22.

2. On March 2, 1949 Syed Naziruddin Ashraf (step-brother of the appellant) and some others presented an application for removal of the appellant from Mutwalliship on numerous charges, including mismanagement, misa























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top