SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 255

P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, S. M. SIKRI, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J. C. SHAH, K. N. WANCHOO
Gulab Bai – Appellant
Versus
Puniya – Respondent


Advocates:
MOHAN BEHARI LAL, O.P.Varma

Judgement

GAJENDRAGADAKAR, C.J.I.: This appeal by special leave arises from an application made by the respondent Puniya in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Jhalawar under S. 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (No. 8 of 1890) (hereinafter called the Act ), for the custody of his daughter Mt. Chitra. To this application, the respondent had impleaded the two appellants, Gulab Bai and her husband Onkar Lal. The respondent is a Kumhar by caste, whereas the appellants are Jat. The respondent s case was that the minor Chitra who was about 11 years of age at the date of the application, had been living with the appellants for the last 4 or 5 years with his consent. Whilst the minor girl was living with the appellants, she used to come to spend some time with the respondent and his wife; but for some time past, the appellants did not allow Chitra to visit her parents. That is why the respondent thought it necessary to move the Court for an order under S. 25 of the Act.

2. The claim thus made by the respondent was disputed by the appellants. They alleged that the respondent and his wife had lost some children in their infancy, and so, they decided to leave the minor in the custody



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top